* [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices
@ 2011-11-07 8:34 Li Dongyang
2011-11-07 9:00 ` Lukas Czerner
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Li Dongyang @ 2011-11-07 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: lczerner, konrad.wilk
As of dfaa2ef68e80c378e610e3c8c536f1c239e8d3ef, loop devices support
discard request now. We could just issue a discard request, and
the loop driver will punch the hole for us, so we don't need to touch
the internals of loop device and punch the hole ourselves, Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com>
---
drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 21 +++------------------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
index 15ec4db..ad365a7 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
@@ -39,9 +39,6 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/freezer.h>
-#include <linux/loop.h>
-#include <linux/falloc.h>
-#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <xen/events.h>
#include <xen/page.h>
@@ -422,25 +419,13 @@ static void xen_blk_discard(struct xen_blkif *blkif, struct blkif_request *req)
int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY;
struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev;
- if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY)
- /* just forward the discard request */
+ if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY ||
+ blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE)
err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev,
req->u.discard.sector_number,
req->u.discard.nr_sectors,
GFP_KERNEL, 0);
- else if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) {
- /* punch a hole in the backing file */
- struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
- struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
-
- if (file->f_op->fallocate)
- err = file->f_op->fallocate(file,
- FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE,
- req->u.discard.sector_number << 9,
- req->u.discard.nr_sectors << 9);
- else
- err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
- } else
+ else
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
--
1.7.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices 2011-11-07 8:34 [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices Li Dongyang @ 2011-11-07 9:00 ` Lukas Czerner 2011-11-08 16:01 ` Jan Beulich ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Lukas Czerner @ 2011-11-07 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Li Dongyang; +Cc: lczerner, xen-devel, konrad.wilk On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Li Dongyang wrote: > As of dfaa2ef68e80c378e610e3c8c536f1c239e8d3ef, loop devices support > discard request now. We could just issue a discard request, and > the loop driver will punch the hole for us, so we don't need to touch > the internals of loop device and punch the hole ourselves, Thanks. Nice, the patch looks good to me. Thanks! -Lukas > > Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> > --- > drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 21 +++------------------ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > index 15ec4db..ad365a7 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > @@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ > #include <linux/list.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/freezer.h> > -#include <linux/loop.h> > -#include <linux/falloc.h> > -#include <linux/fs.h> > > #include <xen/events.h> > #include <xen/page.h> > @@ -422,25 +419,13 @@ static void xen_blk_discard(struct xen_blkif *blkif, struct blkif_request *req) > int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY; > struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev; > > - if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY) > - /* just forward the discard request */ > + if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY || > + blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) > err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, > req->u.discard.sector_number, > req->u.discard.nr_sectors, > GFP_KERNEL, 0); > - else if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) { > - /* punch a hole in the backing file */ > - struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; > - struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; > - > - if (file->f_op->fallocate) > - err = file->f_op->fallocate(file, > - FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, > - req->u.discard.sector_number << 9, > - req->u.discard.nr_sectors << 9); > - else > - err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > - } else > + else > err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) { > -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices 2011-11-07 8:34 [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices Li Dongyang 2011-11-07 9:00 ` Lukas Czerner @ 2011-11-08 16:01 ` Jan Beulich 2011-11-08 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [not found] ` <4EB9606B020000780005FA5B@victor.provo.novell.com> 3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jan Beulich @ 2011-11-08 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dong Yang Li; +Cc: lczerner, xen-devel, konrad.wilk >>> On 07.11.11 at 09:34, Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> wrote: > As of dfaa2ef68e80c378e610e3c8c536f1c239e8d3ef, loop devices support > discard request now. We could just issue a discard request, and > the loop driver will punch the hole for us, so we don't need to touch > the internals of loop device and punch the hole ourselves, Thanks. Looking at what the loop driver now does - doesn't the original code here lack support for lo_offset being non-zero then? If so, should we fix this in pre-3.2 kernels? Jan > Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> > --- > drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 21 +++------------------ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > index 15ec4db..ad365a7 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > @@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ > #include <linux/list.