From: Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
To: Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: races in ipathfs
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:20:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120119202003.GZ23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
Use of qib_super is seriously racy. qibfs_add() (and worse,
qibfs_remove()) can happen during qibfs_mount() and qibfs_kill_super().
1) CPU1: qib_init_one(). The sucker is allocated and placed
on the list. CPU2: ipathfs is mounted, directory created. CPU1: finally
gets around to qibfs_add(); by now qib_super is non-NULL and off we go,
trying to create it again. The worst part is, that code doesn't even
notice that dentry is there and positive; you silently leak the old inode.
2) CPU1: qib_init_one(). Allocated the sucker. CPU2: ipathfs
is getting mounted. Picked the first device off the list, creating
directory for it. CPU1: inserted new device into the head of the list,
continued working. Got around to qibfs_add(); qib_super is NULL, so
we do nothing. CPU2: walked the rest of the list, creating directories
for all devices. Our device is missed, since we are past that point in
the list. Worse, shift the timing a bit and it doesn't matter whether
you add to the head or to the tail of the list - if qibfs_add() happens
just before we set qib_super, we are screwed again.
3) CPU1: qib_remove_one(). CPU2: mount ipathfs is walking that
list and decides to try and create a directory for the device that is
being freed. Oops...
4) CPU1: qib_init_one() or qib_remove_one(), doesn't matter which.
CPU2: final umount of ipathfs already got through setting sb->s_root to
NULL but still hadn't set qib_super to the same. Oops... And no,
moving that qib_super = NULL; up prior to kill_litter_super() won't
fix the race either, of course.
AFAICS, the older driver (in hw/ipath) has the same problems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@qlogic.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: races in ipathfs
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:20:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120119202003.GZ23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
Use of qib_super is seriously racy. qibfs_add() (and worse,
qibfs_remove()) can happen during qibfs_mount() and qibfs_kill_super().
1) CPU1: qib_init_one(). The sucker is allocated and placed
on the list. CPU2: ipathfs is mounted, directory created. CPU1: finally
gets around to qibfs_add(); by now qib_super is non-NULL and off we go,
trying to create it again. The worst part is, that code doesn't even
notice that dentry is there and positive; you silently leak the old inode.
2) CPU1: qib_init_one(). Allocated the sucker. CPU2: ipathfs
is getting mounted. Picked the first device off the list, creating
directory for it. CPU1: inserted new device into the head of the list,
continued working. Got around to qibfs_add(); qib_super is NULL, so
we do nothing. CPU2: walked the rest of the list, creating directories
for all devices. Our device is missed, since we are past that point in
the list. Worse, shift the timing a bit and it doesn't matter whether
you add to the head or to the tail of the list - if qibfs_add() happens
just before we set qib_super, we are screwed again.
3) CPU1: qib_remove_one(). CPU2: mount ipathfs is walking that
list and decides to try and create a directory for the device that is
being freed. Oops...
4) CPU1: qib_init_one() or qib_remove_one(), doesn't matter which.
CPU2: final umount of ipathfs already got through setting sb->s_root to
NULL but still hadn't set qib_super to the same. Oops... And no,
moving that qib_super = NULL; up prior to kill_litter_super() won't
fix the race either, of course.
AFAICS, the older driver (in hw/ipath) has the same problems.
next reply other threads:[~2012-01-19 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-19 20:20 Al Viro [this message]
2012-01-19 20:20 ` races in ipathfs Al Viro
[not found] ` <20120119202003.GZ23916-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-20 13:55 ` Mike Marciniszyn
2012-01-20 13:55 ` Mike Marciniszyn
2012-03-18 18:45 ` Al Viro
2012-03-18 18:45 ` Al Viro
[not found] ` <20120318184547.GA6814-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-18 22:40 ` Al Viro
2012-03-18 22:40 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120119202003.GZ23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro-3bdd1+5odreifsdqtta3olvcufugdwfn@public.gmane.org \
--cc=infinipath-h88ZbnxC6KDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.