From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:23:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111129032323.GC19506@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111121152958.e4fd76d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:29:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:18:24 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > The accounting code will be compiled in by default (CONFIG_READAHEAD_STATS=y),
> > and will remain inactive unless enabled explicitly with either boot option
> >
> > readahead_stats=1
> >
> > or through the debugfs interface
> >
> > echo 1 > /debug/readahead/stats_enable
>
> It's unfortunate that these two things have different names.
Yes unfortunately.
> I'd have thought that the debugfs knob was sufficient - no need for the
> boot option.
The boot option intents to catch the boot time readaheads.
However it's not that big deal, I'll drop the boot option.
> > The added overheads are two readahead_stats() calls per readahead.
> > Which is trivial costs unless there are concurrent random reads on
> > super fast SSDs, which may lead to cache bouncing when updating the
> > global ra_stats[][]. Considering that normal users won't need this
> > except when debugging performance problems, it's disabled by default.
> > So it looks reasonable to keep this debug code simple rather than trying
> > to improve its scalability.
>
> I may be wrong, but I don't think the CPU cost of this code matters a
> lot. People will rarely turn it on and disk IO is a lot slower than
> CPU actions and it's waaaaaaay more important to get high-quality info
> about readahead than it is to squeeze out a few CPU cycles.
Agreed in general.
> > @@ -51,6 +62,182 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(file_ra_state_init);
> >
> > #define list_to_page(head) (list_entry((head)->prev, struct page, lru))
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_READAHEAD_STATS
> > +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > +
> > +static u32 readahead_stats_enable __read_mostly;
> > +
> > +static int __init config_readahead_stats(char *str)
> > +{
> > + int enable = 1;
> > + get_option(&str, &enable);
> > + readahead_stats_enable = enable;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +early_param("readahead_stats", config_readahead_stats);
>
> Why use early_param() rather than plain old __setup()?
Heh it's a no-brain copy from other code ;)
Anyway, the readahead_stats boot parameter will be dropped.
> > +enum ra_account {
> > + /* number of readaheads */
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_COUNT, /* readahead request */
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_EOF, /* readahead request covers EOF */
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_CHIT, /* readahead request covers some cached pages */
>
> I don't like chit :) "cache_hit" would be better. Or just "hit".
Yeah it's not good. I renamed it to RA_ACCOUNT_CACHE_HIT.
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_ASIZE, /* readahead async size */
Also renamed that to RA_ACCOUNT_ASYNC_SIZE.
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_ACTUAL, /* readahead actual IO size */
> > + /* end mark */
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_MAX,
> > +};
> > +
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static void readahead_event(struct address_space *mapping,
> > + pgoff_t offset,
> > + unsigned long req_size,
> > + unsigned int ra_flags,
> > + pgoff_t start,
> > + unsigned int size,
> > + unsigned int async_size,
> > + unsigned int actual)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_READAHEAD_STATS
> > + if (readahead_stats_enable) {
> > + readahead_stats(mapping, offset, req_size, ra_flags,
> > + start, size, async_size, actual);
> > + readahead_stats(mapping, offset, req_size,
> > + RA_PATTERN_ALL << READAHEAD_PATTERN_SHIFT,
> > + start, size, async_size, actual);
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > +}
>
> The stub should be inlined, methinks. The overhead of evaluating and
> preparing eight arguments is significant. I don't think the compiler
> is yet smart enough to save us.
The parameter list actually becomes even out of control when doing the
bit fields:
+ readahead_event(mapping, offset, req_size,
+ ra->pattern, ra->for_mmap, ra->for_metadata,
+ ra->start + ra->size >= eof,
+ ra->start, ra->size, ra->async_size, actual);
So I end up passing file_ra_state around. The added cost is, I'll have
to dynamically create a file_ra_state for the fadvise case, which
should be acceptable since it's a cold path.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- linux-next.orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2011-11-21 17:08:38.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-next/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2011-11-21 17:08:51.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -2251,6 +2251,12 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes
> > This default max readahead size may be overrode
> > in some cases, notably NFS, btrfs and software RAID.
> >
> > + readahead_stats[=0|1]
> > + Enable/disable readahead stats accounting.
> > +
> > + It's also possible to enable/disable it after boot:
> > + echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/stats_enable
>
> Can the current setting be read back?
Yes. This is possible:
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/stats_enable
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:23:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111129032323.GC19506@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111121152958.e4fd76d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:29:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:18:24 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > The accounting code will be compiled in by default (CONFIG_READAHEAD_STATS=y),
> > and will remain inactive unless enabled explicitly with either boot option
> >
> > readahead_stats=1
> >
> > or through the debugfs interface
> >
> > echo 1 > /debug/readahead/stats_enable
>
> It's unfortunate that these two things have different names.
Yes unfortunately.
> I'd have thought that the debugfs knob was sufficient - no need for the
> boot option.
The boot option intents to catch the boot time readaheads.
However it's not that big deal, I'll drop the boot option.
> > The added overheads are two readahead_stats() calls per readahead.
> > Which is trivial costs unless there are concurrent random reads on
> > super fast SSDs, which may lead to cache bouncing when updating the
> > global ra_stats[][]. Considering that normal users won't need this
> > except when debugging performance problems, it's disabled by default.
> > So it looks reasonable to keep this debug code simple rather than trying
> > to improve its scalability.
