Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Jingoo Han]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr, Size: 1194 bytes --]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> To: Jingoo Han
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gregkh@suse.de;
> stern@rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim@samsung.com; yulgon.kim@samsung.com;
> jy0922.shim@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> 
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for Samsung
> > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310
> board
> > using EXYNOS4.
> 
> This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
Thanks.
[PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
[PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
[PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶Ç§vØ^–)Þº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±ºÆâžØ^n‡r¡ö¦zË\x1aëh™¨è­Ú&¢îý»\x05ËÛÔØï¦v¬Îf\x1dp)¹¹br	šê+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹\x1e®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ߢ^[f

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > To: Jingoo Han
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org; linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org;
> > linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org;
> > stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org; kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org; yulgon.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org;
> > jy0922.shim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for Samsung
> > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310
> > board
> > > using EXYNOS4.
> > 
> > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> Thanks.
> [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver

So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
right?

If so, then all three should go through a single tree.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > To: Jingoo Han
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-usb at vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at suse.de;
> > stern at rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim at samsung.com; yulgon.kim at samsung.com;
> > jy0922.shim at samsung.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for Samsung
> > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310
> > board
> > > using EXYNOS4.
> > 
> > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> Thanks.
> [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver

So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
right?

If so, then all three should go through a single tree.

greg k-h

RE: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Kukjin Kim]

Greg KH wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gregkh@suse.de;
> > > stern@rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim@samsung.com;
> yulgon.kim@samsung.com;
> > > jy0922.shim@samsung.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> Samsung
> > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310
> > > board
> > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > >
> > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > Thanks.
> > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> 
Hi Greg,

Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...

Anyway,

> So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> right?
> 
> If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> 
Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can avoid
useless conflicts.

I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
with my ack?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

[PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Kukjin Kim]

Greg KH wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-usb at vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at suse.de;
> > > stern at rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim at samsung.com;
> yulgon.kim at samsung.com;
> > > jy0922.shim at samsung.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> Samsung
> > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310
> > > board
> > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > >
> > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > Thanks.
> > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> 
Hi Greg,

Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...

Anyway,

> So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> right?
> 
> If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> 
Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can avoid
useless conflicts.

I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
with my ack?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:10:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org; linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org;
> > > > linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org;
> > > > stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org; kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org;
> > yulgon.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org;
> > > > jy0922.shim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > Hello.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> > Samsung
> > > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310
> > > > board
> > > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > > >
> > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > > Thanks.
> > > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> > 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...
> 
> Anyway,
> 
> > So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> > means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> > right?
> > 
> > If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> > 
> Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can avoid
> useless conflicts.
> 
> I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
> updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
> with my ack?

The samsung tree is fine to take these, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:10:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-usb at vger.kernel.org;
> > > > linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at suse.de;
> > > > stern at rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim at samsung.com;
> > yulgon.kim at samsung.com;
> > > > jy0922.shim at samsung.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > Hello.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> > Samsung
> > > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on SMDKV310
> > > > board
> > > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > > >
> > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > > Thanks.
> > > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> > 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...
> 
> Anyway,
> 
> > So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> > means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> > right?
> > 
> > If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> > 
> Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can avoid
> useless conflicts.
> 
> I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
> updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
> with my ack?

The samsung tree is fine to take these, thanks.

greg k-h

RE: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Kukjin Kim]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:58 AM
> To: Kukjin Kim
> Cc: 'Jingoo Han'; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gregkh@suse.de;
> stern@rowland.harvard.edu; 'Yulgon Kim'; 'Shim Joonyoung'
> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> 
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:10:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> usb@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > > linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gregkh@suse.de;
> > > > > stern@rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim@samsung.com;
> > > yulgon.kim@samsung.com;
> > > > > jy0922.shim@samsung.com
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and
> driver
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > > Hello.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> > > Samsung
> > > > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on
> SMDKV310
> > > > > board
> > > > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > > > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > > > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > > > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > > > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> > >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...
> >
> > Anyway,
> >
> > > So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> > > means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> > > right?
> > >
> > > If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> > >
> > Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can
> avoid
> > useless conflicts.
> >
> > I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
> > updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
> > with my ack?
> 
> The samsung tree is fine to take these, thanks.
> 
Hi Greg,