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/freezer.h> > -#include <linux/loop.h> > -#include <linux/falloc.h> > -#include <linux/fs.h> > > #include <xen/events.h> > #include <xen/page.h> > @@ -422,25 +419,13 @@ static void xen_blk_discard(struct xen_blkif *blkif, > struct blkif_request *req) > int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY; > struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev; > > - if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY) > - /* just forward the discard request */ > + if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY || > + blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) > err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, > req->u.discard.sector_number, > req->u.discard.nr_sectors, > GFP_KERNEL, 0); > - else if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) { > - /* punch a hole in the backing file */ > - struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; > - struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; > - > - if (file->f_op->fallocate) > - err = file->f_op->fallocate(file, > - FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, > - req->u.discard.sector_number << 9, > - req->u.discard.nr_sectors << 9); > - else > - err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > - } else > + else > err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices 2011-11-07 8:34 [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices Li Dongyang 2011-11-07 9:00 ` Lukas Czerner 2011-11-08 16:01 ` Jan Beulich @ 2011-11-08 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2011-11-09 9:17 ` Li Dongyang [not found] ` <4EB9606B020000780005FA5B@victor.provo.novell.com> 3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2011-11-08 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Li Dongyang; +Cc: lczerner, xen-devel On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:34:26PM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote: > As of dfaa2ef68e80c378e610e3c8c536f1c239e8d3ef, loop devices support > discard request now. We could just issue a discard request, and > the loop driver will punch the hole for us, so we don't need to touch > the internals of loop device and punch the hole ourselves, Thanks. Can I ask you to do two things: 1). Look in whether we can just eliminate the BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE altogether? 2). Rebase this on top #devel/for-jens-3.3 (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git) Thanks! > > Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> > --- > drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 21 +++------------------ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > index 15ec4db..ad365a7 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > @@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ > #include <linux/list.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/freezer.h> > -#include <linux/loop.h> > -#include <linux/falloc.h> > -#include <linux/fs.h> > > #include <xen/events.h> > #include <xen/page.h> > @@ -422,25 +419,13 @@ static void xen_blk_discard(struct xen_blkif *blkif, struct blkif_request *req) > int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY; > struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev; > > - if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY) > - /* just forward the discard request */ > + if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY || > + blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) > err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, > req->u.discard.sector_number, > req->u.discard.nr_sectors, > GFP_KERNEL, 0); > - else if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) { > - /* punch a hole in the backing file */ > - struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; > - struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; > - > - if (file->f_op->fallocate) > - err = file->f_op->fallocate(file, > - FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, > - req->u.discard.sector_number << 9, > - req->u.discard.nr_sectors << 9); > - else > - err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > - } else > + else > err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) { > -- > 1.7.7 > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices 2011-11-08 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2011-11-09 9:17 ` Li Dongyang 2011-11-10 6:36 ` Li Dongyang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Li Dongyang @ 2011-11-09 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; +Cc: lczerner, xen-devel On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:34:26PM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote: >> As of dfaa2ef68e80c378e610e3c8c536f1c239e8d3ef, loop devices support >> discard request now. We could just issue a discard request, and >> the loop driver will punch the hole for us, so we don't need to touch >> the internals of loop device and punch the hole ourselves, Thanks. > > Can I ask you to do two things: > 1). Look in whether we can just eliminate the BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE altogether? I think we still need that flag, as for other type of backing dev, we will figure it out and send back a EOPNOTSUPP. > 2). Rebase this on top #devel/for-jens-3.3 (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git) no problem > > Thanks! >> >> Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> >> --- >> drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 