From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad-Ix1uc/W3ht7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
David Brown <davidb-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] iommu/amd: Implement DOMAIN_ATTR_GEOMETRY attribute
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:26:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120127102608.GK19255@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbbZB0hGRr84JV4a7c0KvW7VbVzsnCx1PGg=wjoB0OSrYw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Hi Ohad,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:08:44AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Implement the attribute itself and add the code for the
> > AMD IOMMU driver.
>
> It's somewhat non-intuitive to have the generic attribute code bundled
> with the AMD implementation in the same patch (took me some time to
> find it here :).
>
> Maybe split this to two patches ?
Yes, that is not ideal. I'll probably split it or move the generic part
to the first patch.
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > index ef54718..3d0b0bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > @@ -345,10 +345,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_device_group);
> > int iommu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > enum iommu_attr attr, void *data)
> > {
> > - if (!domain->ops->domain_get_attr)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + struct iommu_domain_geometry *geometry;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + switch (attr) {
> > + case DOMAIN_ATTR_GEOMETRY:
> > + geometry = data;
> > + *geometry = domain->geometry;
>
> This is not type-safe and will surely bite someone some day.
>
> Sure, we can't have type safety in a multi-purpose generic interface,
> but I wonder whether this is the right interface for getting the
> geometry ? I.e. why not have a dedicated API for this ?
I fell also uncomfortable with the missing type-safety of this
interface. But the alternative is to have dedicated functions for
set/get each attribute. Well, it depends on how many attributes we have
in the end, but given that the PAMU guys already have need for a number
of hardware specific attributes it is likely that having individual
functions makes the api too complex in the end.
But probably we can replace the 'void *data' with a 'union
domain_attr'? This will give us some type-safety.
Joerg
--
AMD Operating System Research Center
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Stuart Yoder <b08248@gmail.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] iommu/amd: Implement DOMAIN_ATTR_GEOMETRY attribute
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:26:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120127102608.GK19255@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbbZB0hGRr84JV4a7c0KvW7VbVzsnCx1PGg=wjoB0OSrYw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ohad,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:08:44AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> > Implement the attribute itself and add the code for the
> > AMD IOMMU driver.
>
> It's somewhat non-intuitive to have the generic attribute code bundled
> with the AMD implementation in the same patch (took me some time to
> find it here :).
>
> Maybe split this to two patches ?
Yes, that is not ideal. I'll probably split it or move the generic part
to the first patch.
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > index ef54718..3d0b0bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > @@ -345,10 +345,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_device_group);
> > int iommu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > enum iommu_attr attr, void *data)
> > {
> > - if (!domain->ops->domain_get_attr)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + struct iommu_domain_geometry *geometry;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + switch (attr) {
> > + case DOMAIN_ATTR_GEOMETRY:
> > + geometry = data;
> > + *geometry = domain->geometry;
>
> This is not type-safe and will surely bite someone some day.
>
> Sure, we can't have type safety in a multi-purpose generic interface,
> but I wonder whether this is the right interface for getting the
> geometry ? I.e. why not have a dedicated API for this ?
I fell also uncomfortable with the missing type-safety of this
interface. But the alternative is to have dedicated functions for
set/get each attribute. Well, it depends on how many attributes we have
in the end, but given that the PAMU guys already have need for a number
of hardware specific attributes it is likely that having individual
functions makes the api too complex in the end.
But probably we can replace the 'void *data' with a 'union
domain_attr'? This will give us some type-safety.
Joerg
--
AMD Operating System Research Center
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-27 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-26 18:40 [PATCH 0/6 v2] IOMMU: Make IOMMU-API ready for GART-like hardware Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <1327603257-17028-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-26 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] iommu: Add domain-attribute handlers Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] iommu/amd: Implement DOMAIN_ATTR_GEOMETRY attribute Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <1327603257-17028-3-git-send-email-joerg.roedel-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-27 7:08 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-01-27 7:08 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
[not found] ` <CAK=WgbbZB0hGRr84JV4a7c0KvW7VbVzsnCx1PGg=wjoB0OSrYw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-27 10:26 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2012-01-27 10:26 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20120127102608.GK19255-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-27 11:00 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-01-27 11:00 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
[not found] ` <CAK=WgbZQB+76FuJXK82x09CieDmF23zLQ8KbHbEtjnQsc_4axg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-27 13:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-01-27 13:03 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20120127130329.GM19255-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-28 20:44 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-01-28 20:44 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
[not found] ` <CAK=WgbY+aBwTno4YxGLaxS7Y-R=CS1604+c5j-6EMQSfJeGvTA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-30 14:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-01-30 14:49 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20120130144909.GT19255-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-30 15:42 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-01-30 15:42 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-01-26 18:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] iommu/vt-d: " Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] iommu/omap: " Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] iommu/msm: " Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <1327603257-17028-6-git-send-email-joerg.roedel-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-27 0:07 ` David Brown
2012-01-27 0:07 ` David Brown
2012-01-26 18:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] iommu/tegra: " Joerg Roedel
2012-01-26 18:40 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120127102608.GK19255@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel-5c7gfcevmho@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davidb-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ohad-Ix1uc/W3ht7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.