From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Pinmux bindings proposal V2
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:43:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130174323.GF9339@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130021041.GB10470@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
* Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> [120129 17:27]:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> ...
> > I guess the analog we should follow here is clk_get and clk_set_rate,
> > except we would have pinconf_set_state with predefined states.
> >
> It seems working for cases that we only change pinconf but never pinmux
> for different configuration states. But how would that work for cases
> that require mux change for different configuration states?
I don't see why we should not allow changing the mux state with pinconf
too, after all it's the mux/pin that's locked, not the functionality of
the pin.
An example of this would be remuxing a shared UART line between rx and
tx. Those kind of cases could be defined as PMX_DIRECTION_INPUT and
PMX_DIRECTION_OUTPUT so driver could call Linux generic functions for
those if implemented.
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Dong Aisheng <dongas86-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org"
<rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org"
<kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
"cjb-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<cjb-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"Sascha Hauer (s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org)"
<s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Pinmux bindings proposal V2
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:43:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130174323.GF9339@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130021041.GB10470-rvtDTF3kK1ictlrPMvKcciBecyulp+rMXqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org>
* Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> [120129 17:27]:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> ...
> > I guess the analog we should follow here is clk_get and clk_set_rate,
> > except we would have pinconf_set_state with predefined states.
> >
> It seems working for cases that we only change pinconf but never pinmux
> for different configuration states. But how would that work for cases
> that require mux change for different configuration states?
I don't see why we should not allow changing the mux state with pinconf
too, after all it's the mux/pin that's locked, not the functionality of
the pin.
An example of this would be remuxing a shared UART line between rx and
tx. Those kind of cases could be defined as PMX_DIRECTION_INPUT and
PMX_DIRECTION_OUTPUT so driver could call Linux generic functions for
those if implemented.
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
Dong Aisheng-B29396 <B29396@freescale.com>,
"Linus Walleij (linus.walleij@linaro.org)"
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Sascha Hauer (s.hauer@pengutronix.de)" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"cjb@laptop.org" <cjb@laptop.org>,
"Simon Glass (sjg@chromium.org)" <sjg@chromium.org>,
Dong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
"Grant Likely (grant.likely@secretlab.ca)"
<grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Pinmux bindings proposal V2
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:43:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130174323.GF9339@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130021041.GB10470@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
* Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> [120129 17:27]:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> ...
> > I guess the analog we should follow here is clk_get and clk_set_rate,
> > except we would have pinconf_set_state with predefined states.
> >
> It seems working for cases that we only change pinconf but never pinmux
> for different configuration states. But how would that work for cases
> that require mux change for different configuration states?
I don't see why we should not allow changing the mux state with pinconf
too, after all it's the mux/pin that's locked, not the functionality of
the pin.
An example of this would be remuxing a shared UART line between rx and
tx. Those kind of cases could be defined as PMX_DIRECTION_INPUT and
PMX_DIRECTION_OUTPUT so driver could call Linux generic functions for
those if implemented.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 146+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 22:22 Pinmux bindings proposal V2 Stephen Warren
2012-01-20 22:22 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-23 21:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-23 21:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-23 21:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-23 23:08 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-23 23:08 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-23 23:08 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-24 1:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-24 1:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-24 1:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-24 22:29 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-24 22:29 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-24 22:29 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-25 0:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-25 0:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-26 19:33 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-26 19:33 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-26 19:33 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 2:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 2:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 6:57 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-27 6:57 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-27 6:57 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-27 17:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-30 1:56 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 1:56 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 1:56 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 17:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-30 17:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-30 17:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-31 1:32 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-31 1:32 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-31 2:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-31 2:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-31 2:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-31 14:35 ` Reg pinmux driver for OMAP based SoC- AM335X Mohammed, Afzal
2012-01-31 17:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-31 17:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-01 10:04 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-02-01 10:04 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-02-01 18:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-01 18:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-03 20:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-03 20:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-01 11:00 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2012-02-01 11:00 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2012-02-01 5:36 ` Pinmux bindings proposal V2 Shawn Guo
2012-02-01 5:36 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-01 5:36 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-27 17:36 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:36 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:36 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-26 9:36 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-26 9:36 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-26 9:36 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-26 17:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-26 17:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-26 17:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 7:19 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-27 7:19 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-27 7:19 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-27 17:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-30 2:10 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 2:10 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 2:10 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 17:43 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-01-30 17:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-30 17:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-31 1:07 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-31 1:07 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-31 1:07 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-26 9:24 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-26 9:24 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-26 17:42 ` Simon Glass
2012-01-26 17:42 ` Simon Glass
2012-01-27 2:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 2:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 2:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 15:43 ` Simon Glass
2012-01-27 15:43 ` Simon Glass
2012-01-27 17:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:51 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:51 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:51 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 18:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 18:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 18:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-30 3:27 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 3:27 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 3:27 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 3:13 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 3:13 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 17:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-30 17:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-30 17:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 17:38 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:38 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:38 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:29 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:29 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-27 17:29 ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-30 2:31 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 2:31 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-30 2:31 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-01 14:35 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-01 14:35 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-02 18:36 ` Stephen Warren
2012-02-02 18:36 ` Stephen Warren
2012-02-02 18:36 ` Stephen Warren
2012-02-02 20:07 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-02 20:07 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-02 20:07 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-03 14:02 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-03 14:02 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-03 14:02 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-03 17:21 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-03 17:21 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-03 17:21 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-03 17:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-03 17:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-03 17:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-03 18:13 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-03 18:13 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-03 18:13 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-03 21:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-03 21:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-04 16:55 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-04 16:55 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-02-04 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-04 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-04 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-03 8:46 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-03 8:46 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-13 19:58 ` Stephen Warren
2012-02-13 19:58 ` Stephen Warren
2012-02-13 19:58 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120130174323.GF9339@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.