From: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
imunsie@au1.ibm.com, eranian@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Numeric assembly labels cause incorrect annotation
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:25:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207142521.GA5840@mgebm.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207145535.71b9f22d@kryten>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2133 bytes --]
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> A perf annotate of a kernel function written in assembly shows
> very strange percentages:
>
> : _GLOBAL(__copy_tofrom_user_base)
>
> ...
>
> : addi r3,r3,1
> 99.67 : c00000000004d78c: addi r3,r3,1
> :
> 0.00 : 1: bf cr7*4+2,2f
> 0.07 : c00000000004d790: bne- cr7,c00000000004d7a4
> : err1; lhz r0,0(r4)
> 0.00 : c00000000004d794: lhz r0,0(r4)
> : addi r4,r4,2
> 0.00 : c00000000004d798: addi r4,r4,2
> : err1; sth r0,0(r3)
> 0.00 : c00000000004d79c: sth r0,0(r3)
> : addi r3,r3,2
> 99.60 : c00000000004d7a0: addi r3,r3,2
> :
> 0.00 : 2: bf cr7*4+1,3f
> 0.12 : c00000000004d7a4: ble- cr7,c00000000004d7b8
> : err1; lwz r0,0(r4)
> 0.00 : c00000000004d7a8: lwz r0,0(r4)
> : addi r4,r4,4
> 0.00 : c00000000004d7ac: addi r4,r4,4
> : err1; stw r0,0(r3)
> 0.00 : c00000000004d7b0: stw r0,0(r3)
> : addi r3,r3,4
> 99.48 : c00000000004d7b4: addi r3,r3,4
>
> ~300% in one function. Urgh.
>
> This is caused by the way we parse objdump -S output, eg:
>
> addi r3,r3,1
> c00000000004d78c: addi r3,r3,1
>
> 1: bf cr7*4+2,2f
> c00000000004d790: bne- cr7,c00000000004d7a4
>
> We assume the asm label (1:) is an address, compute a bogus offset
> into the function and then screw up the matching of samples to lines.
> I notice this also fails with c inline assembly in a similar
> manner.
>
> We already have a sanity check that the address is not beyond the end
> of the function, so add a check against the start too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Acked-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-07 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 3:55 [PATCH] perf annotate: Numeric assembly labels cause incorrect annotation Anton Blanchard
2012-02-07 14:25 ` Eric B Munson [this message]
2012-02-07 14:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-09 10:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-02-09 13:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-09 14:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-02-09 15:50 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120207142521.GA5840@mgebm.net \
--to=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.