All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler Hicks <tyler.hicks@canonical.com>
To: tim.gardner@canonical.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ecryptfs: Improve metatdata read failure logging
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:50:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120120195041.GC9156@boyd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F0F0E10.1010107@canonical.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6757 bytes --]

On 2012-01-12 17:45:04, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 01:00 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> >On 2012-01-11 18:00:41, Tim Gardner wrote:
> >>There are 3 read failure cases in ecryptfs_read_metadata(), but only 2
> >>of them are uniquely noted by kernel log messages. This patch
> >>identifies and logs each read failure case. It also correctly interprets
> >>a negative return value from ecryptfs_read_lower().
> >
> >I'm not sure that the negative return value was incorrectly interpreted.
> >See below.
> >
> >>
> >>Removes unnecessary variable initialization.
> >>
> >>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >>Cc: Tyler Hicks<tyler.hicks@canonical.com>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner<tim.gardner@canonical.com>
> >>---
> >>  fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c |   17 +++++++++++------
> >>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c b/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> >>index d3c8776..ac063bd 100644
> >>--- a/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> >>+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> >>@@ -1590,8 +1590,8 @@ int ecryptfs_read_and_validate_xattr_region(struct dentry *dentry,
> >>   */
> >>  int ecryptfs_read_metadata(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry)
> >>  {
> >>-	int rc = 0;
> >>-	char *page_virt = NULL;
> >>+	int rc;
> >>+	char *page_virt;
> >>  	struct inode *ecryptfs_inode = ecryptfs_dentry->d_inode;
> >>  	struct ecryptfs_crypt_stat *crypt_stat =
> >>  	&ecryptfs_inode_to_private(ecryptfs_inode)->crypt_stat;
> >>@@ -1611,10 +1611,15 @@ int ecryptfs_read_metadata(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry)
> >>  	}
> >>  	rc = ecryptfs_read_lower(page_virt, 0, crypt_stat->extent_size,
> >>  				 ecryptfs_inode);
> >>-	if (rc>= 0)
> >>-		rc = ecryptfs_read_headers_virt(page_virt, crypt_stat,
> >>-						ecryptfs_dentry,
> >>-						ECRYPTFS_VALIDATE_HEADER_SIZE);
> >>+	if (rc<  0) {
> >>+		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Could not read %u bytes\n",
> >>+			__func__, crypt_stat->extent_size);
> >>+		goto out;
> >>+	}
> >
> >This may break things a bit for users that use the
> >ecryptfs_xattr_metadata mount option (which stores the metadata in an
> >xattr, rather than the header of the file). A failure to read the lower
> >file here doesn't matter because the metadata is likely stored in an
> >xattr, which will be found with the ecryptfs_read_xattr_region() call
> >below.
> >
> >I've never liked that ecryptfs potentially looks in both the header and
> >the xattr for metadata, but that's how it has been since the very early
> >days of eCryptfs. I've wanted to change this but there is the potential
> >to break things for users who have a mixture of files with metadata in
> >the header and in the header.
> >
> >Maybe we just go whole hog for 3.3 and only look in either the header or
> >xattr for metadata, depending on whether or not ecryptfs_xattr_metadata
> >is used?
> >
> >I could live with that, but I would definitely not want something like
> >that to go to the stable kernel. Any thoughts?
> >
> >Tyler
> >
> 
> I think you're right. Given the way the metadata checks are coded I
> think its impossible to disambiguate the 2 failure scenarios.
> However, its not really relevant that we know which one failed, only
> the inode of the metadata read that _did_ fail is important.
> 
> How about this much simpler patch that is also suitable for stable ?
> Tested on 3.2.

Hey Tim - Sorry for the hiccup in response time. Comments below.

> 
> rtg
> -- 
> Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com

> From 48f75c409ddc00caec88162f53c3155196b17854 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:31:55 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1 V2] ecryptfs: Improve metadata read failure logging
> 
> Print inode on metadata read failure. The only real
> way of dealing with metadata read failures is to delete
> the underlying file system file. Having the inode
> allows one to 'find . -inum INODE`.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyler.hicks@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
> ---
>  fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c |   14 +++++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c b/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> index d3c8776..326d6ab 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> @@ -1590,8 +1590,8 @@ int ecryptfs_read_and_validate_xattr_region(struct dentry *dentry,
>   */
>  int ecryptfs_read_metadata(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry)
>  {
> -	int rc = 0;
> -	char *page_virt = NULL;
> +	int rc;
> +	char *page_virt;

I doubt there is any issue with not initializing these variables in
the older, stable kernel releases, but I don't want to take the time to
verify that.

So, would you mind if I split this variable initialization part into a
separate patch not for stable? I can handle that on my end, if that's
alright with you. 

The printk's below are safe and stable-worthy, IMO, because end-users
should really benefit from the changes.

Tyler

>  	struct inode *ecryptfs_inode = ecryptfs_dentry->d_inode;
>  	struct ecryptfs_crypt_stat *crypt_stat =
>  	    &ecryptfs_inode_to_private(ecryptfs_inode)->crypt_stat;
> @@ -1616,11 +1616,13 @@ int ecryptfs_read_metadata(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry)
>  						ecryptfs_dentry,
>  						ECRYPTFS_VALIDATE_HEADER_SIZE);
>  	if (rc) {
> +		/* metadata is not in the file header, so try xattrs */
>  		memset(page_virt, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
>  		rc = ecryptfs_read_xattr_region(page_virt, ecryptfs_inode);
>  		if (rc) {
>  			printk(KERN_DEBUG "Valid eCryptfs headers not found in "
> -			       "file header region or xattr region\n");
> +			       "file header region or xattr region, inode %lu\n",
> +				ecryptfs_inode->i_ino);
>  			rc = -EINVAL;
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> @@ -1629,7 +1631,8 @@ int ecryptfs_read_metadata(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry)
>  						ECRYPTFS_DONT_VALIDATE_HEADER_SIZE);
>  		if (rc) {
>  			printk(KERN_DEBUG "Valid eCryptfs headers not found in "
> -			       "file xattr region either\n");
> +			       "file xattr region either, inode %lu\n",
> +				ecryptfs_inode->i_ino);
>  			rc = -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  		if (crypt_stat->mount_crypt_stat->flags
> @@ -1640,7 +1643,8 @@ int ecryptfs_read_metadata(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry)
>  			       "crypto metadata only in the extended attribute "
>  			       "region, but eCryptfs was mounted without "
>  			       "xattr support enabled. eCryptfs will not treat "
> -			       "this like an encrypted file.\n");
> +			       "this like an encrypted file, inode %lu\n",
> +				ecryptfs_inode->i_ino);
>  			rc = -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.7.8.3
> 


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-20 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-11 17:00 [PATCH 0/2] ecryptfs: Improved metadata read failure logging Tim Gardner
2012-01-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] ecryptfs: Improve metatdata " Tim Gardner
2012-01-11 20:36   ` Kees Cook
2012-01-12 12:00   ` Tyler Hicks
2012-01-12 16:45     ` Tim Gardner
2012-01-12 16:45       ` Tim Gardner
2012-01-20 19:50       ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
2012-01-20 20:17         ` Tim Gardner
2012-01-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ecryptfs: Print inode on metadata error Tim Gardner
2012-01-11 20:38   ` Kees Cook
2012-01-12 12:02   ` Tyler Hicks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120120195041.GC9156@boyd \
    --to=tyler.hicks@canonical.com \
    --cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.