From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Borderline fixes for v3.2-rc6
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:10:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111220171041.GA24444@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMj-OyDu9pcOZ20o6G0W3-kkxyHF7o5DqDRaQkkUDf98CA@mail.gmail.com>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [111219 20:20]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > Hi Arnd & Olof,
> >
> > Here are two fixes that could potentially go into v3.2 -rc cycle.
> >
> > One fixes a harmless but annoying warning that happens on omap 34xx
> > processors during boot. The other one fixes booting on pretty rare
> > secure mode development board, but that's fixed in "features that
> > never worked earlier either" style.
> >
> > We can surely wait on these fixes, but if you have something going
> > upstream anyways, then these might be worth considering too.
>
> The hwmod patch is a regression so that one I'll take, the other one
> is a little less obvious that it should go in now. Also, shouldn't it
> be cc:d stable in that case?
Yes let's not worry about the second one, it adds new functionality and
it's for a currently rare case.
> Let me know what you prefer (rebase with a cc: stable) or take out the
> secure mode patch. I'm collecting a small series of fixes so I'll pull
> it in tomorrow for that.
I've branched it out into fixes-hwmod-regression with just that
same commit in it. The second patch in this series will be pulled in
with fixes-non-critical-part2. Updated pull request below.
Regards,
Tony
The following changes since commit e5fe29c7198a1f6616286dfc8602a69da165cb3f:
Felipe Contreras (1):
ARM: OMAP: rx51: fix USB
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap fixes-hwmod-regression
Felipe Contreras (1):
ARM: OMAP: hwmod data: fix iva and mailbox hwmods for OMAP 3
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c | 4 ----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] Borderline fixes for v3.2-rc6
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:10:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111220171041.GA24444@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMj-OyDu9pcOZ20o6G0W3-kkxyHF7o5DqDRaQkkUDf98CA@mail.gmail.com>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [111219 20:20]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > Hi Arnd & Olof,
> >
> > Here are two fixes that could potentially go into v3.2 -rc cycle.
> >
> > One fixes a harmless but annoying warning that happens on omap 34xx
> > processors during boot. The other one fixes booting on pretty rare
> > secure mode development board, but that's fixed in "features that
> > never worked earlier either" style.
> >
> > We can surely wait on these fixes, but if you have something going
> > upstream anyways, then these might be worth considering too.
>
> The hwmod patch is a regression so that one I'll take, the other one
> is a little less obvious that it should go in now. Also, shouldn't it
> be cc:d stable in that case?
Yes let's not worry about the second one, it adds new functionality and
it's for a currently rare case.
> Let me know what you prefer (rebase with a cc: stable) or take out the
> secure mode patch. I'm collecting a small series of fixes so I'll pull
> it in tomorrow for that.
I've branched it out into fixes-hwmod-regression with just that
same commit in it. The second patch in this series will be pulled in
with fixes-non-critical-part2. Updated pull request below.
Regards,
Tony
The following changes since commit e5fe29c7198a1f6616286dfc8602a69da165cb3f:
Felipe Contreras (1):
ARM: OMAP: rx51: fix USB
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap fixes-hwmod-regression
Felipe Contreras (1):
ARM: OMAP: hwmod data: fix iva and mailbox hwmods for OMAP 3
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c | 4 ----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-20 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-19 19:42 [GIT PULL] Borderline fixes for v3.2-rc6 Tony Lindgren
2011-12-19 19:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-20 4:52 ` Olof Johansson
2011-12-20 4:52 ` Olof Johansson
2011-12-20 17:10 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-12-20 17:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-20 18:01 ` Olof Johansson
2011-12-20 18:01 ` Olof Johansson
2011-12-22 17:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-22 17:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-22 17:14 ` Olof Johansson
2011-12-22 17:14 ` Olof Johansson
2011-12-22 17:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-12-22 17:21 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111220171041.GA24444@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.