From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: santosh prasad nayak <santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: Fix copy_to_user too small size parametre.
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:03:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120301130311.GA7429@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOD=uF6yqCETUG8jMCmjYDM+L1DsM91OiRveONJkNxMf=skTSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:15:05PM +0530, santosh prasad nayak wrote:
> Hi Pablo.
>
> copy_to_user( dest, source, length)
>
> Normally, 'length' is equal to 'sizeof (source) '.
>
> In this case "length" = 32
> "sizeof(source)" = 29.
>
> Is it intentional ?
ebtables expects 32 bytes names.
> Won't it copy extra 3 bytes of kernel data to userspace ?
You're right. We have to copy 29 bytes but we have to fill the
remaining bytes with zeroes. I think something like:
char name[EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN] = {};
/* user-space ebtables expects 32 bytes-long names, but xt_match uses
* 29 bytes for that. */
sprintf(name, "%s", m->u.match->name);
if (copy_to_user(hlp, name, EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN))
...
will resolve this issue.
Would you resend a new patch?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: santosh prasad nayak <santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com>
Cc: bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be, kaber@trash.net,
shemminger@vyatta.com, davem@davemloft.net,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: Fix copy_to_user too small size parametre.
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:03:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120301130311.GA7429@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOD=uF6yqCETUG8jMCmjYDM+L1DsM91OiRveONJkNxMf=skTSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:15:05PM +0530, santosh prasad nayak wrote:
> Hi Pablo.
>
> copy_to_user( dest, source, length)
>
> Normally, 'length' is equal to 'sizeof (source) '.
>
> In this case "length" = 32
> "sizeof(source)" = 29.
>
> Is it intentional ?
ebtables expects 32 bytes names.
> Won't it copy extra 3 bytes of kernel data to userspace ?
You're right. We have to copy 29 bytes but we have to fill the
remaining bytes with zeroes. I think something like:
char name[EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN] = {};
/* user-space ebtables expects 32 bytes-long names, but xt_match uses
* 29 bytes for that. */
sprintf(name, "%s", m->u.match->name);
if (copy_to_user(hlp, name, EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN))
...
will resolve this issue.
Would you resend a new patch?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: santosh prasad nayak <santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com>
Cc: bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be, kaber@trash.net,
shemminger@vyatta.com, davem@davemloft.net,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: Fix copy_to_user too small size parametre.
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:03:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120301130311.GA7429@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOD=uF6yqCETUG8jMCmjYDM+L1DsM91OiRveONJkNxMf=skTSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:15:05PM +0530, santosh prasad nayak wrote:
> Hi Pablo.
>
> copy_to_user( dest, source, length)
>
> Normally, 'length' is equal to 'sizeof (source) '.
>
> In this case "length" = 32
> "sizeof(source)" = 29.
>
> Is it intentional ?
ebtables expects 32 bytes names.
> Won't it copy extra 3 bytes of kernel data to userspace ?
You're right. We have to copy 29 bytes but we have to fill the
remaining bytes with zeroes. I think something like:
char name[EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN] = {};
/* user-space ebtables expects 32 bytes-long names, but xt_match uses
* 29 bytes for that. */
sprintf(name, "%s", m->u.match->name);
if (copy_to_user(hlp, name, EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN))
...
will resolve this issue.
Would you resend a new patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-01 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-01 9:16 [Bridge] [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: Fix copy_to_user too small size parametre santosh nayak
2012-03-01 9:28 ` santosh nayak
2012-03-01 9:16 ` santosh nayak
2012-03-01 10:18 ` [Bridge] " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-03-01 10:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-03-01 10:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-03-01 10:45 ` [Bridge] " santosh prasad nayak
2012-03-01 10:57 ` santosh prasad nayak
2012-03-01 10:45 ` santosh prasad nayak
2012-03-01 13:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-03-01 13:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-03-01 13:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-03-01 13:51 ` [Bridge] " santosh prasad nayak
2012-03-01 13:52 ` santosh prasad nayak
2012-03-01 13:51 ` santosh prasad nayak
2012-03-01 11:37 ` [Bridge] " Dan Carpenter
2012-03-01 11:37 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-03-01 11:37 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-03-01 13:06 ` [Bridge] " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-03-01 13:06 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-03-01 13:06 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-03-01 13:13 ` [Bridge] " Dan Carpenter
2012-03-01 13:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-03-01 13:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-03-01 11:31 ` [Bridge] " Dan Carpenter
2012-03-01 11:31 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-03-01 11:31 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-03-01 15:00 ` walter harms
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120301130311.GA7429@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.