From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Latest OMAP4 build errors
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:44:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120307224459.GJ12083@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMiNSyc9F+Wf5pXPG=hRAfnG6aMHtccLBwvekuB3HpyevQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [120307 13:46]:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >
> > What I got queued up in fixes-non-critical-part2 should fix all those
> > errors and warnings.
> >
> > Arnd & Olof, I've posted one fix that should be applied to arm-soc tree
> > at [1]. I've also posted a request to revert one commit in arm-soc tree
> > at [2].
> >
> > As it seems that you did not apply those to arm-soc, please apply them,
> > or repull the following two branches ASAP:
>
> Done (repulled the branches). Stephen Rothwell has not surfaced on irc
> yet, so hopefully this means it'll make it into today's linux-next.
Thanks!
> > Re-pull fixes-non-critical containing one revert:
> >
> > Revert "ARM: OMAP2+: Fix multiple randconfig errors with SOC_OMAP and SOC_OMAP_NOOP"
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap fixes-non-critical
> >
> > Re-pull cleanup again containing one fix:
> >
> > ARM: OMAP2+: Fix L4_EMU_34XX_BASE error after iomap changes
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap cleanup
> >
> > Note that the second one I just pushed, however the patch is known to
> > work for the build errors after merging arm-soc with Russell's changes.
>
> Looks like you pasted the wrong subject above -- the mail below
> contains the patch that you added though so it looked OK to me (the
> subject above was the previous top-of-branch before you added the last
> one).
Oops, sorry about that. The end result looks right.
> > Arnd & Olof, for future, how you want to handle urgent issues like this?
>
> Personally I missed the requests since they ended up in the chain of
> replies and I didn't notice them, my mistake. A separate email
> requesting pulls or patch application it to arm@kernel.org would
> reduce the risk of that happening (Flagging the subject with [URGENT]
> wouldn't hurt).
OK thanks, will do that next time if there's something urgent.
I'll send a pull request shortly for fixes-non-critical-part2 that
should sort out the remaining issues.
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Latest OMAP4 build errors
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:44:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120307224459.GJ12083@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMiNSyc9F+Wf5pXPG=hRAfnG6aMHtccLBwvekuB3HpyevQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [120307 13:46]:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >
> > What I got queued up in fixes-non-critical-part2 should fix all those
> > errors and warnings.
> >
> > Arnd & Olof, I've posted one fix that should be applied to arm-soc tree
> > at [1]. I've also posted a request to revert one commit in arm-soc tree
> > at [2].
> >
> > As it seems that you did not apply those to arm-soc, please apply them,
> > or repull the following two branches ASAP:
>
> Done (repulled the branches). Stephen Rothwell has not surfaced on irc
> yet, so hopefully this means it'll make it into today's linux-next.
Thanks!
> > Re-pull fixes-non-critical containing one revert:
> >
> > Revert "ARM: OMAP2+: Fix multiple randconfig errors with SOC_OMAP and SOC_OMAP_NOOP"
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap fixes-non-critical
> >
> > Re-pull cleanup again containing one fix:
> >
> > ARM: OMAP2+: Fix L4_EMU_34XX_BASE error after iomap changes
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap cleanup
> >
> > Note that the second one I just pushed, however the patch is known to
> > work for the build errors after merging arm-soc with Russell's changes.
>
> Looks like you pasted the wrong subject above -- the mail below
> contains the patch that you added though so it looked OK to me (the
> subject above was the previous top-of-branch before you added the last
> one).
Oops, sorry about that. The end result looks right.
> > Arnd & Olof, for future, how you want to handle urgent issues like this?
>
> Personally I missed the requests since they ended up in the chain of
> replies and I didn't notice them, my mistake. A separate email
> requesting pulls or patch application it to arm at kernel.org would
> reduce the risk of that happening (Flagging the subject with [URGENT]
> wouldn't hurt).
OK thanks, will do that next time if there's something urgent.
I'll send a pull request shortly for fixes-non-critical-part2 that
should sort out the remaining issues.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-28 9:02 Latest OMAP4 build errors Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-28 9:51 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-02-28 10:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-28 10:11 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-03-06 16:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-06 17:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-06 17:06 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-03-07 10:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-07 17:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-07 17:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-07 22:18 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-07 22:18 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-07 22:44 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-03-07 22:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-07 23:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-07 23:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-08 3:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-08 3:34 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120307224459.GJ12083@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.