From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
Luis Henriques <henrix@camandro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] mm: memcg: shorten preempt-disabled section around event checks
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:09:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111121110954.GE1771@redhat.com> (raw)
-rt ran into a problem with the soft limit spinlock inside the
non-preemptible section, because that is sleeping inside an atomic
context. But I think it makes sense for vanilla, too, to keep the
non-preemptible section as short as possible. Also, -3 lines.
Yong, Luis, could you add your Tested-bys?
---
Only the ratelimit checks themselves have to run with preemption
disabled, the resulting actions - checking for usage thresholds,
updating the soft limit tree - can and should run with preemption
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Luis Henriques <henrix@camandro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 6aff93c..8e62d3e 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -683,37 +683,32 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
return total;
}
-static bool __memcg_event_check(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int target)
+static bool mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ enum mem_cgroup_events_target target)
{
unsigned long val, next;
val = __this_cpu_read(memcg->stat->events[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_COUNT]);
next = __this_cpu_read(memcg->stat->targets[target]);
/* from time_after() in jiffies.h */
- return ((long)next - (long)val < 0);
-}
-
-static void __mem_cgroup_target_update(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int target)
-{
- unsigned long val, next;
-
- val = __this_cpu_read(memcg->stat->events[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_COUNT]);
-
- switch (target) {
- case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH:
- next = val + THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_TARGET;
- break;
- case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT:
- next = val + SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_TARGET;
- break;
- case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO:
- next = val + NUMAINFO_EVENTS_TARGET;
- break;
- default:
- return;
+ if ((long)next - (long)val < 0) {
+ switch (target) {
+ case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH:
+ next = val + THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_TARGET;
+ break;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT:
+ next = val + SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_TARGET;
+ break;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO:
+ next = val + NUMAINFO_EVENTS_TARGET;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ __this_cpu_write(memcg->stat->targets[target], next);
+ return true;
}
-
- __this_cpu_write(memcg->stat->targets[target], next);
+ return false;
}
/*
@@ -724,25 +719,27 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
{
preempt_disable();
/* threshold event is triggered in finer grain than soft limit */
- if (unlikely(__memcg_event_check(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
+ if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
+ MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
+ bool do_softlimit, do_numainfo;
+
+ do_softlimit = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
+ MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
+#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
+ do_numainfo = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
+ MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO);
+#endif
+ preempt_enable();
+
mem_cgroup_threshold(memcg);
- __mem_cgroup_target_update(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH);
- if (unlikely(__memcg_event_check(memcg,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT))) {
+ if (unlikely(do_softlimit))
mem_cgroup_update_tree(memcg, page);
- __mem_cgroup_target_update(memcg,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
- }
#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
- if (unlikely(__memcg_event_check(memcg,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO))) {
+ if (unlikely(do_numainfo))
atomic_inc(&memcg->numainfo_events);
- __mem_cgroup_target_update(memcg,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO);
- }
#endif
- }
- preempt_enable();
+ } else
+ preempt_enable();
}
static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_cont(struct cgroup *cont)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
Luis Henriques <henrix@camandro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] mm: memcg: shorten preempt-disabled section around event checks
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:09:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111121110954.GE1771@redhat.com> (raw)
-rt ran into a problem with the soft limit spinlock inside the
non-preemptible section, because that is sleeping inside an atomic
context. But I think it makes sense for vanilla, too, to keep the
non-preemptible section as short as possible. Also, -3 lines.
Yong, Luis, could you add your Tested-bys?
---
Only the ratelimit checks themselves have to run with preemption
disabled, the resulting actions - checking for usage thresholds,
updating the soft limit tree - can and should run with preemption
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Luis Henriques <henrix@camandro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 6aff93c..8e62d3e 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -683,37 +683,32 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
return total;
}
-static bool __memcg_event_check(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int target)
+static bool mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ enum mem_cgroup_events_target target)
{
unsigned long val, next;
val = __this_cpu_read(memcg->stat->events[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_COUNT]);
next = __this_cpu_read(memcg->stat->targets[target]);
/* from time_after() in jiffies.h */
- return ((long)next - (long)val < 0);
-}
-
-static void __mem_cgroup_target_update(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int target)
-{
- unsigned long val, next;
-
- val = __this_cpu_read(memcg->stat->events[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_COUNT]);
-
- switch (target) {
- case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH:
- next = val + THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_TARGET;
- break;
- case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT:
- next = val + SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_TARGET;
- break;
- case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO:
- next = val + NUMAINFO_EVENTS_TARGET;
- break;
- default:
- return;
+ if ((long)next - (long)val < 0) {
+ switch (target) {
+ case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH:
+ next = val + THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_TARGET;
+ break;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT:
+ next = val + SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_TARGET;
+ break;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO:
+ next = val + NUMAINFO_EVENTS_TARGET;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ __this_cpu_write(memcg->stat->targets[target], next);
+ return true;
}
-
- __this_cpu_write(memcg->stat->targets[target], next);
+ return false;
}
/*
@@ -724,25 +719,27 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
{
preempt_disable();
/* threshold event is triggered in finer grain than soft limit */
- if (unlikely(__memcg_event_check(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
+ if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
+ MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
+ bool do_softlimit, do_numainfo;
+
+ do_softlimit = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
+ MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
+#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
+ do_numainfo = mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit(memcg,
+ MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO);
+#endif
+ preempt_enable();
+
mem_cgroup_threshold(memcg);
- __mem_cgroup_target_update(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH);
- if (unlikely(__memcg_event_check(memcg,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT))) {
+ if (unlikely(do_softlimit))
mem_cgroup_update_tree(memcg, page);
- __mem_cgroup_target_update(memcg,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
- }
#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
- if (unlikely(__memcg_event_check(memcg,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO))) {
+ if (unlikely(do_numainfo))
atomic_inc(&memcg->numainfo_events);
- __mem_cgroup_target_update(memcg,
- MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_NUMAINFO);
- }
#endif
- }
- preempt_enable();
+ } else
+ preempt_enable();
}
static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_cont(struct cgroup *cont)
next reply other threads:[~2011-11-21 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-21 11:09 Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-11-21 11:09 ` [patch] mm: memcg: shorten preempt-disabled section around event checks Johannes Weiner
2011-11-21 13:36 ` Luis Henriques
2011-11-21 13:36 ` Luis Henriques
[not found] ` <20111121110954.GE1771-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-21 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-21 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-21 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-22 0:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-11-22 0:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-11-22 0:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-11-22 2:09 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-22 2:09 ` Yong Zhang
2011-11-22 2:09 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111121110954.GE1771@redhat.com \
--to=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=henrix@camandro.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.