From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5 4/5] hwmon: add MAX197 support
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:15:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120210161538.GB1060@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120210110755.4914b332@v0nbox>
Vivien,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:46:04 -0800,
> Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 15:15 -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > BTW, about the TS-5500 ADC part, is a platform ts5500_adc.c file the
> > > better solution, or should the device be declared in the ts5500.c
> > > platform code?
> > >
> > I would suggest to declare it in the ts5500.c platform code. That
> > seems to be the common approach as far as I can see.
> >
> > platform_add_devices() works pretty well for this. It saves you from
> > having to call platform_device_register() for each device separately.
> > Obviously that only works if all devices are declared in a single
> > file.
>
> As the LED is registered using the leds_class, I think
> platform_add_devices() couldn't be used here.
>
> Lots of platform codes don't check the returned
> value of platform_add_devices(). Should we care about a LED or ADC
> registration failure (is the following snippet OK?)?
>
> static int __init ts5500_init(void)
> {
> [...]
> pdev = platform_device_register_simple("ts5500", -1, NULL, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(pdev);
> goto release_mem;
> }
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ts5500);
>
> ret = sysfs_create_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
> &ts5500_attr_group);
> if (ret)
> goto release_pdev;
>
> led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &ts5500_led_cdev);
> if (ts5500->adc) {
> ts5500_adc_pdev.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> platform_device_register(&ts5500_adc_pdev);
> }
>
I didn't look at other code, but personally I try to be consistent.
Why do you check the return value from platform_device_register_simple() above,
but not the return code from platform_device_register() ?
That does not seem to be very consistent to me.
Thanks,
Guenter
> return 0;
>
> release_pdev:
> platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> release_mem:
> kfree(ts5500);
>
> return ret;
> }
> device_initcall(ts5500_init);
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> Vivien Didelot
> Savoir-faire Linux Inc.
> Tel: (514) 276-5468 #149
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] hwmon: add MAX197 support
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:15:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120210161538.GB1060@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120210110755.4914b332@v0nbox>
Vivien,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:46:04 -0800,
> Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 15:15 -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > BTW, about the TS-5500 ADC part, is a platform ts5500_adc.c file the
> > > better solution, or should the device be declared in the ts5500.c
> > > platform code?
> > >
> > I would suggest to declare it in the ts5500.c platform code. That
> > seems to be the common approach as far as I can see.
> >
> > platform_add_devices() works pretty well for this. It saves you from
> > having to call platform_device_register() for each device separately.
> > Obviously that only works if all devices are declared in a single
> > file.
>
> As the LED is registered using the leds_class, I think
> platform_add_devices() couldn't be used here.
>
> Lots of platform codes don't check the returned
> value of platform_add_devices(). Should we care about a LED or ADC
> registration failure (is the following snippet OK?)?
>
> static int __init ts5500_init(void)
> {
> [...]
> pdev = platform_device_register_simple("ts5500", -1, NULL, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(pdev);
> goto release_mem;
> }
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ts5500);
>
> ret = sysfs_create_group(&pdev->dev.kobj,
> &ts5500_attr_group);
> if (ret)
> goto release_pdev;
>
> led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &ts5500_led_cdev);
> if (ts5500->adc) {
> ts5500_adc_pdev.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> platform_device_register(&ts5500_adc_pdev);
> }
>
I didn't look at other code, but personally I try to be consistent.
Why do you check the return value from platform_device_register_simple() above,
but not the return code from platform_device_register() ?
That does not seem to be very consistent to me.
Thanks,
Guenter
> return 0;
>
> release_pdev:
> platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> release_mem:
> kfree(ts5500);
>
> return ret;
> }
> device_initcall(ts5500_init);
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> Vivien Didelot
> Savoir-faire Linux Inc.
> Tel: (514) 276-5468 #149
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 21:05 [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5 0/5] Support for the TS-5500 platform Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5 1/5] x86/platform: (TS-5500) add platform base support Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5 2/5] x86/platform: (TS-5500) add GPIO support Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:30 ` [lm-sensors] " Alan Cox
2012-02-01 21:30 ` Alan Cox
2012-02-02 19:33 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2012-02-02 19:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-06 15:37 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2012-02-06 15:37 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 20:23 ` [lm-sensors] " Vivien Didelot
2012-02-06 20:23 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-07 11:13 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2012-02-07 11:13 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-06 15:16 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Brown
2012-02-06 15:16 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5 3/5] x86/platform: (TS-5500) add LED support Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5 4/5] hwmon: add MAX197 support Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:35 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2012-02-01 21:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-06 20:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Vivien Didelot
2012-02-06 20:15 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-06 20:46 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2012-02-06 20:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-10 16:07 ` [lm-sensors] " Vivien Didelot
2012-02-10 16:07 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-10 16:15 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2012-02-10 16:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-10 18:14 ` [lm-sensors] " Vivien Didelot
2012-02-10 18:14 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-20 18:27 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2012-02-20 18:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-02-20 19:56 ` [lm-sensors] " Vivien Didelot
2012-02-20 19:56 ` Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/platform: (TS-5500) add ADC support Vivien Didelot
2012-02-01 21:05 ` Vivien Didelot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120210161538.GB1060@ericsson.com \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.