All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: new check 278 to ensure btrfs backref integrity
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:39:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120104163946.GA8153@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324552138-30584-1-git-send-email-list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:08:58PM +0100, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> This is a btrfs specific scratch test checking the backref walker. It
> creates a file system with compressed and uncompressed data extents, picks
> files randomly and uses filefrag to get their extents. It then asks the
> btrfs utility (inspect-internal) to do the backref resolving from fs-logical
> address (the one filefrag calls "physical") back to the inode number and
> file-logical offset, verifying the result.

I was about to apply this, but for some reason it fails for me when
running xfstest on xfs:

276	 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see 276.out.bad)
--- 276.out	2012-01-04 16:14:36.000000000 +0000
+++ 276.out.bad	2012-01-04 16:32:26.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
QA output created by 276
-*** test backref walking
-*** done
+common.rc: Error: $TEST_DEV (/dev/vdb1) is not a MOUNTED btrfs
filesystem
+Filesystem    Type   1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
+/dev/vdb1      xfs    39042944     32928  39010016   1% /mnt/test
 *** unmount

which is a bit confusing

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: new check 278 to ensure btrfs backref integrity
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:39:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120104163946.GA8153@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324552138-30584-1-git-send-email-list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:08:58PM +0100, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> This is a btrfs specific scratch test checking the backref walker. It
> creates a file system with compressed and uncompressed data extents, picks
> files randomly and uses filefrag to get their extents. It then asks the
> btrfs utility (inspect-internal) to do the backref resolving from fs-logical
> address (the one filefrag calls "physical") back to the inode number and
> file-logical offset, verifying the result.

I was about to apply this, but for some reason it fails for me when
running xfstest on xfs:

276	 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see 276.out.bad)
--- 276.out	2012-01-04 16:14:36.000000000 +0000
+++ 276.out.bad	2012-01-04 16:32:26.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
QA output created by 276
-*** test backref walking
-*** done
+common.rc: Error: $TEST_DEV (/dev/vdb1) is not a MOUNTED btrfs
filesystem
+Filesystem    Type   1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
+/dev/vdb1      xfs    39042944     32928  39010016   1% /mnt/test
 *** unmount

which is a bit confusing

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-04 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-22 11:08 [PATCH v2] xfstests: new check 278 to ensure btrfs backref integrity Jan Schmidt
2011-12-22 11:08 ` Jan Schmidt
2012-01-04 16:39 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2012-01-04 16:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-04 17:01   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-01-04 17:01     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-01-04 17:04     ` Jan Schmidt
2012-01-04 17:04       ` Jan Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120104163946.GA8153@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.