From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC 1/2] tile: don't panic on iomap
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:04:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111130070417.GA17781@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo4N8drqe5bHVjzXy_h0HTC8Reye4+8viN4c6TtmwFheXA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:04:12PM -0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I think panic on iomap is there just for debugging.
> > If we return NULL instead, the generic pci_iomap will
> > DTRT so we don't need to roll our own.
>
> Just to be explicit about what "doing the right thing" means, here's
> what I think is changing (I think the new behavior is OK, but it *is*
> different):
I think the change is that anyone calling ioport_map *directly*
will fail. pci_iomap callers are mostly unaffected.
>
> Old behavior: Caller calls pci_iomap(), which panics in ioport_map().
Not really, the old pci_iomap simply returned NULL in this case, it
did not call ioport_map.
> New behavior: Caller calls pci_iomap(), ioport_map() returns NULL,
> pci_iomap() returns NULL (failure), caller may check for failure. If
> caller does not check for failure and passes the NULL to
> ioread()/iowrite(), we WARN in bad_io_access().
>
> > static inline void __iomem *ioport_map(unsigned long port, unsigned int len)
> > {
> > - return (void __iomem *) ioport_panic();
> > + pr_info("Trying to map an IO resource - it does not exit on tile.\n");
> > + return NULL;
>
> s/exit/exist/
>
> Since we only expect to see this message during debugging, maybe it
> could be more informative, e.g., use dump_stack() to identify the
> offending driver? I don't think either the "Trying to map" message or
> the "Bad IO access" message is enough to actually make progress in
> debugging.
>
> Bjorn
As explained above, only direct callers of ioport_map get a changed
behaviour. If we start dumping stack there we will hurt users of
pci_iomap which used to get a graceful failure and will start getting
scary messages. Is does not seem to be worth doing to simplify debugging, right?
How about sticking the function name in the pr_info message?
A simple grep for ioport_map will then get you the culprit ...
Like this:
+ pr_info("ioport_map: mapping IO resources is unsupported on tile.\n");
?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-30 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-29 18:54 [PATCH-RFC 0/2] tile: switch to generic pci_iomap Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 18:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 18:54 ` [PATCH-RFC 1/2] tile: don't panic on iomap Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 18:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 21:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-11-30 7:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-11-29 22:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 7:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 9:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 11:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 14:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 14:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 15:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 15:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 18:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-01 17:59 ` [PATCH] lib/devres.c: allow specifying NO_IOPORT while using PCI Chris Metcalf
2011-12-01 17:59 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-12-01 18:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-01 18:48 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-12-01 18:48 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-12-01 22:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-02 18:48 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-12-02 18:48 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-12-05 15:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-05 20:08 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-12-05 20:08 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-11-30 9:08 ` [PATCH-RFC 1/2 v2] tile: don't panic on iomap Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 18:54 ` [PATCH-RFC 2/2] tile: switch to GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 18:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 21:19 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-11-30 21:19 ` Chris Metcalf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111130070417.GA17781@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.