* Re: [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power
2011-11-18 18:47 [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power Lucas Stach
@ 2011-11-18 19:11 ` Phil Pokorny
2011-11-18 19:46 ` Lucas Stach
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Phil Pokorny @ 2011-11-18 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use the fam15h_power driver to measure my processors power
> consumption, but it gives me clearly wrong values. With a completely
> idle system the processor claims to be using 125261718µW, which would
> mean the processor operates at it's TDP limit. With all cores 100%
> loaded it claims to be using 130675781µW which I can't believe as this
> would mean the processor violates it's own spec.
You have to read the vendor documentation carefully...
TDP numbers are *not* necessarily the maximum power draw. They are
the *design* point for a thermal solution.
Further confusion is created by Intel and AMD using similar terms to
refer to different concepts.
Phil P.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power
2011-11-18 18:47 [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power Lucas Stach
2011-11-18 19:11 ` Phil Pokorny
@ 2011-11-18 19:46 ` Lucas Stach
2011-11-19 4:26 ` Phil Pokorny
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Lucas Stach @ 2011-11-18 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
SGkgUGhpbCwKCkFtIEZyZWl0YWcsIGRlbiAxOC4xMS4yMDExLCAxMToxMSAtMDgwMCBzY2hyaWVi
IFBoaWwgUG9rb3JueToKPiBPbiBGcmksIE5vdiAxOCwgMjAxMSBhdCAxMDo0NyBBTSwgTHVjYXMg
U3RhY2ggPGRldkBseW54ZXllLmRlPiB3cm90ZToKPiA+IEhpLAo+ID4KPiA+IEknbSB0cnlpbmcg
dG8gdXNlIHRoZSBmYW0xNWhfcG93ZXIgZHJpdmVyIHRvIG1lYXN1cmUgbXkgcHJvY2Vzc29ycyBw
b3dlcgo+ID4gY29uc3VtcHRpb24sIGJ1dCBpdCBnaXZlcyBtZSBjbGVhcmx5IHdyb25nIHZhbHVl
cy4gV2l0aCBhIGNvbXBsZXRlbHkKPiA+IGlkbGUgc3lzdGVtIHRoZSBwcm9jZXNzb3IgY2xhaW1z
IHRvIGJlIHVzaW5nIDEyNTI2MTcxOMK1Vywgd2hpY2ggd291bGQKPiA+IG1lYW4gdGhlIHByb2Nl
c3NvciBvcGVyYXRlcyBhdCBpdCdzIFREUCBsaW1pdC4gV2l0aCBhbGwgY29yZXMgMTAwJQo+ID4g
bG9hZGVkIGl0IGNsYWltcyB0byBiZSB1c2luZyAxMzA2NzU3ODHCtVcgd2hpY2ggSSBjYW4ndCBi
ZWxpZXZlIGFzIHRoaXMKPiA+IHdvdWxkIG1lYW4gdGhlIHByb2Nlc3NvciB2aW9sYXRlcyBpdCdz
IG93biBzcGVjLgo+IAo+IFlvdSBoYXZlIHRvIHJlYWQgdGhlIHZlbmRvciBkb2N1bWVudGF0aW9u
IGNhcmVmdWxseS4uLgo+IAo+IFREUCBudW1iZXJzIGFyZSAqbm90KiBuZWNlc3NhcmlseSB0aGUg
bWF4aW11bSBwb3dlciBkcmF3LiAgVGhleSBhcmUKPiB0aGUgKmRlc2lnbiogcG9pbnQgZm9yIGEg
dGhlcm1hbCBzb2x1dGlvbi4KCkkgYXBwcmVjaWF0ZSB5b3VyIGFuc3dlciBidXQgaGlzIGlzICpu
b3QqIHRoZSBwb2ludCBoZXJlLiBUaGUgcG9pbnQgaXMKdGhlIGZhbTE1aF9wb3dlciBkcml2ZXIg
aXMgY2xhaW1pbmcgdGhlIHByb2Nlc3NvciBpcyB1c2VpbmcgYSB0b3RhbGx5CnVuYmVsaWV2YWJs
ZSAxMjVXIHdoaWxlIGlkbGUsIHdoaWxlIHBoeXNpY2FsIG1lYXN1cmVtZW50cyBoYXZlIHNob3du
CnRoYXQgZmFtMTVoIHByb2Nlc3NvcnMgZG8gbm90IHVzZSBtb3JlIHRoYW4gYSBmZXcgKGJlbG93
IDEwKSBXYXR0cyBpbgp0aGlzIHN0YXRlLgoKQWxzbyB0aGUgcHJvY2Vzc29yIGl0c2VsZiBjbGFp
bXMgdG8gaGF2ZSBhbiB1cHBlciBURFAgbGltaXQgb2YgMTI0Ljc3VwooYXMgc2hvd24gYnkgZmFt
MTVoX3Bvd2VyKSwgc28gbm8gbWVhc3VyZW1lbnQgc2hvdWxkIGV2ZXIgZXhjZWVkIHRoaXMuCj4g
Cj4gRnVydGhlciBjb25mdXNpb24gaXMgY3JlYXRlZCBieSBJbnRlbCBhbmQgQU1EIHVzaW5nIHNp
bWlsYXIgdGVybXMgdG8KPiByZWZlciB0byBkaWZmZXJlbnQgY29uY2VwdHMuCj4gCj4gUGhpbCBQ
Lgo+IAoKCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwps
bS1zZW5zb3JzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApsbS1zZW5zb3JzQGxtLXNlbnNvcnMub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9s
aXN0cy5sbS1zZW5zb3JzLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2xtLXNlbnNvcnM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power
2011-11-18 18:47 [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power Lucas Stach
2011-11-18 19:11 ` Phil Pokorny
2011-11-18 19:46 ` Lucas Stach
@ 2011-11-19 4:26 ` Phil Pokorny
2011-11-19 8:50 ` Jean Delvare
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Phil Pokorny @ 2011-11-19 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 11:11 -0800 schrieb Phil Pokorny:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to use the fam15h_power driver to measure my processors power
>> > consumption, but it gives me clearly wrong values. With a completely
>> > idle system the processor claims to be using 125261718µW, which would
>> > mean the processor operates at it's TDP limit. With all cores 100%
>> > loaded it claims to be using 130675781µW which I can't believe as this
>> > would mean the processor violates it's own spec.
