From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, levinsasha928@gmail.com,
Virtualization List <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] virtio: net: Add freeze, restore handlers to support S4
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:19:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111117121907.GA19682@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85eca44fe83d2deabfdf402bfed72531ebad6026.1321530505.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 05:27:40PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> Remove all the vqs and detach from the netdev on hibernation.
>
> Re-create vqs after restoring from a hibernated image and re-attach the
> netdev. This keeps networking working across hibernation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index fbff37a..167b555 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1127,6 +1127,9 @@ static void remove_vq_common(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> {
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>
> + /* Stop all the virtqueues. */
> + vi->vdev->config->reset(vi->vdev);
> +
> /* Free unused buffers in both send and recv, if any. */
> free_unused_bufs(vi);
>
> @@ -1140,9 +1143,6 @@ static void __devexit virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
>
> - /* Stop all the virtqueues. */
> - vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> -
> unregister_netdev(vi->dev);
>
> remove_vq_common(vi);
> @@ -1151,6 +1151,33 @@ static void __devexit virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> free_netdev(vi->dev);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int virtnet_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> +
> + netif_device_detach(vi->dev);
> + remove_vq_common(vi);
This stops TX in progress, if any, but not RX
which might use the RX VQ. Then remove_vq_common
might delete this VQ while it's still in use.
So I think we need to call something like napi_disable.
However, the subtle twist is that we need to call that
*after interrupts have been disabled*.
Otherwise we might schedule another napi callback.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int virtnet_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = init_vqs(vi);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + netif_device_attach(vi->dev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> { VIRTIO_ID_NET, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> { 0 },
> @@ -1175,6 +1202,10 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_net_driver = {
> .probe = virtnet_probe,
> .remove = __devexit_p(virtnet_remove),
> .config_changed = virtnet_config_changed,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> + .freeze = virtnet_freeze,
> + .restore = virtnet_restore,
> +#endif
> };
>
> static int __init init(void)
> --
> 1.7.7.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Virtualization List <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
levinsasha928@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] virtio: net: Add freeze, restore handlers to support S4
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:19:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111117121907.GA19682@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85eca44fe83d2deabfdf402bfed72531ebad6026.1321530505.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 05:27:40PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> Remove all the vqs and detach from the netdev on hibernation.
>
> Re-create vqs after restoring from a hibernated image and re-attach the
> netdev. This keeps networking working across hibernation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index fbff37a..167b555 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1127,6 +1127,9 @@ static void remove_vq_common(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> {
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>
> + /* Stop all the virtqueues. */
> + vi->vdev->config->reset(vi->vdev);
> +
> /* Free unused buffers in both send and recv, if any. */
> free_unused_bufs(vi);
>
> @@ -1140,9 +1143,6 @@ static void __devexit virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
>
> - /* Stop all the virtqueues. */
> - vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> -
> unregister_netdev(vi->dev);
>
> remove_vq_common(vi);
> @@ -1151,6 +1151,33 @@ static void __devexit virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> free_netdev(vi->dev);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int virtnet_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> +
> + netif_device_detach(vi->dev);
> + remove_vq_common(vi);
This stops TX in progress, if any, but not RX
which might use the RX VQ. Then remove_vq_common
might delete this VQ while it's still in use.
So I think we need to call something like napi_disable.
However, the subtle twist is that we need to call that
*after interrupts have been disabled*.
Otherwise we might schedule another napi callback.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int virtnet_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = init_vqs(vi);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + netif_device_attach(vi->dev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> { VIRTIO_ID_NET, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> { 0 },
> @@ -1175,6 +1202,10 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_net_driver = {
> .probe = virtnet_probe,
> .remove = __devexit_p(virtnet_remove),
> .config_changed = virtnet_config_changed,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> + .freeze = virtnet_freeze,
> + .restore = virtnet_restore,
> +#endif
> };
>
> static int __init init(void)
> --
> 1.7.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-17 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 11:57 [PATCH v3 00/11] virtio: S4 support Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] virtio: pci: switch to new PM API Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] virtio: pci: add PM notification handlers for restore, freeze, thaw, poweroff Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] virtio: console: Move out vq and vq buf removal into separate functions Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] virtio: console: Add freeze and restore handlers to support S4 Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 12:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 12:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] virtio: blk: Move out vq initialization to separate function Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] virtio: blk: Add freeze, restore handlers to support S4 Amit Shah
2011-11-17 12:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 12:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] virtio: net: Move out vq initialization into separate function Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] virtio: net: Move out vq and vq buf removal " Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] virtio: net: Add freeze, restore handlers to support S4 Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 12:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-11-17 12:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 12:27 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 12:27 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] virtio: balloon: Move out vq initialization into separate function Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] virtio: balloon: Add freeze, restore handlers to support S4 Amit Shah
2011-11-17 11:57 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 12:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 12:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 12:29 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 12:29 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 12:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 12:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 13:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-17 13:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111117121907.GA19682@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.