OK, let me pick this up in my tree...so, when I apply, may I can have a ack
from you on 3rd patch?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

[PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Kukjin Kim]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:58 AM
> To: Kukjin Kim
> Cc: 'Jingoo Han'; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
> usb at vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at suse.de;
> stern at rowland.harvard.edu; 'Yulgon Kim'; 'Shim Joonyoung'
> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> 
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:10:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
> usb at vger.kernel.org;
> > > > > linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at suse.de;
> > > > > stern at rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim at samsung.com;
> > > yulgon.kim at samsung.com;
> > > > > jy0922.shim at samsung.com
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and
> driver
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > > Hello.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> > > Samsung
> > > > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on
> SMDKV310
> > > > > board
> > > > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > > > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > > > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > > > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > > > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> > >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...
> >
> > Anyway,
> >
> > > So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> > > means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> > > right?
> > >
> > > If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> > >
> > Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can
> avoid
> > useless conflicts.
> >
> > I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
> > updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
> > with my ack?
> 
> The samsung tree is fine to take these, thanks.
> 
Hi Greg,

OK, let me pick this up in my tree...so, when I apply, may I can have a ack
from you on 3rd patch?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 01:38:24PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:58 AM
> > To: Kukjin Kim
> > Cc: 'Jingoo Han'; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gregkh@suse.de;
> > stern@rowland.harvard.edu; 'Yulgon Kim'; 'Shim Joonyoung'
> > Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:10:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Greg KH wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > > > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > usb@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > > > linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gregkh@suse.de;
> > > > > > stern@rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim@samsung.com;
> > > > yulgon.kim@samsung.com;
> > > > > > jy0922.shim@samsung.com
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and
> > driver
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> > > > Samsung
> > > > > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on
> > SMDKV310
> > > > > > board
> > > > > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > > > > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > > > > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > > > > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > > > > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> > > >
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...
> > >
> > > Anyway,
> > >
> > > > So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> > > > means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> > > > right?
> > > >
> > > > If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> > > >
> > > Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can
> > avoid
> > > useless conflicts.
> > >
> > > I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
> > > updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
> > > with my ack?
> > 
> > The samsung tree is fine to take these, thanks.
> > 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> OK, let me pick this up in my tree...so, when I apply, may I can have a ack
> from you on 3rd patch?

Yes, feel free to add:
	Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

[PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 01:38:24PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:58 AM
> > To: Kukjin Kim
> > Cc: 'Jingoo Han'; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > usb at vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at suse.de;
> > stern at rowland.harvard.edu; 'Yulgon Kim'; 'Shim Joonyoung'
> > Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:10:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Greg KH wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg at kroah.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > > > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > usb at vger.kernel.org;
> > > > > > linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at suse.de;
> > > > > > stern at rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim at samsung.com;
> > > > yulgon.kim at samsung.com;
> > > > > > jy0922.shim at samsung.com
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and
> > driver
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> > > > Samsung
> > > > > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on
> > SMDKV310
> > > > > > board
> > > > > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > > > > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > > > > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > > > > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > > > > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> > > >
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...
> > >
> > > Anyway,
> > >
> > > > So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> > > > means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> > > > right?
> > > >
> > > > If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> > > >
> > > Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can
> > avoid
> > > useless conflicts.
> > >
> > > I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
> > > updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
> > > with my ack?
> > 
> > The samsung tree is fine to take these, thanks.
> > 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> OK, let me pick this up in my tree...so, when I apply, may I can have a ack
> from you on 3rd patch?

Yes, feel free to add:
	Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>