From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: HoP <jpetrous@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Oberritter <obi@linuxtv.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:33:49 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED90BFD.3040805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJbz7-2EVgwPY0wkqPVCoOyH2gM_7pf0DzP-Lf4Y65uZpci9GQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 02-12-2011 09:57, HoP wrote:
> If you want to disscuss,
No, I don't want. There are architectural issues on your solution. As I said,
from the Kernel POV, just the network drivers is enough to run *any* client-server
solution on any OS that uses the TCP/IP stack. All streaming applications (DVB
or not) have their solution without requiring any virtual driver, using the TCP/IP
stack. You still think that your solution is technically better than theirs.
So, we agree do disagree on that matter.
From my side, I won't merge it due to the already explained reasons.
Mauro.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-02 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-30 21:38 [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? HoP
2011-11-30 21:52 ` Michael Krufky
2011-12-01 0:09 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-01 11:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-01 14:58 ` HoP
2011-12-01 17:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-01 19:59 ` HoP
2011-12-01 20:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-01 22:55 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 11:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-02 11:40 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-02 11:48 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 12:05 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-02 11:57 ` HoP
2011-12-02 17:33 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
[not found] ` <3D233F78EE854A4BA3D34C11AD4FAC1FDD141F@nasanexd01b.na.qualcomm.com>
2011-12-05 18:16 ` V4L2 driver node directory structure under /video directory Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-02 17:49 ` [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-02 18:16 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 18:28 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 23:19 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-03 0:37 ` HoP
2011-12-05 10:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-12-05 14:28 ` HoP
2011-12-05 15:16 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 15:18 ` Michael Krufky
2011-12-06 0:16 ` HoP
2011-12-05 17:39 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-05 20:41 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-05 20:55 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 21:20 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-05 21:54 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 11:18 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 12:01 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 13:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 13:35 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:13 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 14:38 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 15:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 15:36 ` Manu Abraham
2011-12-06 11:21 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 12:01 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:19 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 14:48 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 13:49 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-07 14:01 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 16:10 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-07 16:56 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 16:58 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 21:48 ` Patrick Dickey
2011-12-07 22:53 ` Honza Petrouš
2011-12-07 23:24 ` Peter Kolta
2011-12-07 23:55 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-11 18:45 ` Peter martin
2011-12-12 10:31 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 17:19 ` Manu Abraham
2011-12-06 0:07 ` HoP
2011-12-06 13:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 13:49 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:19 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-06 15:05 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:20 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 15:00 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 17:35 ` HoP
2011-12-03 16:13 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-03 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-03 17:38 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-03 17:21 ` VDR User
2011-12-03 17:42 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-03 17:48 ` Devin Heitmueller
2011-12-04 23:54 ` HoP
2011-12-03 18:13 ` Hans Petter Selasky
2011-12-05 0:05 ` HoP
2011-12-03 18:17 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-03 23:30 ` Walter Van Eetvelt
2011-12-04 0:14 ` VDR User
2011-12-04 14:44 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-04 23:22 ` HoP
2011-12-05 1:45 ` VDR User
2011-12-05 6:20 ` HoP
2011-12-01 11:50 ` Communication misunderstanding? (was: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?) Patrick Boettcher
2011-12-01 12:33 ` [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-01 14:39 ` HoP
2011-12-02 18:32 ` [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? VDR User
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED90BFD.3040805@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=jpetrous@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=obi@linuxtv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.