All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch] x86, dumpstack: removed unneeded check in dump_trace()
@ 2012-01-28 10:52 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2012-01-28 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Frederic Weisbecker,
	Namhyung Kim, Peter Zijlstra, Clemens Ladisch, linux-kernel,
	kernel-janitors

Smatch complains that we have some inconsistent NULL checking.  If
"task" were NULL then it would lead to a NULL dereference later.  We
can remove this test because earlier on in the function we have:
	if (!task)
		task = current;

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 6d728d9..af7785f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	if (!stack) {
 		if (regs)
 			stack = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
-		else if (task && task != current)
+		else if (task != current)
 			stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
 		else
 			stack = &dummy;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [patch] x86, dumpstack: removed unneeded check in dump_trace()
@ 2012-01-28 10:52 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2012-01-28 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Frederic Weisbecker,
	Namhyung Kim, Peter Zijlstra, Clemens Ladisch, linux-kernel,
	kernel-janitors

Smatch complains that we have some inconsistent NULL checking.  If
"task" were NULL then it would lead to a NULL dereference later.  We
can remove this test because earlier on in the function we have:
	if (!task)
		task = current;

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 6d728d9..af7785f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	if (!stack) {
 		if (regs)
 			stack = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
-		else if (task && task != current)
+		else if (task != current)
 			stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
 		else
 			stack = &dummy;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] x86, dumpstack: removed unneeded check in dump_trace()
  2012-01-28 10:52 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2012-01-28 11:00   ` Frederic Weisbecker
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2012-01-28 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Namhyung Kim,
	Peter Zijlstra, Clemens Ladisch, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:52:46PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that we have some inconsistent NULL checking.  If
> "task" were NULL then it would lead to a NULL dereference later.  We
> can remove this test because earlier on in the function we have:
> 	if (!task)
> 		task = current;
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>

> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> index 6d728d9..af7785f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	if (!stack) {
>  		if (regs)
>  			stack = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
> -		else if (task && task != current)
> +		else if (task != current)
>  			stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
>  		else
>  			stack = &dummy;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] x86, dumpstack: removed unneeded check in dump_trace()
@ 2012-01-28 11:00   ` Frederic Weisbecker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2012-01-28 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Namhyung Kim,
	Peter Zijlstra, Clemens Ladisch, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:52:46PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that we have some inconsistent NULL checking.  If
> "task" were NULL then it would lead to a NULL dereference later.  We
> can remove this test because earlier on in the function we have:
> 	if (!task)
> 		task = current;
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>

> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> index 6d728d9..af7785f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	if (!stack) {
>  		if (regs)
>  			stack = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
> -		else if (task && task != current)
> +		else if (task != current)
>  			stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
>  		else
>  			stack = &dummy;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [tip:perf/urgent] x86/dumpstack: Remove unneeded check in dump_trace()
  2012-01-28 10:52 ` Dan Carpenter
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2012-01-30 13:20 ` tip-bot for Dan Carpenter
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dan Carpenter @ 2012-01-30 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, a.p.zijlstra, namhyung, fweisbec, tglx,
	mingo, dan.carpenter, clemens

Commit-ID:  d0caf292505d051b1026e85faf3a85e907566f31
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/d0caf292505d051b1026e85faf3a85e907566f31
Author:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:52:46 +0300
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:09:06 +0100

x86/dumpstack: Remove unneeded check in dump_trace()

Smatch complains that we have some inconsistent NULL checking.

If "task" were NULL then it would lead to a NULL dereference
later. We can remove this test because earlier on in the
function we have:

 if (!task)
	task = current;

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120128105246.GA25092@elgon.mountain
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 6d728d9..af7785f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	if (!stack) {
 		if (regs)
 			stack = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
-		else if (task && task != current)
+		else if (task != current)
 			stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
 		else
 			stack = &dummy;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-30 13:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-28 10:52 [patch] x86, dumpstack: removed unneeded check in dump_trace() Dan Carpenter
2012-01-28 10:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-01-28 11:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-01-28 11:00   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-01-30 13:20 ` [tip:perf/urgent] x86/dumpstack: Remove " tip-bot for Dan Carpenter

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.