All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Cc: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: evdev - Add EVIOC mechanism to extract the MT slot state
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:03:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120106200332.GC23619@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F074CAE.7010205@canonical.com>

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:34:06AM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 11:18 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:55:44PM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> >>> 2 different processes should be fine; the problem would be if 2 threads
> >>> of the same process share the same file descriptor. So far the rest of
> >>> evdev copes just fine with multiple threads using the same fd (all
> >>> operations are atomic in this regard), setting ABS_MT_SLOT before
> >>> fetching the state break this property.
> >>
> >> Are we talking about the need for a per-client mutex, or something
> >> more subtle, like introducing indirect coupling between threads
> >> through per-client states? The former ought to be easily remedied.
> > 
> > Ok, maybe not to so easy after all, which probably answers my own
> > question. Looks like a EVIOCGMTSLOT, taking both slot and event code
> > as argument, would be the cleaner route to take. Another ioctl, how do we
> > feel about that?
> 
> What's the problem with userspace locking?

It relies on userspace? ;)

-- 
Dmitry

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-06 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-06 15:16 [PATCH v2] Input: evdev - Add EVIOC mechanism to extract the MT slot state Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 16:25 ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 18:00 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2012-01-06 18:00   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2012-01-06 18:18   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 18:55     ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 19:18       ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 19:34         ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 19:48           ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 20:02             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 20:14               ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 20:23                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 20:30                   ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 20:03           ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2012-01-06 18:56     ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 19:58       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 20:09         ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 20:17           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 20:44             ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 18:45   ` Henrik Rydberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120106200332.GC23619@core.coreip.homeip.net \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com \
    --cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rydberg@euromail.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.