From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ken@codelabs.ch
Subject: sha512: make it work, undo percpu message schedule
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:00:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120111000040.GA3801@p183.telecom.by> (raw)
commit f9e2bca6c22d75a289a349f869701214d63b5060
aka "crypto: sha512 - Move message schedule W[80] to static percpu area"
created global message schedule area.
If sha512_update will ever be entered twice, hilarity ensures.
Probably the easiest way to notice incorrect hashes being calculated is
to run 2 ping floods over AH with hmac(sha512):
#!/usr/sbin/setkey -f
flush;
spdflush;
add IP1 IP2 ah 25 -A hmac-sha512 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000025;
add IP2 IP1 ah 52 -A hmac-sha512 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000052;
spdadd IP1 IP2 any -P out ipsec ah/transport//require;
spdadd IP2 IP1 any -P in ipsec ah/transport//require;
XfrmInStateProtoError will start ticking with -EBADMSG being returned
from ah_input(). This never happens with, say, hmac(sha1).
I personally don't understand this changelog entry:
"The message schedule W (u64[80]) is too big for the stack."
Hash context is dynamically allocated.
W[80] stack usage can be trimmed like in SHA-1, this is for separate patch.
P. S.: If only one ping flood runs, XfrmInStateProtoError will also tick
but very slowly. I personally can't explain this.
With patch applied (on BOTH sides), XfrmInStateProtoError does not tick
with multiple bidirectional ping flood streams like it doesn't tick
with SHA-1.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
---
crypto/sha512_generic.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/crypto/sha512_generic.c
+++ b/crypto/sha512_generic.c
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64[80], msg_schedule);
-
static inline u64 Ch(u64 x, u64 y, u64 z)
{
return z ^ (x & (y ^ z));
@@ -89,7 +87,7 @@ sha512_transform(u64 *state, const u8 *input)
u64 a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, t1, t2;
int i;
- u64 *W = get_cpu_var(msg_schedule);
+ u64 W[80];
/* load the input */
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
@@ -128,8 +126,6 @@ sha512_transform(u64 *state, const u8 *input)
/* erase our data */
a = b = c = d = e = f = g = h = t1 = t2 = 0;
- memset(W, 0, sizeof(__get_cpu_var(msg_schedule)));
- put_cpu_var(msg_schedule);
}
static int
next reply other threads:[~2012-01-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-11 0:00 Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2012-01-11 0:12 ` sha512: make it work, undo percpu message schedule Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-11 0:36 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-12 23:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-13 0:19 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-13 7:08 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-13 10:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-13 10:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-13 10:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-13 11:33 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-13 12:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-14 18:20 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-14 18:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] sha512: reduce stack usage to safe number Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-14 18:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] sha512: use standard ror64() Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-14 19:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] sha512: reduce stack usage to safe number Linus Torvalds
2012-01-14 20:41 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-14 21:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-16 9:56 ` David Laight
2012-01-16 10:20 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-16 10:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-16 11:37 ` David Laight
2012-01-17 12:03 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-18 18:02 ` [PATCH 4/3] sha512: reduce stack usage even on i386 Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-26 2:35 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-27 17:51 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-01-27 22:32 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-30 11:10 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-02-03 3:34 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-14 21:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] sha512: make it work, undo percpu message schedule Eric Dumazet
2012-01-14 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-14 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-15 1:43 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-13 11:02 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-01-15 1:43 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-13 11:45 ` David Laight
2012-01-13 12:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-13 6:22 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-01-13 6:46 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-13 6:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-13 6:50 ` Herbert Xu
2012-01-13 9:45 ` David Laight
2012-01-11 1:12 ` Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120111000040.GA3801@p183.telecom.by \
--to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ken@codelabs.ch \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.