21 +++------------------ >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> index 15ec4db..ad365a7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> @@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ >> #include <linux/list.h> >> #include <linux/delay.h> >> #include <linux/freezer.h> >> -#include <linux/loop.h> >> -#include <linux/falloc.h> >> -#include <linux/fs.h> >> >> #include <xen/events.h> >> #include <xen/page.h> >> @@ -422,25 +419,13 @@ static void xen_blk_discard(struct xen_blkif *blkif, struct blkif_request *req) >> int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY; >> struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev; >> >> - if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY) >> - /* just forward the discard request */ >> + if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY || >> + blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) >> err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, >> req->u.discard.sector_number, >> req->u.discard.nr_sectors, >> GFP_KERNEL, 0); >> - else if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) { >> - /* punch a hole in the backing file */ >> - struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; >> - struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; >> - >> - if (file->f_op->fallocate) >> - err = file->f_op->fallocate(file, >> - FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, >> - req->u.discard.sector_number << 9, >> - req->u.discard.nr_sectors << 9); >> - else >> - err = -EOPNOTSUPP; >> - } else >> + else >> err = -EOPNOTSUPP; >> >> if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) { >> -- >> 1.7.7 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices 2011-11-09 9:17 ` Li Dongyang @ 2011-11-10 6:36 ` Li Dongyang 2011-11-10 7:31 ` Lukas Czerner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Li Dongyang @ 2011-11-10 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, lczerner; +Cc: xen-devel What am bit not sure is the secure_discard, since you've added the sec_discard to your tree, I'm wondering if we should treat hole punching as a secure discard to guest. Lukas, why u didn't add QUEUE_FLAG_SECDISCARD in your commit? is there something need to do with loop driver to have that flag? Thanks On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:34:26PM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote: >>> As of dfaa2ef68e80c378e610e3c8c536f1c239e8d3ef, loop devices support >>> discard request now. We could just issue a discard request, and >>> the loop driver will punch the hole for us, so we don't need to touch >>> the internals of loop device and punch the hole ourselves, Thanks. >> >> Can I ask you to do two things: >> 1). Look in whether we can just eliminate the BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE altogether? > I think we still need that flag, as for other type of backing dev, we > will figure it out and send back a EOPNOTSUPP. >> 2). Rebase this on top #devel/for-jens-3.3 (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git) > no problem >> >> Thanks! >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 21 +++------------------ >>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >>> index 15ec4db..ad365a7 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >>> @@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ >>> #include <linux/list.h> >>> #include <linux/delay.h> >>> #include <linux/freezer.h> >>> -#include <linux/loop.h> >>> -#include <linux/falloc.h> >>> -#include <linux/fs.h> >>> >>> #include <xen/events.h> >>> #include <xen/page.h> >>> @@ -422,25 +419,13 @@ static void xen_blk_discard(struct xen_blkif *blkif, struct blkif_request *req) >>> int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY; >>> struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev; >>> >>> - if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY) >>> - /* just forward the discard request */ >>> + if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY || >>> + blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) >>> err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, >>> req->u.discard.sector_number, >>> req->u.discard.nr_sectors, >>> GFP_KERNEL, 0); >>> - else if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) { >>> - /* punch a hole in the backing file */ >>> - struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; >>> - struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; >>> - >>> - if (file->f_op->fallocate) >>> - err = file->f_op->fallocate(file, >>> - FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, >>> - req->u.discard.sector_number << 9, >>> - req->u.discard.nr_sectors << 9); >>> - else >>> - err = -EOPNOTSUPP; >>> - } else >>> + else >>> err = -EOPNOTSUPP; >>> >>> if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) { >>> -- >>> 1.7.7 >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-devel mailing list >>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices 2011-11-10 6:36 ` Li Dongyang @ 2011-11-10 7:31 ` Lukas Czerner 2011-11-10 7:51 ` Li Dongyang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Lukas Czerner @ 2011-11-10 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Li Dongyang; +Cc: lczerner, xen-devel, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 4243 bytes --] On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Li Dongyang wrote: > What am bit not sure is the secure_discard, since you've added the > sec_discard to your tree, > I'm wondering if we should treat hole punching as a secure discard to guest. > Lukas, why u didn't add QUEUE_FLAG_SECDISCARD in your commit? is there > something need to > do with loop driver to have that flag? Thanks Hi, IIRC secure discard is almost the same as the "regular" discard, except all