From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Venkataraman, Meenakshi" <meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
"Guy, Wey-Yi W" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iwlwifi worse than ever in current git.
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:42:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120111014257.GB22066@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4595B4D22AB93C4FABBA84AAD5AA37FD0154B1@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:05:25PM +0000, Venkataraman, Meenakshi wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> >> For the last few releases, iwlwifi has been getting consistently worse
> >> wrt reliability for me.
>
> [MV] Do you have an approximate idea of what release the failure started occurring?
>
> The failure mode has varied, from the chip
> >> just locking up with no tx/rx of packets with nothing being logged, to
> >> microcode warnings, and spewing 'Tx aggregation enabled' messages over
> >and over.
>
> [MV] I'm not sure if it is related to the problem you're seeing, but I see that you're using a 5300, so can you try to load the iwlwifi module with the following parameter and see if it helps?
>
> modprobe iwlagn bt_coex_active=0
Seems to make no difference at all.
Dave
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-11 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-10 18:49 iwlwifi worse than ever in current git Dave Jones
2012-01-10 17:54 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2012-01-10 18:53 ` Dan Williams
2012-01-10 18:53 ` Dan Williams
2012-01-10 20:40 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-10 20:40 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-11 1:42 ` Dave Jones
2012-01-11 1:42 ` Dave Jones
2012-01-11 5:31 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-11 12:38 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-11 12:38 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-11 19:28 ` Dave Jones
2012-01-11 19:50 ` Dave Jones
2012-01-11 20:38 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-19 6:47 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-01-19 6:47 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-01-19 18:04 ` Dave Jones
2012-01-19 18:29 ` Dave Jones
2012-01-19 18:29 ` Dave Jones
2012-01-19 19:12 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-19 19:12 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-19 20:38 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-19 20:38 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-19 22:04 ` Dave Jones
2012-01-19 22:04 ` Dave Jones
2012-01-20 6:50 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-20 6:50 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2012-01-10 22:05 ` Venkataraman, Meenakshi
2012-01-10 22:05 ` Venkataraman, Meenakshi
2012-01-11 1:42 ` Dave Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120111014257.GB22066@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.