From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>,
Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Remove wrong error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:17:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120220171705.GA17069@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
It's only called from amd.c:srat_detect_node(). The introduced
condition for calling the fixup code is true for all AMD multi-node
processors, e.g. Magny-Cours and Interlagos. There we have 2 NUMA
nodes on one socket. And thus there are cores having different
numa-node-id but with equal phys_proc_id. For example on such a system
we now get
[ 0.228109] Booting Node 0, Processors #1
[ 0.232337] smpboot cpu 1: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.252088] #2
[ 0.253746] smpboot cpu 2: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.272086] #3
[ 0.276018] smpboot cpu 3: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.296088] #4
[ 0.297745] smpboot cpu 4: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.316088] #5
[ 0.320021] smpboot cpu 5: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.340113] Ok.
[ 0.342324] Booting Node 1, Processors #6
[ 0.344344] smpboot cpu 6: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.372110] #7
[ 0.373771] smpboot cpu 7: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.396104] #8
[ 0.397764] smpboot cpu 8: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.420109] #9
[ 0.421773] smpboot cpu 9: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.444113] #10
[ 0.445865] smpboot cpu 10: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
[ 0.468111] #11
[ 0.472030] smpboot cpu 11: start_ip = 83000
[ 0.016000] NUMA core number 1 differs from configured core number 0
These NUMA core numbering error messages are plain wrong.
The confusing/misleading error message was introduced with commit
64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda (x86: Add x86_init platform
override to fix up NUMA core numbering) and should be removed.
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
BTW, I wonder why the fixup code isn't called from the Intel path. At
least the mentioned patch suggests that something more generic was
introduced here.
And I am curious why there is this specific condition to decide
whether a call to x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id is required.
Regards,
Andreas
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index d43cad7..2ef7685 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1163,7 +1163,6 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void)
*/
void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
{
- pr_err("NUMA core number %d differs from configured core number %d\n", node, c->phys_proc_id);
}
/*
--
1.7.8.4
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-20 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-20 17:17 Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2012-02-21 10:27 ` [PATCH] x86: Remove wrong error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 11:05 ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-21 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 12:56 ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-22 13:47 ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-23 10:23 ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-24 15:31 ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-27 12:07 ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id() tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-28 15:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-28 16:42 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-03-02 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-02 11:51 ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-02 16:06 ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-04 12:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 17:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 18:53 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120220171705.GA17069@alberich.amd.com \
--to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sp@numascale.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.