From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Simon Chen <simonchennj@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: under-performing bonded interfaces
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:07:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EC45052.10101@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANj2EbfrtbysEbj+gMa+fOhWo0EWjBXVyGkw8WyiPAV9nPduuQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/16/2011 04:05 PM, Simon Chen wrote:
> If used independently, I can get around 9.8Gbps.
On each of them concurrently, or just one at a time?
> [ 11.572857] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: Multiqueue Enabled: Rx Queue count
> = 24, Tx Queue count = 24
> [ 11.572861] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: (PCI Express:5.0Gb/s:Width x4)
> e8:9a:8f:23:42:1a
> [ 11.572943] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: MAC: 2, PHY: 8, SFP+: 3, PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF
> [ 11.572944] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: PCI-Express bandwidth available for
> this card is not sufficient for optimal performance.
> [ 11.572946] ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: For optimal performance a x8
> PCI-Express slot is required.
Looks to me like it may be hardware related unless you are certain you
can get both NICs running at high-speed independently of any bonding
code...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-17 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-16 23:44 under-performing bonded interfaces Simon Chen
2011-11-17 0:01 ` Ben Greear
2011-11-17 0:05 ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17 0:07 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2011-11-17 0:57 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-17 1:38 ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17 1:45 ` Simon Chen
2011-11-17 1:45 ` Rick Jones
2011-11-17 2:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-12-22 1:26 ` Simon Chen
2011-12-22 1:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-22 3:31 ` Ben Greear
2011-12-22 2:28 ` Simon Chen
2011-12-22 5:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-23 15:03 ` Simon Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EC45052.10101@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simonchennj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.