From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi@remlab.net>
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:19:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112061619.31357.remi@remlab.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDE1D57.90307@linuxtv.org>
Le mardi 6 décembre 2011 15:49:11 Andreas Oberritter, vous avez écrit :
> You don't need to wait for write-only operations. Basically all demux
> ioctls are write-only. Since vtunerc is using dvb-core's software demux
> *locally*, errors for invalid arguments etc. will be returned as usual.
That's a limitation, not a feature.
You should not transmit unwanted programs over the network, nor copy them to
kernel space.
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-30 21:38 [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? HoP
2011-11-30 21:52 ` Michael Krufky
2011-12-01 0:09 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-01 11:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-01 14:58 ` HoP
2011-12-01 17:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-01 19:59 ` HoP
2011-12-01 20:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-01 22:55 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 11:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-02 11:40 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-02 11:48 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 12:05 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-02 11:57 ` HoP
2011-12-02 17:33 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[not found] ` <3D233F78EE854A4BA3D34C11AD4FAC1FDD141F@nasanexd01b.na.qualcomm.com>
2011-12-05 18:16 ` V4L2 driver node directory structure under /video directory Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-02 17:49 ` [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-02 18:16 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 18:28 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 23:19 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-03 0:37 ` HoP
2011-12-05 10:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-12-05 14:28 ` HoP
2011-12-05 15:16 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 15:18 ` Michael Krufky
2011-12-06 0:16 ` HoP
2011-12-05 17:39 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-05 20:41 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-05 20:55 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 21:20 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-05 21:54 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 11:18 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 12:01 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 13:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 13:35 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:13 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 14:38 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 15:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 15:36 ` Manu Abraham
2011-12-06 11:21 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 12:01 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:19 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 14:48 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 13:49 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-07 14:01 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 16:10 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-07 16:56 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 16:58 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 21:48 ` Patrick Dickey
2011-12-07 22:53 ` Honza Petrouš
2011-12-07 23:24 ` Peter Kolta
2011-12-07 23:55 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-11 18:45 ` Peter martin
2011-12-12 10:31 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 17:19 ` Manu Abraham
2011-12-06 0:07 ` HoP
2011-12-06 13:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 13:49 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:19 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont [this message]
2011-12-06 15:05 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:20 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 15:00 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 17:35 ` HoP
2011-12-03 16:13 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-03 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-03 17:38 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-03 17:21 ` VDR User
2011-12-03 17:42 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-03 17:48 ` Devin Heitmueller
2011-12-04 23:54 ` HoP
2011-12-03 18:13 ` Hans Petter Selasky
2011-12-05 0:05 ` HoP
2011-12-03 18:17 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-03 23:30 ` Walter Van Eetvelt
2011-12-04 0:14 ` VDR User
2011-12-04 14:44 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-04 23:22 ` HoP
2011-12-05 1:45 ` VDR User
2011-12-05 6:20 ` HoP
2011-12-01 11:50 ` Communication misunderstanding? (was: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?) Patrick Boettcher
2011-12-01 12:33 ` [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-01 14:39 ` HoP
2011-12-02 18:32 ` [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? VDR User
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112061619.31357.remi@remlab.net \
--to=remi@remlab.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.