>
> I may be wrong, but I don't think the CPU cost of this code matters a
> lot. People will rarely turn it on and disk IO is a lot slower than
> CPU actions and it's waaaaaaay more important to get high-quality info
> about readahead than it is to squeeze out a few CPU cycles.
Agreed in general.
> > @@ -51,6 +62,182 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(file_ra_state_init);
> >
> > #define list_to_page(head) (list_entry((head)->prev, struct page, lru))
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_READAHEAD_STATS
> > +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > +
> > +static u32 readahead_stats_enable __read_mostly;
> > +
> > +static int __init config_readahead_stats(char *str)
> > +{
> > + int enable = 1;
> > + get_option(&str, &enable);
> > + readahead_stats_enable = enable;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +early_param("readahead_stats", config_readahead_stats);
>
> Why use early_param() rather than plain old __setup()?
Heh it's a no-brain copy from other code ;)
Anyway, the readahead_stats boot parameter will be dropped.
> > +enum ra_account {
> > + /* number of readaheads */
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_COUNT, /* readahead request */
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_EOF, /* readahead request covers EOF */
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_CHIT, /* readahead request covers some cached pages */
>
> I don't like chit :) "cache_hit" would be better. Or just "hit".
Yeah it's not good. I renamed it to RA_ACCOUNT_CACHE_HIT.
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_ASIZE, /* readahead async size */
Also renamed that to RA_ACCOUNT_ASYNC_SIZE.
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_ACTUAL, /* readahead actual IO size */
> > + /* end mark */
> > + RA_ACCOUNT_MAX,
> > +};
> > +
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static void readahead_event(struct address_space *mapping,
> > + pgoff_t offset,
> > + unsigned long req_size,
> > + unsigned int ra_flags,
> > + pgoff_t start,
> > + unsigned int size,
> > + unsigned int async_size,
> > + unsigned int actual)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_READAHEAD_STATS
> > + if (readahead_stats_enable) {
> > + readahead_stats(mapping, offset, req_size, ra_flags,
> > + start, size, async_size, actual);
> > + readahead_stats(mapping, offset, req_size,
> > + RA_PATTERN_ALL << READAHEAD_PATTERN_SHIFT,
> > + start, size, async_size, actual);
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > +}
>
> The stub should be inlined, methinks. The overhead of evaluating and
> preparing eight arguments is significant. I don't think the compiler
> is yet smart enough to save us.
The parameter list actually becomes even out of control when doing the
bit fields:
+ readahead_event(mapping, offset, req_size,
+ ra->pattern, ra->for_mmap, ra->for_metadata,
+ ra->start + ra->size >= eof,
+ ra->start, ra->size, ra->async_size, actual);
So I end up passing file_ra_state around. The added cost is, I'll have
to dynamically create a file_ra_state for the fadvise case, which
should be acceptable since it's a cold path.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- linux-next.orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2011-11-21 17:08:38.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-next/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2011-11-21 17:08:51.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -2251,6 +2251,12 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes
> > This default max readahead size may be overrode
> > in some cases, notably NFS, btrfs and software RAID.
> >
> > + readahead_stats[=0|1]
> > + Enable/disable readahead stats accounting.
> > +
> > + It's also possible to enable/disable it after boot:
> > + echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/stats_enable
>
> Can the current setting be read back?
Yes. This is possible:
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/stats_enable
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-21 9:18 [PATCH 0/8] readahead stats/tracing, backwards prefetching and more Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: limit default readahead size for small devices Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 10:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-21 10:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-21 11:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 11:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 12:47 ` Andi Kleen
2011-11-21 12:47 ` Andi Kleen
2011-11-21 14:46 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-11-21 14:46 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-11-21 14:46 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-11-21 22:52 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 22:52 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 22:52 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-22 14:23 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-11-22 14:23 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-11-22 14:23 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-11-23 12:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-23 12:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] readahead: make default readahead size a kernel parameter Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 10:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-21 10:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-21 11:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 11:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-24 22:28 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-24 22:28 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-25 0:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-25 0:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-28 2:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-28 2:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-30 13:04 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2011-11-30 13:04 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2011-11-30 13:04 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2011-11-30 13:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-30 13:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-30 13:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-30 16:09 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-30 16:09 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-21 13:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-11-21 13:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-11-21 13:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 13:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] readahead: replace ra->mmap_miss with ra->ra_flags Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 11:04 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-11-21 11:04 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-11-21 11:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 11:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-23 12:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-23 12:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-23 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-23 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-29 3:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 3:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] readahead: record readahead patterns Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:19 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-29 2:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 2:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 14:17 ` Andi Kleen
2011-11-21 14:17 ` Andi Kleen
2011-11-22 14:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 14:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:32 ` Andi Kleen
2011-11-21 23:32 ` Andi Kleen
2011-11-29 3:23 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-11-29 3:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 4:49 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-29 4:49 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-29 6:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 6:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 12:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 12:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] readahead: add debug tracing event Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 14:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-21 14:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-21 9:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] readahead: basic support for backwards prefetching Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-29 3:08 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-29 3:08 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] readahead: dont do start-of-file readahead after lseek() Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-21 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-22 14:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-22 14:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 9:56 ` [PATCH 0/8] readahead stats/tracing, backwards prefetching and more Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-21 9:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-21 12:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-21 12:00 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111129032323.GC19506@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.