From: Matt Porter <matt@ohporter.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc-smsc911x: add required smsc911x regulators
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:11:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120221211151.GA1609@beef> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120221184648.GR18185@atomide.com>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:46:48AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> [120213 10:27]:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:14:10AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [120213 09:31]:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:52:34AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > > > > Can't we just leave out the .id and have it automatically assigned?
> >
> > It'd be nice but...
> >
> > > > Unfortunately, there's no such infrastructure in the driver model.
> >
> > > Hmm OK, -1 seems to be just used for name in platform_device_add().
> >
> > -1 is a valid ID also, it means "there's only one of these things so
> > don't display a number". Which is sad but there we are. I'm at ELC/ABS
> > so I might try and find Greg in person here to see if we can come up
> > with something better, it seems like this is something the core ought to
> > be able to help with in much the same way that the USB stuff can.
>
> Matt, care to refresh your original patch using some other number so
> we can apply it as a regression fix for the -rc series while the
> long term solution is being discussed?
>
> Just use some random number for now with a comment, 42?
Will do, I'll post an update with this approach.
-Matt
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: matt@ohporter.com (Matt Porter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc-smsc911x: add required smsc911x regulators
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:11:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120221211151.GA1609@beef> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120221184648.GR18185@atomide.com>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:46:48AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> [120213 10:27]:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:14:10AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [120213 09:31]:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:52:34AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > > > > Can't we just leave out the .id and have it automatically assigned?
> >
> > It'd be nice but...
> >
> > > > Unfortunately, there's no such infrastructure in the driver model.
> >
> > > Hmm OK, -1 seems to be just used for name in platform_device_add().
> >
> > -1 is a valid ID also, it means "there's only one of these things so
> > don't display a number". Which is sad but there we are. I'm at ELC/ABS
> > so I might try and find Greg in person here to see if we can come up
> > with something better, it seems like this is something the core ought to
> > be able to help with in much the same way that the USB stuff can.
>
> Matt, care to refresh your original patch using some other number so
> we can apply it as a regression fix for the -rc series while the
> long term solution is being discussed?
>
> Just use some random number for now with a comment, 42?
Will do, I'll post an update with this approach.
-Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-21 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 16:43 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc-smsc911x: add required smsc911x regulators Matt Porter
2012-02-13 16:43 ` Matt Porter
2012-02-13 16:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-13 16:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-13 16:56 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-13 16:56 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-13 17:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-13 17:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-13 18:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-13 18:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-13 18:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-13 18:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-13 18:58 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-13 18:58 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-21 18:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-21 18:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-21 21:11 ` Matt Porter [this message]
2012-02-21 21:11 ` Matt Porter
2012-02-13 18:17 ` Matt Porter
2012-02-13 18:17 ` Matt Porter
2012-02-13 18:17 ` Matt Porter
2012-02-14 11:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-14 11:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-22 16:29 ` Matt Porter
2012-02-22 16:29 ` Matt Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120221211151.GA1609@beef \
--to=matt@ohporter.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mporter@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.