>>
>> You have to read the vendor documentation carefully...
>>
>> TDP numbers are *not* necessarily the maximum power draw. They are
>> the *design* point for a thermal solution.
>
> I appreciate your answer but his is *not* the point here. The point is
> the fam15h_power driver is claiming the processor is useing a totally
> unbelievable 125W while idle, while physical measurements have shown
> that fam15h processors do not use more than a few (below 10) Watts in
> this state.
Do you have the ability to measure the power on the 12V power
connector to the CPU VRM? Will you be able to compare the fam15_power
reported value to a physical measurement from the same system at the
same time?
Do you have All Core Boost enabled in the BIOS?
Is PowerNow enabled in the BIOS?
Is the "cpuspeed" daemon running?
If you've already verified all those things, my apologies, but I find
that it helps to ask basic questions to make sure that the simple
things have been addressed and that everyone is testing the same
configuration.
In my experience with Interlagos CPU's, idle power (with those power
saving features enabled) somewhat higher than previous Magny Cours
CPU's.
Regardless, I tested the fam15_power driver on some Interlagos CPU's
and I agree there is something wrong about the math.
The power1_crit value reported is 114.8W.
At idle, the raw register value is at just shy of it's maximum
"positive" value of "0x1ffffe" with a "range" of "0xe". The reported
power1_input is 89.9W
When I start power sucking jobs on the cores, the raw values don't
change at all until I start to load both integer cores on a single
bulldozer module. Then the raw values start to decrease to less than
0x4000. I never saw the "range" change from "0xe". Once in a while,
the raw value is a negative value. (0x3ffxxx). I know that power draw
is increasing, because I see the temperatures rising (via k10temp
hacked to read fam15h temps).
But with that change from "maximum" to "minimum" the reported
power1_input values change very little. Only rising as high as 97W
and it falls *back* to 96.5W after I load up all the integer cores.
> Also the processor itself claims to have an upper TDP limit of 124.77W
> (as shown by fam15h_power), so no measurement should ever exceed this.
I did see negative values reported by the raw register and according
to the math in the driver they would result in reported values higher
than TDP. And I have been told that processors _can_ draw more than
TDP for "short" periods of time.
But this driver is clearly not reporting something that could be
considered "instantaneous power draw" It might be better to change
the driver to report the TDP and come up with some other name for the
"running avg" number directly because it appears to be a "head room"
or margin and *not* an instant power measurement. But it can also
have big swings in value without corresponding changes in the power
draw, so I'm not sure what we should call it.
Phil P.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power
2011-11-18 18:47 [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power Lucas Stach
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-11-19 4:26 ` Phil Pokorny
@ 2011-11-19 8:50 ` Jean Delvare
2011-11-19 19:58 ` Phil Pokorny
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2011-11-19 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Phil,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:26:25 -0800, Phil Pokorny wrote:
> I know that power draw
> is increasing, because I see the temperatures rising (via k10temp
> hacked to read fam15h temps).
Which hack? The k10temp driver is supposed to already support fam15h
CPUs (both in kernel 3.0+ and the standalone driver.)
> (...)
> But this driver is clearly not reporting something that could be
> considered "instantaneous power draw" It might be better to change
> the driver to report the TDP and come up with some other name for the
> "running avg" number directly because it appears to be a "head room"
> or margin and *not* an instant power measurement. But it can also
> have big swings in value without corresponding changes in the power
> draw, so I'm not sure what we should call it.
In a sense this is continuing the long tradition of "monitoring AMD
CPUs is impossible because they return completely weird values half of
the time". We had this for K8 and fam10h temperatures already... That's
very sad.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power
2011-11-18 18:47 [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power Lucas Stach
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-11-19 8:50 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2011-11-19 19:58 ` Phil Pokorny
2011-11-22 8:41 ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-01-20 17:18 ` Andreas Herrmann
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Phil Pokorny @ 2011-11-19 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:26:25 -0800, Phil Pokorny wrote:
>> I know that power draw
>> is increasing, because I see the temperatures rising (via k10temp
>> hacked to read fam15h temps).
>
> Which hack? The k10temp driver is supposed to already support fam15h
> CPUs (both in kernel 3.0+ and the standalone driver.)
Sure, but I'm running an older kernel, so I had to backport those updates.
Phil P.
Phil P.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power
2011-11-18 18:47 [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power Lucas Stach
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-11-19 19:58 ` Phil Pokorny
@ 2011-11-22 8:41 ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-01-20 17:18 ` Andreas Herrmann
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Herrmann @ 2011-11-22 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors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^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power
2011-11-18 18:47 [lm-sensors] wrong output with fam15h_power Lucas Stach
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-11-22 8:41 ` Andreas Herrmann
@ 2012-01-20 17:18 ` Andreas Herrmann
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Herrmann @ 2012-01-20 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors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^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread