From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:47:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120120184716.GB23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK1hOcNget=-MjeejiYGo5Vkigq9ey1o7sD2peO+tDGdk3TU9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:20:33PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:
> > ?BTW, systemd allows to define addition mountpoints in
> > ?systemd.mount(5) unit file(s), so we already have additional place
> > ?for fstab stuff...
>
> systemd needs a large blunt object be stuck into its eye.
>
> systemd was supposed to be an init replacement.
> Its continuing attempts to infiltrate entire system
> are very worrying.
I'm not saying I like /etc/foo.d/* (hell, sed in post-install is not
a big deal; not for fstab, not for inetd.conf, etc.), but yes,
complaints about changes that make life somewhat more difficult for
systemd are rather hypocritical, what with the embrace-and-extend
games they are playing.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
util-linux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:47:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120120184716.GB23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK1hOcNget=-MjeejiYGo5Vkigq9ey1o7sD2peO+tDGdk3TU9g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:20:33PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Karel Zak <kzak-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > ?BTW, systemd allows to define addition mountpoints in
> > ?systemd.mount(5) unit file(s), so we already have additional place
> > ?for fstab stuff...
>
> systemd needs a large blunt object be stuck into its eye.
>
> systemd was supposed to be an init replacement.
> Its continuing attempts to infiltrate entire system
> are very worrying.
I'm not saying I like /etc/foo.d/* (hell, sed in post-install is not
a big deal; not for fstab, not for inetd.conf, etc.), but yes,
complaints about changes that make life somewhat more difficult for
systemd are rather hypocritical, what with the embrace-and-extend
games they are playing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 14:04 /etc/fstab.d yes or not Karel Zak
2012-01-20 14:04 ` Karel Zak
2012-01-20 14:20 ` Masatake YAMATO
2012-01-20 14:56 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 14:56 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 15:57 ` Roger Leigh
2012-01-20 16:08 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 16:08 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-24 0:19 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-01-24 0:19 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-01-24 9:47 ` bastien ROUCARIES
2012-01-24 9:47 ` bastien ROUCARIES
2012-01-20 14:43 ` Attila Kinali
2012-01-20 14:59 ` Karel Zak
2012-01-20 14:59 ` Karel Zak
2012-01-20 15:03 ` Voelker, Bernhard
2012-01-20 15:20 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 15:20 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 15:49 ` Roger Leigh
2012-01-20 15:49 ` Roger Leigh
2012-01-20 16:13 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 16:22 ` Roger Leigh
2012-01-20 16:22 ` Roger Leigh
2012-01-20 17:59 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 17:59 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-23 12:21 ` Karel Zak
2012-01-23 13:01 ` Masatake YAMATO
2012-01-23 13:03 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-23 13:26 ` Masatake YAMATO
2012-01-23 13:37 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-23 14:14 ` Masatake YAMATO
2012-01-23 14:32 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-23 13:55 ` Theodore Tso
2012-01-23 22:07 ` Alan Cox
2012-01-24 1:06 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-01-20 18:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-20 18:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-20 18:29 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 18:29 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 18:47 ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-01-20 18:47 ` Al Viro
2012-01-24 11:02 ` /etc/fstab.d yes or not (resolved) Karel Zak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120120184716.GB23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.