From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, kexec-list <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: No need to disable ioapic in crash path
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:19:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207221924.GH6346@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207215741.GD5650@redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:57:41PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:24:46PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Eric, brought up a point that because the boot code was restructured we may
> > > not need to disable the io apic any more in the crash path. The original
> > > concern that led to the development of disable_IO_APIC, was that the TSC
> > > calibration on boot up relied on the PIT timer for reference. Access
> > > to the PIT required 8259 interrupts to be working. This wouldn't work
> > > if the ioapic needed to be configured. So on panic path, the ioapic was
> > > reconfigured to use virtual wire mode to allow the 8259 to passthrough.
> >
> > A small clarification originally it was the jiffies calibration that
> > would fail if we could cause the PIT to generate interrupts through the
> > 8259. The boot would then hang at calibrating jiffies.
>
> Ok. Thanks!
So now what has changed? Do we setup LAPIC and IOAPIC early enough to
receive PIT interrupts in regular mode (non-virtual wire mode) or
something else?
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kexec-list <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump: No need to disable ioapic in crash path
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:19:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207221924.GH6346@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207215741.GD5650@redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:57:41PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:24:46PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Eric, brought up a point that because the boot code was restructured we may
> > > not need to disable the io apic any more in the crash path. The original
> > > concern that led to the development of disable_IO_APIC, was that the TSC
> > > calibration on boot up relied on the PIT timer for reference. Access
> > > to the PIT required 8259 interrupts to be working. This wouldn't work
> > > if the ioapic needed to be configured. So on panic path, the ioapic was
> > > reconfigured to use virtual wire mode to allow the 8259 to passthrough.
> >
> > A small clarification originally it was the jiffies calibration that
> > would fail if we could cause the PIT to generate interrupts through the
> > 8259. The boot would then hang at calibrating jiffies.
>
> Ok. Thanks!
So now what has changed? Do we setup LAPIC and IOAPIC early enough to
receive PIT interrupts in regular mode (non-virtual wire mode) or
something else?
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-07 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 18:12 [PATCH] x86, kdump: No need to disable ioapic in crash path Don Zickus
2012-02-02 18:12 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-02 23:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-02 23:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-07 21:57 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-07 21:57 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-07 22:19 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-02-07 22:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-07 23:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-07 23:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-08 20:11 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-08 20:11 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-08 22:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-08 22:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-09 14:48 ` Don Zickus
2012-02-09 14:48 ` Don Zickus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-29 20:08 Don Zickus
2012-02-29 20:08 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-15 20:26 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-15 20:26 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-15 21:16 ` Seiji Aguchi
2012-03-15 21:16 ` Seiji Aguchi
2012-03-15 21:33 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-15 21:33 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-15 21:37 ` Seiji Aguchi
2012-03-15 21:37 ` Seiji Aguchi
2012-04-30 20:53 ` Don Zickus
2012-04-30 20:53 ` Don Zickus
2012-05-02 19:10 ` Seiji Aguchi
2012-05-02 19:10 ` Seiji Aguchi
2012-05-02 19:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-05-02 19:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-05-02 19:59 ` Don Zickus
2012-05-02 19:59 ` Don Zickus
2012-05-02 20:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-05-02 20:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-29 16:02 ` Don Zickus
2012-03-29 16:02 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120207221924.GH6346@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.