From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] memcg: simplify LRU handling by new rule
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:48:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111219154817.GD1415@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111214165226.1c3b666e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:52:26PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Now, at LRU handling, memory cgroup needs to do complicated works
> to see valid pc->mem_cgroup, which may be overwritten.
>
> This patch is for relaxing the protocol. This patch guarantees
> - when pc->mem_cgroup is overwritten, page must not be on LRU.
>
> By this, LRU routine can believe pc->mem_cgroup and don't need to
> check bits on pc->flags. This new rule may adds small overheads to
> swapin. But in most case, lru handling gets faster.
>
> After this patch, PCG_ACCT_LRU bit is obsolete and removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> ---
> include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 8 -----
> mm/memcontrol.c | 72 ++++++++++--------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
This, too, speaks for itself and the logic seems sound to me.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Minor style things:
> @@ -974,30 +974,8 @@ struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_lru_add_list(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> return &zone->lruvec;
>
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> - VM_BUG_ON(PageCgroupAcctLRU(pc));
> - /*
> - * putback: charge:
> - * SetPageLRU SetPageCgroupUsed
> - * smp_mb smp_mb
> - * PageCgroupUsed && add to memcg LRU PageLRU && add to memcg LRU
> - *
> - * Ensure that one of the two sides adds the page to the memcg
> - * LRU during a race.
> - */
> - smp_mb();
> - /*
> - * If the page is uncharged, it may be freed soon, but it
> - * could also be swap cache (readahead, swapoff) that needs to
> - * be reclaimable in the future. root_mem_cgroup will babysit
> - * it for the time being.
> - */
> - if (PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> - /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
> - smp_rmb();
> - memcg = pc->mem_cgroup;
> - SetPageCgroupAcctLRU(pc);
> - } else
> - memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
> + memcg = pc->mem_cgroup;
> + VM_BUG_ON(!memcg);
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, page);
I think the memcg local variable is not really needed anymore.
Also, please don't add bug-ons for simple NULL tests, they are
redundant when the dereference would blow up just as well.
> @@ -2399,6 +2368,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head)
> {
> struct page_cgroup *head_pc = lookup_page_cgroup(head);
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> + enum lru_list lru;
> int i;
You broke the reverse christmas tree sorting!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] memcg: simplify LRU handling by new rule
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:48:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111219154817.GD1415@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111214165226.1c3b666e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:52:26PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Now, at LRU handling, memory cgroup needs to do complicated works
> to see valid pc->mem_cgroup, which may be overwritten.
>
> This patch is for relaxing the protocol. This patch guarantees
> - when pc->mem_cgroup is overwritten, page must not be on LRU.
>
> By this, LRU routine can believe pc->mem_cgroup and don't need to
> check bits on pc->flags. This new rule may adds small overheads to
> swapin. But in most case, lru handling gets faster.
>
> After this patch, PCG_ACCT_LRU bit is obsolete and removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> ---
> include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 8 -----
> mm/memcontrol.c | 72 ++++++++++--------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
This, too, speaks for itself and the logic seems sound to me.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Minor style things:
> @@ -974,30 +974,8 @@ struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_lru_add_list(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> return &zone->lruvec;
>
> pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> - VM_BUG_ON(PageCgroupAcctLRU(pc));
> - /*
> - * putback: charge:
> - * SetPageLRU SetPageCgroupUsed
> - * smp_mb smp_mb
> - * PageCgroupUsed && add to memcg LRU PageLRU && add to memcg LRU
> - *
> - * Ensure that one of the two sides adds the page to the memcg
> - * LRU during a race.
> - */
> - smp_mb();
> - /*
> - * If the page is uncharged, it may be freed soon, but it
> - * could also be swap cache (readahead, swapoff) that needs to
> - * be reclaimable in the future. root_mem_cgroup will babysit
> - * it for the time being.
> - */
> - if (PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> - /* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
> - smp_rmb();
> - memcg = pc->mem_cgroup;
> - SetPageCgroupAcctLRU(pc);
> - } else
> - memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
> + memcg = pc->mem_cgroup;
> + VM_BUG_ON(!memcg);
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, page);
I think the memcg local variable is not really needed anymore.
Also, please don't add bug-ons for simple NULL tests, they are
redundant when the dereference would blow up just as well.
> @@ -2399,6 +2368,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head)
> {
> struct page_cgroup *head_pc = lookup_page_cgroup(head);
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> + enum lru_list lru;
> int i;
You broke the reverse christmas tree sorting!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-19 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-14 7:47 [PATCH 0/4] memcg: simplify LRU handling KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-14 7:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-14 7:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: simplify page cache charging KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-14 7:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-16 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-16 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-19 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-19 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-20 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-20 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-21 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-21 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-19 15:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-12-19 15:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-12-20 15:33 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-20 15:33 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-14 7:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: simplify corner case handling of LRU KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-14 7:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-19 15:14 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-12-19 15:14 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-12-20 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-20 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-14 7:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] memcg: clear pc->mem_cgorup if necessary KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-14 7:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-16 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-16 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-19 15:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-12-19 15:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-12-20 0:35 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-12-20 0:35 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-12-20 15:56 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-20 15:56 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-14 7:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] memcg: simplify LRU handling by new rule KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-14 7:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-19 15:48 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2011-12-19 15:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-12-20 16:16 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-20 16:16 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-21 0:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-21 0:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-21 6:56 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-21 6:56 ` Michal Hocko
2011-12-19 15:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] memcg: simplify LRU handling Johannes Weiner
2011-12-19 15:56 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111219154817.GD1415@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.