From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
olof@lixom.net, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add clock part for EXYNOS5250 SoC
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:47:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201202130547.48530.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120211201430.GB24564@sirena.org.uk>
On Saturday 11 February 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 08:07:08PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > what the risk is in changing exynos4 at the same time. It would
> > be great if we can have all exynos use the common struct clk in 3.4,
> > but I'm also happy if we just get exynos5 to do it that way from the
> > beginning and move exynos4 over in 3.5 after you have had a chance
> > to make sure everything still works.
>
> Are we likely to get the common struct clk in 3.4? It's all been
> extremely quiet on that front except for complaints about the lack of
> progress.
Yes, we discussed it during the subarch maintainers meeting at Linaro
Connect last week and it looks like we're finally going forward on
this now. Maybe Grant or Mike are better at explaining the current
status regarding the clk implementation and bindings.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add clock part for EXYNOS5250 SoC
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:47:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201202130547.48530.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120211201430.GB24564@sirena.org.uk>
On Saturday 11 February 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 08:07:08PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > what the risk is in changing exynos4 at the same time. It would
> > be great if we can have all exynos use the common struct clk in 3.4,
> > but I'm also happy if we just get exynos5 to do it that way from the
> > beginning and move exynos4 over in 3.5 after you have had a chance
> > to make sure everything still works.
>
> Are we likely to get the common struct clk in 3.4? It's all been
> extremely quiet on that front except for complaints about the lack of
> progress.
Yes, we discussed it during the subarch maintainers meeting at Linaro
Connect last week and it looks like we're finally going forward on
this now. Maybe Grant or Mike are better at explaining the current
status regarding the clk implementation and bindings.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-13 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-11 17:34 [PATCH v2 00/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add suppport for EXYNOS5250 SoC Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: EXYNOS: to declare static for mach-exynos/common.c Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] ARM: EXYNOS: use exynos_init_uarts() instead of exynos4_init_uarts() Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add clock part for EXYNOS5250 SoC Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 19:52 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-02-11 19:52 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-02-11 20:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-11 20:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-11 20:14 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-11 20:14 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-13 5:47 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-02-13 5:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-13 11:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-13 11:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-13 20:54 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-13 20:54 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-16 3:42 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 3:42 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-16 5:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-16 5:33 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-02-16 5:33 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-02-16 5:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-16 5:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-16 18:38 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-02-16 18:38 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-02-16 5:40 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:40 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add interrupt definitions for EXYNOS5250 Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:28 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:28 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-17 0:10 ` Olof Johansson
2012-02-17 0:10 ` Olof Johansson
2012-02-21 10:35 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-21 10:35 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-03-06 18:55 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-06 18:55 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-07 13:12 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-03-07 13:12 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-03-07 14:20 ` Kyungmin Park
2012-03-07 14:20 ` Kyungmin Park
2012-03-08 5:53 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-08 5:53 ` Olof Johansson
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add initial setup-i2c0 for EXYNOS5 Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add support uart for EXYNOS4 and EXYNOS5 Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:24 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:24 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add support get_core_count() for EXYNOS5250 Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add support for ARCH_EXYNOS5 and EXYNOS5250 Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:00 ` Kyungmin Park
2012-02-16 5:00 ` Kyungmin Park
2012-02-16 5:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-16 5:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-16 5:19 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:19 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:23 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 5:23 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add support device tree enabled board file for EXYNOS5 Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ARM: dts: add initial dts file for EXYNOS5250, SMDK5250 Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ARM: EXYNOS: temporary add board file for SMDK5250 Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 17:34 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201202130547.48530.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@ti.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.