From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "rusty@rustcorp.com.au" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/ia64: remove references to cpu_*_map.
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:02:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120215130240.7308f373.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3B8EAE.4050809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:23:34 +0530
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> This patch ought to go along with the patchsets that do cleanups in other
> architectures as well.. And it looks like Rusty's patchset[1] is a superset of
> Venki's patchset[2].. So, Rusty, would you kindly take this patch into your
> patchset? (It should come before the 11/12 in your patchset. This should apply
> at that point easily, because I have modified it to suit your 11/12 which also
> touches ia64).
OK, I'm officially all confused. I think I'll drop everything and wait
until it settles down. Please, someone prepare a single patch series.
The cpumask-related patches whcih I'm currently holding are:
smp-introduce-a-generic-on_each_cpu_mask-function.patch
#arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold
arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch
#tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold
tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-fix.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9-fix.patch
slub-only-ipi-cpus-that-have-per-cpu-obj-to-flush.patch
fs-only-send-ipi-to-invalidate-lru-bh-when-needed.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-update.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-v9.patch
#
arch-ia64-remove-references-to-cpu__map.patch
cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch
So I'm thinking the thing to do is to drop just the final two?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "rusty@rustcorp.com.au" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/ia64: remove references to cpu_*_map.
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:02:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120215130240.7308f373.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3B8EAE.4050809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:23:34 +0530
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> This patch ought to go along with the patchsets that do cleanups in other
> architectures as well.. And it looks like Rusty's patchset[1] is a superset of
> Venki's patchset[2].. So, Rusty, would you kindly take this patch into your
> patchset? (It should come before the 11/12 in your patchset. This should apply
> at that point easily, because I have modified it to suit your 11/12 which also
> touches ia64).
OK, I'm officially all confused. I think I'll drop everything and wait
until it settles down. Please, someone prepare a single patch series.
The cpumask-related patches whcih I'm currently holding are:
smp-introduce-a-generic-on_each_cpu_mask-function.patch
#arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold
arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch
#tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold
tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-fix.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9-fix.patch
slub-only-ipi-cpus-that-have-per-cpu-obj-to-flush.patch
fs-only-send-ipi-to-invalidate-lru-bh-when-needed.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-update.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-v9.patch
#
arch-ia64-remove-references-to-cpu__map.patch
cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch
So I'm thinking the thing to do is to drop just the final two?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-15 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-15 10:53 [PATCH v2] arch/ia64: remove references to cpu_*_map Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-15 10:53 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-15 21:02 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-02-15 21:02 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-15 23:10 ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-15 23:22 ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-16 1:58 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-16 1:58 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-16 2:32 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-16 2:32 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-19 22:44 ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-19 22:56 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120215130240.7308f373.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.