sectors previously used for this data (moved by garbage collector) are discarded as well. That is something only hardware can do, so I do not think we should support this in loop driver. We would not be doing anything different from "regular" discard anyway - that means just send punch hole to the file system. So I think that there is no reason secure discard should be supported by loop driver, since there is nothing more "secure" about it. Thanks! -Lukas > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:34:26PM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote: > >>> As of dfaa2ef68e80c378e610e3c8c536f1c239e8d3ef, loop devices support > >>> discard request now. We could just issue a discard request, and > >>> the loop driver will punch the hole for us, so we don't need to touch > >>> the internals of loop device and punch the hole ourselves, Thanks. > >> > >> Can I ask you to do two things: > >> 1). Look in whether we can just eliminate the BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE altogether? > > I think we still need that flag, as for other type of backing dev, we > > will figure it out and send back a EOPNOTSUPP. > >> 2). Rebase this on top #devel/for-jens-3.3 (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git) > > no problem > >> > >> Thanks! > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 21 +++------------------ > >>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > >>> index 15ec4db..ad365a7 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c > >>> @@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ > >>> #include <linux/list.h> > >>> #include <linux/delay.h> > >>> #include <linux/freezer.h> > >>> -#include <linux/loop.h> > >>> -#include <linux/falloc.h> > >>> -#include <linux/fs.h> > >>> > >>> #include <xen/events.h> > >>> #include <xen/page.h> > >>> @@ -422,25 +419,13 @@ static void xen_blk_discard(struct xen_blkif *blkif, struct blkif_request *req) > >>> int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY; > >>> struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev; > >>> > >>> - if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY) > >>> - /* just forward the discard request */ > >>> + if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY || > >>> + blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) > >>> err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, > >>> req->u.discard.sector_number, > >>> req->u.discard.nr_sectors, > >>> GFP_KERNEL, 0); > >>> - else if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) { > >>> - /* punch a hole in the backing file */ > >>> - struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; > >>> - struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; > >>> - > >>> - if (file->f_op->fallocate) > >>> - err = file->f_op->fallocate(file, > >>> - FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, > >>> - req->u.discard.sector_number << 9, > >>> - req->u.discard.nr_sectors << 9); > >>> - else > >>> - err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>> - } else > >>> + else > >>> err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > >>> > >>> if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) { > >>> -- > >>> 1.7.7 > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Xen-devel mailing list > >>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > >> > > > -- [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices 2011-11-10 7:31 ` Lukas Czerner @ 2011-11-10 7:51 ` Li Dongyang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Li Dongyang @ 2011-11-10 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lukas Czerner; +Cc: xen-devel, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Thanks for this, so we are good then, we just set the SEC_DISCARD flag only if the backing dev really have that flag on the queue and, if it's a file backend, the flag is always cleared, I'll send out the rebased patch soon, Thanks. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Li Dongyang wrote: > >> What am bit not sure is the secure_discard, since you've added the >> sec_discard to your tree, >> I'm wondering if we should treat hole punching as a secure discard to guest. >> Lukas, why u didn't add QUEUE_FLAG_SECDISCARD in your commit? is there >> something need to >> do with loop driver to have that flag? Thanks > > Hi, > > IIRC secure discard is almost the same as the "regular" discard, except > all sectors previously used for this data (moved by garbage collector) > are discarded as well. That is something only hardware can do, so I do > not think we should support this in loop driver. We would not be doing > anything different from "regular" discard anyway - that means just send > punch hole to the file system. > > So I think that there is no reason secure discard should be supported by > loop driver, since there is nothing more "secure" about it. > > Thanks! > -Lukas > >> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> > <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:34:26PM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote: >> >>> As of dfaa2ef68e80c378e610e3c8c536f1c239e8d3ef, loop devices support >> >>> discard request now. We could just issue a discard request, and >> >>> the loop driver will punch the hole for us, so we don't need to touch >> >>> the internals of loop device and punch the hole ourselves, Thanks. >> >> >> >> Can I ask you to do two things: >> >> 1). Look in whether we can just eliminate the BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE altogether? >> > I think we still need that flag, as for other type of backing dev, we >> > will figure it out and send back a EOPNOTSUPP. >> >> 2). Rebase this on top #devel/for-jens-3.3 (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git) >> > no problem >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> >> >>> --- >> >>> drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 21 +++------------------ >> >>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >>> >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> >>> index 15ec4db..ad365a7 100644 >> >>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> >>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> >>> @@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ >> >>> #include <linux/list.h> >> >>> #include <linux/delay.h> >> >>> #include <linux/freezer.h> >> >>> -#include <linux/loop.h> >> >>> -#include <linux/falloc.h> >> >>> -#include <linux/fs.h> >> >>> >> >>> #include <xen/events.h> >> >>> #include <xen/page.h> >> >>> @@ -422,25 +419,13 @@ static void xen_blk_discard(struct xen_blkif *blkif, struct blkif_request *req) >> >>> int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY; >> >>> struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev; >> >>> >> >>> - if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY) >> >>> - /* just forward the discard request */ >> >>> + if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY || >> >>> + blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) >> >>> err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, >> >>> req->u.discard.sector_number, >> >>> req->u.discard.nr_sectors, >> >>> GFP_KERNEL, 0); >> >>> - else if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) { >> >>> - /* punch a hole in the backing file */ >> >>> - struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; >> >>> - struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; >> >>> - >> >>> - if (file->f_op->fallocate) >> >>> - err = file->f_op->fallocate(file, >> >>> - FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, >> >>> - req->u.discard.sector_number << 9, >> >>> - req->u.discard.nr_sectors << 9); >> >>> - else >> >>> - err = -EOPNOTSUPP; >> >>> - } else >> >>> + else >> >>> err = -EOPNOTSUPP; >> >>> >> >>> if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) { >> >>> -- >> >>> 1.7.7 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Xen-devel mailing list >> >>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >> >> >> > >> > > -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4EB9606B020000780005FA5B@victor.provo.novell.com>]
* Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices [not found] ` <4EB9606B020000780005FA5B@victor.provo.novell.com> @ 2011-11-09 9:16 ` Li Dongyang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Li Dongyang @ 2011-11-09 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: lczerner, Dong Yang Li, xen-devel, konrad.wilk On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: >>>> On 07.11.11 at 09:34, Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> wrote: >> As of dfaa2ef68e80c378e610e3c8c536f1c239e8d3ef, loop devices support >> discard request now. We could just issue a discard request, and >> the loop driver will punch the hole for us, so we don't need to touch >> the internals of loop device and punch the hole ourselves, Thanks. > > Looking at what the loop driver now does - doesn't the original code > here lack support for lo_offset being non-zero then? If so, should we > fix this in pre-3.2 kernels? yes, you are right, but will we ever setup the loop device with lo_offset non-zero? I don't think so but I'm not sure. > > Jan > >> Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> >> --- >> drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 21 +++------------------ >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> index 15ec4db..ad365a7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c >> @@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ >> #include <linux/list.h> >> #include <linux/delay.h> >> #include <linux/freezer.h> >> -#include <linux/loop.h> >> -#include <linux/falloc.h> >> -#include <linux/fs.h> >> >> #include <xen/events.h> >> #include <xen/page.h> >> @@ -422,25 +419,13 @@ static void xen_blk_discard(struct xen_blkif *blkif, >> struct blkif_request *req) >> int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY; >> struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev; >> >> - if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY) >> - /* just forward the discard request */ >> + if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY || >> + blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) >> err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, >> req->u.discard.sector_number, >> req->u.discard.nr_sectors, >> GFP_KERNEL, 0); >> - else if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) { >> - /* punch a hole in the backing file */ >> - struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; >> - struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; >> - >> - if (file->f_op->fallocate) >> - err = file->f_op->fallocate(file, >> - FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, >> - req->u.discard.sector_number << 9, >> - req->u.discard.nr_sectors << 9); >> - else >> - err = -EOPNOTSUPP; >> - } else >> + else >> err = -EOPNOTSUPP; >> >> if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) { > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-10 7:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-07 8:34 [PATCH] xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on loop devices Li Dongyang
2011-11-07 9:00 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-11-08 16:01 ` Jan Beulich
2011-11-08 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-09 9:17 ` Li Dongyang
2011-11-10 6:36 ` Li Dongyang
2011-11-10 7:31 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-11-10 7:51 ` Li Dongyang
[not found] ` <4EB9606B020000780005FA5B@victor.provo.novell.com>
2011-11-09 9:16 ` Li Dongyang
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.