From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
dedekind1@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] mtd : Make the mtd_suspend return 0 if the suspend is not implemented
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:21:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120202202113.GA17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201202021940.26552.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:40:26PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, February 02, 2012, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 23:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Thanks, but is anyone actually going to push it to Linus any time soon?
> >
> > I agree, but I am not the maintainer so cannot answer. David Woodhouse
> > is aware of this, but I do not know when he gonna send the pull request.
>
> Well, the problem is being reported by more and more people, so I'd
> like to push the fix quickly.
>
> David, please let me know if you don't want me to include the $subject patch
> into the next PM fixes pull request. If I don't hear from you, I'll push it
> next week for -rc4.
I too have it in my tree as a patch which Artem sent me, as it's rather
fundamental to not oopsing the kernel when you suspend/resume on any ARM
platform.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] mtd : Make the mtd_suspend return 0 if the suspend is not implemented
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:21:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120202202113.GA17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201202021940.26552.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:40:26PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, February 02, 2012, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 23:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Thanks, but is anyone actually going to push it to Linus any time soon?
> >
> > I agree, but I am not the maintainer so cannot answer. David Woodhouse
> > is aware of this, but I do not know when he gonna send the pull request.
>
> Well, the problem is being reported by more and more people, so I'd
> like to push the fix quickly.
>
> David, please let me know if you don't want me to include the $subject patch
> into the next PM fixes pull request. If I don't hear from you, I'll push it
> next week for -rc4.
I too have it in my tree as a patch which Artem sent me, as it's rather
fundamental to not oopsing the kernel when you suspend/resume on any ARM
platform.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/2] mtd : Make the mtd_suspend return 0 if the suspend is not implemented
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:21:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120202202113.GA17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201202021940.26552.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:40:26PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, February 02, 2012, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 23:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Thanks, but is anyone actually going to push it to Linus any time soon?
> >
> > I agree, but I am not the maintainer so cannot answer. David Woodhouse
> > is aware of this, but I do not know when he gonna send the pull request.
>
> Well, the problem is being reported by more and more people, so I'd
> like to push the fix quickly.
>
> David, please let me know if you don't want me to include the $subject patch
> into the next PM fixes pull request. If I don't hear from you, I'll push it
> next week for -rc4.
I too have it in my tree as a patch which Artem sent me, as it's rather
fundamental to not oopsing the kernel when you suspend/resume on any ARM
platform.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-02 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 8:12 [PATCH RFC 0/2] mtd updates Shubhrajyoti D
2012-01-23 8:12 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-01-23 8:12 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-01-23 8:12 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] mtd : Prevent the NULL pointer access Shubhrajyoti D
2012-01-23 8:12 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-01-23 8:12 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-01-27 19:08 ` Brian Norris
2012-01-27 19:08 ` Brian Norris
2012-01-27 19:08 ` Brian Norris
2012-01-23 8:12 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] mtd : Make the mtd_suspend return 0 if the suspend is not implemented Shubhrajyoti D
2012-01-23 8:12 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-01-23 8:12 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-01-24 8:09 ` Brian Norris
2012-01-24 8:09 ` Brian Norris
2012-01-24 8:09 ` Brian Norris
2012-01-24 8:52 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-01-24 8:52 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-01-24 9:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-24 9:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-24 9:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-25 5:16 ` Brian Norris
2012-01-25 5:16 ` Brian Norris
2012-01-25 5:16 ` Brian Norris
2012-01-30 11:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-01-30 11:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-01-30 11:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-01-30 22:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-01-30 22:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-01-30 22:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-02 11:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-02 11:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-02 11:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-02 18:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-02 18:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-02 18:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-02 20:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-02-02 20:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-02 20:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-02 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-02 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-02 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120202202113.GA17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.