From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] ARM mach/irqs.h cleanup for 3.4
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:42:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120201054221.GA3531@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F284532.90303@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:46:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Can you please pull mach/irqs.h clean-up for 3.4. I've gotten little to
> no response from the affected platform maintainers. It's primarily
> superh and shmobile that have any significant changes though.
>
Sorry about that, it's been in my backlog. The changes as they are are
fine with me, I've got some pending work that switches to dynamic use off
of nr_irqs that will make most of it redundant that I had hoped to have
done in time, but it can be done incrementally at a later point in time,
too.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
jamie@jamieiles.com, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] ARM mach/irqs.h cleanup for 3.4
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:42:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120201054221.GA3531@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F284532.90303@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:46:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Can you please pull mach/irqs.h clean-up for 3.4. I've gotten little to
> no response from the affected platform maintainers. It's primarily
> superh and shmobile that have any significant changes though.
>
Sorry about that, it's been in my backlog. The changes as they are are
fine with me, I've got some pending work that switches to dynamic use off
of nr_irqs that will make most of it redundant that I had hoped to have
done in time, but it can be done incrementally at a later point in time,
too.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lethal@linux-sh.org (Paul Mundt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PULL] ARM mach/irqs.h cleanup for 3.4
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:42:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120201054221.GA3531@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F284532.90303@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:46:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Can you please pull mach/irqs.h clean-up for 3.4. I've gotten little to
> no response from the affected platform maintainers. It's primarily
> superh and shmobile that have any significant changes though.
>
Sorry about that, it's been in my backlog. The changes as they are are
fine with me, I've got some pending work that switches to dynamic use off
of nr_irqs that will make most of it redundant that I had hoped to have
done in time, but it can be done incrementally at a later point in time,
too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-31 19:46 [PULL] ARM mach/irqs.h cleanup for 3.4 Rob Herring
2012-01-31 19:46 ` Rob Herring
2012-01-31 19:46 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-01 5:42 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2012-02-01 5:42 ` Paul Mundt
2012-02-01 5:42 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120201054221.GA3531@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.