All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] RPCBIND: add anonymous listening socket in addition to named one
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:48:46 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EFC539E.4050008@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111228182213.GA10220@fieldses.org>

28.12.2011 22:22, bfields@fieldses.org пишет:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 07:17:30PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> I've experienced a problem with registering Lockd service with
>> rpcbind in container. My container operates in it's own network
>> namespace context and has it's own root. But on service register,
>> kernel tries to connect to named unix socket by using
>> rpciod_workqueue. Thus any connect is done with the same fs->root,
>
> There's no way to pass the correct context down to the rpc task and from
> there to the registration code?
>

This context is current->fs->root. It's used to lookup unix socket inode by name 
on connect.
Obviously, current is always "rpciod_workqueue" kernel thread. And thus has the 
same root.
The only solution how to pass and use the context, which I can see, is to expand 
sock_xprt with a pointer to corrent root and then set this root before 
kernel_connect() and set the old one after.
But this looks ugly and too complicated for the issue, from my pow.
Or maybe you have some more elegant solution to this problem?

-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky

      reply	other threads:[~2011-12-29 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-28 15:17 [RFC] RPCBIND: add anonymous listening socket in addition to named one Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-28 17:03 ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-28 17:30   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-28 17:59     ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-29 11:48       ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-29 16:03         ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-29 16:12           ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-29 16:23             ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-29 17:04               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-29 17:42               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-25 11:12                 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-25 14:41                   ` bfields
2012-01-25 16:02                     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-28 18:22 ` bfields
2011-12-29 11:48   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EFC539E.4050008@parallels.com \
    --to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.