All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5]thp: improve the error code path
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:06:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111110030646.GT5075@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1111091828500.32414@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 06:43:58PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> You're right, but I agree that the #ifdef's just make the function error 
> handling much too complex.  Would you mind adding sysfs_*_out labels at 
> the end of the function to handle these errors instead?  And I think we 
> should be doing khugepaged_slab_init() and mm_slots_hash_init() before 
> initializing sysfs.
> 
> Something like
> 
> 	out:
> 		khugepaged_slab_free();
> 		mm_slots_hash_free();	<-- after you remove it from #if 0
> 		return err;
> 
> 	#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> 	sysfs_khugepaged_out:
> 		sysfs_remove_group(hugepage_kobj, &khugepaged_attr_group);
> 	sysfs_hugepage_out:
> 		sysfs_remove_group(hugepage_kobj, &hugepage_attr_group);
> 		...
> 		goto out;
> 	#endif

Before after won't matter much I guess... If you really want to clean
the code, I wonder what is exactly the point of those dummy functions
if we can't call those outside of #ifdefs. I mean a cleanup that adds
more #ifdefs when there are explicit dummy functions which I assume
are meant to be used outside of #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS doesn't sound so
clean in the first place. I understand you need to refactor the code
above to call those outside of #ifdefs but hey if you're happy with
#ifdef I'm happy too :). It just looks fishy to read sysfs.h dummy
functions and #ifdefs. When I wrote the code I hardly could have
wondered about the sysfs #ifdefs but at this point it's only cleanups
I'm seeing so I actually noticed that.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5]thp: improve the error code path
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:06:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111110030646.GT5075@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1111091828500.32414@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 06:43:58PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> You're right, but I agree that the #ifdef's just make the function error 
> handling much too complex.  Would you mind adding sysfs_*_out labels at 
> the end of the function to handle these errors instead?  And I think we 
> should be doing khugepaged_slab_init() and mm_slots_hash_init() before 
> initializing sysfs.
> 
> Something like
> 
> 	out:
> 		khugepaged_slab_free();
> 		mm_slots_hash_free();	<-- after you remove it from #if 0
> 		return err;
> 
> 	#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> 	sysfs_khugepaged_out:
> 		sysfs_remove_group(hugepage_kobj, &khugepaged_attr_group);
> 	sysfs_hugepage_out:
> 		sysfs_remove_group(hugepage_kobj, &hugepage_attr_group);
> 		...
> 		goto out;
> 	#endif

Before after won't matter much I guess... If you really want to clean
the code, I wonder what is exactly the point of those dummy functions
if we can't call those outside of #ifdefs. I mean a cleanup that adds
more #ifdefs when there are explicit dummy functions which I assume
are meant to be used outside of #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS doesn't sound so
clean in the first place. I understand you need to refactor the code
above to call those outside of #ifdefs but hey if you're happy with
#ifdef I'm happy too :). It just looks fishy to read sysfs.h dummy
functions and #ifdefs. When I wrote the code I hardly could have
wondered about the sysfs #ifdefs but at this point it's only cleanups
I'm seeing so I actually noticed that.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-10  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-25  2:58 [patch 1/5]thp: improve the error code path Shaohua Li
2011-10-25  2:58 ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-25 11:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-25 11:44   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-10-26  1:48   ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-26  1:48     ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-07  5:17     ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-07  5:17       ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10  2:18       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10  2:18         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10  2:33         ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10  2:33           ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10  2:43           ` David Rientjes
2011-11-10  2:43             ` David Rientjes
2011-11-10  3:06             ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2011-11-10  3:06               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10  4:43               ` David Rientjes
2011-11-10  4:43                 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-10  5:56                 ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10  5:56                   ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10  6:08                   ` David Rientjes
2011-11-10  6:08                     ` David Rientjes
2011-11-10  6:27                     ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10  6:27                       ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-10 14:14                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10 14:14                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-11  6:33                     ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-11  6:33                       ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-11  6:50                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-11  6:50                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10  2:59           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10  2:59             ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111110030646.GT5075@redhat.com \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.