All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Cc: "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] RPCBIND: add anonymous listening socket in addition to named one
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:22:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111228182213.GA10220@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EFB330A.7070908@parallels.com>

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 07:17:30PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> I've experienced a problem with registering Lockd service with
> rpcbind in container. My container operates in it's own network
> namespace context and has it's own root. But on service register,
> kernel tries to connect to named unix socket by using
> rpciod_workqueue. Thus any connect is done with the same fs->root,

There's no way to pass the correct context down to the rpc task and from
there to the registration code?

--b.

> and this leads to that kernel socket, used for registering service
> with local portmapper, will always connect to the same user-space
> socket regardless to fs->root of process, requested register
> operation.
> Possible solution for this problem, which I would like to discuss,
> is to add one more listening socket to rpcbind process. But this one
> should be anonymous. Anonymous unix sockets accept connections only
> within it's network namespace context, so kernel socket connect will
> be done always to the user-space socket in the same network
> namespace.
> Does anyone have any objections to this? Or, probably, better
> solution for the problem?
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Stanislav Kinsbursky

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-28 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-28 15:17 [RFC] RPCBIND: add anonymous listening socket in addition to named one Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-28 17:03 ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-28 17:30   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-28 17:59     ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-29 11:48       ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-29 16:03         ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-29 16:12           ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-29 16:23             ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-29 17:04               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-29 17:42               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-25 11:12                 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-25 14:41                   ` bfields
2012-01-25 16:02                     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-28 18:22 ` bfields [this message]
2011-12-29 11:48   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111228182213.GA10220@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.