All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Simon Chen <simonchennj@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: under-performing bonded interfaces
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:36:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111221173608.0f04bc8b@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANj2Eben0hrP6KwxyA1WPqiqzm84w=J2_sdtrKtGvxdftuksqg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:26:04 -0500
Simon Chen <simonchennj@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> I added an Intel X520 card to both the sender and receiver... Now I
> have two 10G ports on a PCIe 2.0 x8 slot (5Gx8), so the bandwidth of
> the PCI bus shouldn't be the bottleneck.
> 
> Now the throughput test gives me around 16Gbps in aggregate. Any ideas
> how I can push closer to 20G? I don't quite understand where the
> bottleneck is now.

In my experience, Intel dual port cards can not run at full speed
when both ports are in use. You need separate slots to hit full
line rate.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-22  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-16 23:44 under-performing bonded interfaces Simon Chen
2011-11-17  0:01 ` Ben Greear
2011-11-17  0:05   ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17  0:07     ` Ben Greear
2011-11-17  0:57     ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-17  1:38       ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17  1:45         ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17  1:45         ` Rick Jones
2011-11-17  2:51         ` Ben Hutchings
2011-12-22  1:26           ` Simon Chen
2011-12-22  1:36             ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2011-12-22  3:31               ` Ben Greear
2011-12-22  2:28             ` Simon Chen
2011-12-22  5:43             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-23 15:03               ` Simon Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111221173608.0f04bc8b@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simonchennj@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.