Re: Android low memory killer vs. memory pressure notifications

[Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:12:09AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > page_cgroup is 16B per page and with the current Johannes' memcg
> > naturalization work (in the mmotm tree) we are down to 8B per page (we
> > got rid of lru). Kamezawa has some patches to get rid of the flags so we
> > will be down to 4B per page on 32b. Is this still too much?
> > I would be really careful about a yet another lowmem notification
> > mechanism.
> > 
> 
> There was always general interest in a low memory notification mechanism 
> even prior to memcg, see http://lwn.net/Articles/268732/ from Marcelo and 
> KOSAKI-san.  The desire is not only to avoid the metadata overhead of 
> memcg, but also to avoid cgroups entirely.

Hm, assuming that metadata is no longer an issue, why do you think avoiding
cgroups would be a good idea?

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>