From: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@thegnar.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / QoS: unconditionally build the per-device constraints feature
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:07:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120212020757.GF18742@gs62> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328603646-2714-3-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com>
why are these two patches?
I think you could squash them into one and it would be just fine.
--mark
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:34:06AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
> The per-device PM QoS feature depends on CONFIG_PM which depends
> on PM_SLEEP || PM_RUNTIME. This breaks CPU C-states with kernels
> not having these CONFIGs.
>
> This patch allows the feature in all cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: Mark Gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/Makefile | 3 ++-
> include/linux/pm_qos.h | 39 ---------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/Makefile b/drivers/base/power/Makefile
> index 2e58ebb..312eb65 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += sysfs.o generic_ops.o common.o qos.o
> +obj-y += qos.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += sysfs.o generic_ops.o common.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += main.o wakeup.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME) += runtime.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_TRACE_RTC) += trace.o
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> index 105be69..37b017a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier);
> int pm_qos_request_active(struct pm_qos_request *req);
> s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> s32 __dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev);
> s32 dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev);
> int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> @@ -94,43 +93,5 @@ void dev_pm_qos_constraints_init(struct device *dev);
> void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev);
> int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(struct device *dev,
> struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, s32 value);
> -#else
> -static inline s32 __dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline s32 dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev,
> - struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> - s32 value)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_update_request(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> - s32 new_value)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_remove_request(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(struct device *dev,
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(struct device *dev,
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_global_notifier(
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_remove_global_notifier(
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline void dev_pm_qos_constraints_init(struct device *dev)
> -{
> - dev->power.power_state = PMSG_ON;
> -}
> -static inline void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev)
> -{
> - dev->power.power_state = PMSG_INVALID;
> -}
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(struct device *dev,
> - struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, s32 value)
> - { return 0; }
> -#endif
>
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Mark Gross <markgross@thegnar.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / QoS: unconditionally build the per-device constraints feature
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:07:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120212020757.GF18742@gs62> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328603646-2714-3-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com>
why are these two patches?
I think you could squash them into one and it would be just fine.
--mark
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:34:06AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
> The per-device PM QoS feature depends on CONFIG_PM which depends
> on PM_SLEEP || PM_RUNTIME. This breaks CPU C-states with kernels
> not having these CONFIGs.
>
> This patch allows the feature in all cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: Mark Gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/Makefile | 3 ++-
> include/linux/pm_qos.h | 39 ---------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/Makefile b/drivers/base/power/Makefile
> index 2e58ebb..312eb65 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += sysfs.o generic_ops.o common.o qos.o
> +obj-y += qos.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += sysfs.o generic_ops.o common.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += main.o wakeup.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME) += runtime.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_TRACE_RTC) += trace.o
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> index 105be69..37b017a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier);
> int pm_qos_request_active(struct pm_qos_request *req);
> s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> s32 __dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev);
> s32 dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev);
> int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> @@ -94,43 +93,5 @@ void dev_pm_qos_constraints_init(struct device *dev);
> void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev);
> int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(struct device *dev,
> struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, s32 value);
> -#else
> -static inline s32 __dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline s32 dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev,
> - struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> - s32 value)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_update_request(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> - s32 new_value)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_remove_request(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(struct device *dev,
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(struct device *dev,
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_global_notifier(
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_remove_global_notifier(
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline void dev_pm_qos_constraints_init(struct device *dev)
> -{
> - dev->power.power_state = PMSG_ON;
> -}
> -static inline void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev)
> -{
> - dev->power.power_state = PMSG_INVALID;
> -}
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(struct device *dev,
> - struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, s32 value)
> - { return 0; }
> -#endif
>
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-12 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 8:34 [PATCH 0/2] PM / QoS: unconditionally build the feature Jean Pihet
2012-02-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jean Pihet
2012-02-12 2:06 ` mark gross
2012-02-12 2:06 ` mark gross
2012-02-12 21:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-12 21:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-13 13:50 ` [PATCH] " Jean Pihet
2012-02-13 15:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-13 15:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-13 15:40 ` Jean Pihet
2012-02-13 15:40 ` Jean Pihet
2012-02-17 19:27 ` Pavel Machek
2012-02-17 19:27 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2012-02-17 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-17 20:48 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / QoS: unconditionally build the per-device constraints feature Jean Pihet
2012-02-12 2:07 ` mark gross [this message]
2012-02-12 2:07 ` mark gross
2012-02-12 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-12 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-15 15:33 ` mark gross
2012-02-15 15:33 ` mark gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120212020757.GF18742@gs62 \
--to=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.