Re: [rfc 2/3] fs, proc: Introduce the Children: line in /proc/<pid>/status

[Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>]

On Friday 02 December 2011 12:45:51, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:43:10PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> ...
> > >>
> > >> Yes, I like /children file. other points seems to be pointed out by other
> > >> reviewers. 
> > > 
> > > Any reason this is a file instead of a directory like /proc/PID/task/ ?
> > > 
> > > $ sudo ls /proc/8167/task/
> > > 8167  854  855  856  857  858  859
> > > $ sudo ls /proc/8167/task/855/
> > > attr    clear_refs  cpuset   exe     io       loginuid  mountinfo  oom_adj        pagemap      sched      smaps  statm    wchan
> > > auxv    cmdline     cwd      fd      latency  maps      mounts     oom_score      personality  schedstat  stack  status
> > > cgroup  comm        environ  fdinfo  limits   mem       numa_maps  oom_score_adj  root         sessionid  stat   syscall
> > > 
> > > Much easier to follow the chain from the command line this way.
> > 
> > What do you propose to put into these directories? Another directories named with
> > children pid-s?
> > 
> 
> Yes, I suppose additional directory/links and whatever would be just
> noneeded overhead.

/proc/8167/task/ being a directory could also be claimed
"noneeded overhead", yet it exists, and is very useful (I use
it a lot).  Why diverge instead of being consistent?

(Note that listing /proc only shows thread group ids, but
you can still open /proc/THREAD-ID/, so a /proc/PID/task file
with lists of pids would have been "good enough".)

-- 
Pedro Alves