* Scheduler model, revisited
@ 2011-12-13 19:17 Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2011-12-13 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pjt; +Cc: linux-rt-users
Hello, Paul,
Back in Prague, you mentioned that a number of your scheduler-parameter
measurements were poor fits for the exponential distribution. Are they
a reasonable fit for a series of exponentially distributed Markov states?
For example, would they fit something of the following form?
a^2*t*e^(-a*t)
Or would a three-step series fit better?
(a^3*t^2*e^(-a*t))/2
And there is always the four-step series:
(a^4*t^3*e^(-a*t))/6
Or, in general:
(a^n*t^(n-1)*e^(-a*t))/(n-1)!
But please keep in mind that higher orders multiply my state space by
the number of steps in the series. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-12-13 19:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-13 19:17 Scheduler model, revisited Paul E. McKenney
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.