All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	david@fromorbit.com,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: br_write_lock locks on possible CPUs other than online CPUs
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:58:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111220195806.GF23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EF0DE04.6030604@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:42:04AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> register_hotcpu_notifier(...);
> grab spinlock
> for_each_online_cpu(N)
>   add N to bitmap
> release spinlock
> 
> because the latter code is not fully race-free (because we don't handle
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE event in the callback and hence cpu_online_mask can get
> updated in-between). But it would still work since cpus going down don't
> really pose problems for us.

Um?  Sure, that loop can end up adding CPUs on their way down into the set.
And as soon as they get their CPU_DEAD, notifier will prune them out...  Or
is there something I'm missing here?  Anyway, the variant I have here
(untested) follows:

diff --git a/include/linux/lglock.h b/include/linux/lglock.h
index f549056..1951f67 100644
--- a/include/linux/lglock.h
+++ b/include/linux/lglock.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 
 /* can make br locks by using local lock for read side, global lock for write */
 #define br_lock_init(name)	name##_lock_init()
@@ -72,9 +73,31 @@
 
 #define DEFINE_LGLOCK(name)						\
 									\
+ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(name##_cpu_lock);					\
+ cpumask_t name##_cpus __read_mostly;					\
  DEFINE_PER_CPU(arch_spinlock_t, name##_lock);				\
  DEFINE_LGLOCK_LOCKDEP(name);						\
 									\
+ static int								\
+ name##_lg_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,			\
+				unsigned long action, void *hcpu)	\
+ {									\
+	switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {				\
+	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:						\
+		spin_lock(&name##_cpu_lock);				\
+		cpu_set((unsigned long)hcpu, name##_cpus);		\
+		spin_unlock(&name##_cpu_lock);				\
+		break;							\
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED: case CPU_DEAD:				\
+		spin_lock(&name##_cpu_lock);				\
+		cpu_clear((unsigned long)hcpu, name##_cpus);		\
+		spin_unlock(&name##_cpu_lock);				\
+	}								\
+	return NOTIFY_OK;						\
+ }									\
+ static struct notifier_block name##_lg_cpu_notifier = {		\
+	.notifier_call = name##_lg_cpu_callback,			\
+ };									\
  void name##_lock_init(void) {						\
 	int i;								\
 	LOCKDEP_INIT_MAP(&name##_lock_dep_map, #name, &name##_lock_key, 0); \
@@ -83,6 +106,11 @@
 		lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i);			\
 		*lock = (arch_spinlock_t)__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;	\
 	}								\
+	register_hotcpu_notifier(&name##_lg_cpu_notifier);		\
+	spin_lock(&name##_cpu_lock);					\
+	for_each_online_cpu(i)						\
+		cpu_set(i, name##_cpus);				\
+	spin_unlock(&name##_cpu_lock);					\
  }									\
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(name##_lock_init);					\
 									\
@@ -124,9 +152,9 @@
 									\
  void name##_global_lock_online(void) {					\
 	int i;								\
-	preempt_disable();						\
+	spin_lock(&name##_cpu_lock);					\
 	rwlock_acquire(&name##_lock_dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);		\
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {					\
+	for_each_cpu(i, &name##_cpus) {					\
 		arch_spinlock_t *lock;					\
 		lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i);			\
 		arch_spin_lock(lock);					\
@@ -137,12 +165,12 @@
  void name##_global_unlock_online(void) {				\
 	int i;								\
 	rwlock_release(&name##_lock_dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);		\
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {					\
+	for_each_cpu(i, &name##_cpus) {					\
 		arch_spinlock_t *lock;					\
 		lock = &per_cpu(name##_lock, i);			\
 		arch_spin_unlock(lock);					\
 	}								\
-	preempt_enable();						\
+	spin_unlock(&name##_cpu_lock);					\
  }									\
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(name##_global_unlock_online);				\
 									\

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-20 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-19  3:36 [PATCH] VFS: br_write_lock locks on possible CPUs other than online CPUs mengcong
2011-12-19  4:11 ` Al Viro
2011-12-19  5:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-19  6:07     ` mengcong
2011-12-19  7:31 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-19  9:12   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-12-19 11:03     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-19 12:11       ` Al Viro
2011-12-19 20:23         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-19 20:52           ` Al Viro
2011-12-20  4:56             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20  6:27               ` Al Viro
2011-12-20  7:28                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20  9:37                   ` mengcong
2011-12-20 10:36                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 11:08                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 12:50                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 14:06                           ` Al Viro
2011-12-20 14:35                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 17:59                               ` Al Viro
2011-12-20 19:12                                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-20 19:58                                   ` Al Viro [this message]
2011-12-20 22:27                                     ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-20 23:31                                       ` Al Viro
2011-12-21 21:15                                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-21 22:02                                       ` Al Viro
2011-12-21 22:12                                       ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22  7:02                                         ` Al Viro
2011-12-22  7:20                                           ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22  8:08                                             ` Al Viro
2011-12-22  8:17                                               ` Andi Kleen
2011-12-22  8:39                                                 ` Al Viro
2011-12-22  8:22                                             ` Andi Kleen
2011-12-20  7:30                 ` mengcong
2011-12-20  7:37                   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-12-19 23:56         ` Dave Chinner
2011-12-20  4:05           ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111220195806.GF23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
    --cc=mc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.