From: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>
To: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Matthieu Castet <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: nand: Add driver for M-sys / Sandisk diskonchip G4
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 16:23:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111104152352.GA17776@parrot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB3F4AA.8090703@newsguy.com>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 02:20:26PM +0000, Mike Dunn wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 02:14 AM, Matthieu CASTET wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ivan Djelic a écrit :
> >>
> >> 1. When you program a page, before writing hwecc to oob, adjust it like this:
> >>
> >> hwecc[i] ^= blank_read_hwecc[i]^0xff;
> >>
> >> The effect of this is that you now get 0xffs as ecc for blank pages, and bitflip
> >> correction on erased pages for free. This is transparent to your controller,
> >> because this "adjustment" cancels itself upon reading when calc_ecc^recv_ecc is
> >> computed.
>
>
> Not entirely transparent. I didn't think this through. Modifying the
> hw-generated ecc bytes causes the hw to think that there were error(s) on every
> page. True, the driver will know better, but it will slow things down because
> ordinarily the ecc unit only has to be read when the hardware reports errors.
> With this scheme, an error is reported and the ecc bytes read and processed on
> every page.
So you did check this with a real-life test ?
My assumption was that the HW relied entirely on recv_ecc^calc_ecc to decide that
an error had occured. This recv_ecc^calc_ecc polynomial is the _same_ whether you
apply the suggested XOR masking or not (that's the trick).
If your HW reports an error on every page when you apply the XOR masking, it
means it does itself some sort of check (which has probably nothing to do with BCH
decoding) on oob ecc bytes; this would be consistent with the HW flag Robert
mentioned (the one that seems to indicate that a page has been programmed).
BR,
--
Ivan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-04 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-02 23:00 [PATCH v2] mtd: nand: Add driver for M-sys / Sandisk diskonchip G4 Mike Dunn
2011-11-03 8:58 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-11-03 9:14 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-11-03 16:55 ` Mike Dunn
2011-11-04 14:20 ` Mike Dunn
2011-11-04 15:23 ` Ivan Djelic [this message]
2011-11-04 16:58 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-11-04 20:34 ` Mike Dunn
2011-11-03 16:54 ` Mike Dunn
2011-11-03 17:52 ` Mike Dunn
[not found] <1388924089.4520961320317174391.JavaMail.root@zimbra20-e3.priv.proxad.net>
2011-11-03 11:02 ` Robert Jarzmik
2011-11-03 11:59 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-11-08 21:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111104152352.GA17776@parrot.com \
--to=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
--cc=mikedunn@newsguy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.