From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Sven Neumann <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>,
timur@freescale.com, lrg@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: ASoC: cs4720: use snd_soc_cache_sync()
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:53:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111122155340.GB30583@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECBC367.8080801@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:44:39PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> The code is so simple that I'm starting to suspect
> i2c_smbus_write_byte_data() is doing something very wrong, but I can't
> trace it without a hardware I2C analyzer right now. The i2c-regmap
> low-level implementation uses different access functions under the hood,
> so maybe that's a regression.
Could be, though I can't see any changes in the code here. It might be
that a change between SMBus and regmap at runtime is upsetting the
device somehow but given that it's supposed to be coming back from a
power on reset...
> We also think that the effect is actually rather new.
Does reverting to the non-regmap soc-io.c help?
> > In any case, the patch is moving to factor code out in favour of core
> > facilities so it's a good idea anyway.
> Hmm, we should really care for the root cause, but maybe we can still
> commit this thing, with a more appropriate commit log?
I think so.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-22 13:45 [PATCH] ALSA: ASoC: cs4720: use snd_soc_cache_sync() Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 14:02 ` Mark Brown
2011-11-22 15:23 ` Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 15:35 ` Mark Brown
2011-11-22 15:37 ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-22 15:41 ` Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 15:43 ` Mark Brown
2011-11-22 15:44 ` Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 15:47 ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-22 15:57 ` Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 16:12 ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-22 15:53 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-11-22 16:04 ` Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 16:08 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111122155340.GB30583@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=s.neumann@raumfeld.com \
--cc=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=zonque@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.