From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Hans Schillstrom <hans@schillstrom.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 9 (netfilter)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:52:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120311155241.GA27058@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <giupeu1.ee21a87813f836d9f587ea0b0e19a695@obelix.schillstrom.com>
Hi Hans,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:37:25PM +0100, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> Hello
> >On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:30:42PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 03/09/2012 12:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > There will be no linux-next release on March 12 due to a public holiday.
> >> >
> >> > Changes since 20120308:
> >>
> >>
> >> xt_LOG.c:(.text+0x789b1): undefined reference to `ip6t_ext_hdr'
> >>
> >> Full randconfig file is attached.
> >
> >The patch attached fixes this problem, thanks!
>
>
> This one is needed as well,
>
> To force xt_LOG to be configured as a module if ipv6 is a module,
> otherwise you end up in the same linking problem
Perhaps I'm missing anything but either way (IPv6 as module or
built-in) the symbol is still defined. With my patch applied, xt_LOG
now depends on IP6_NF_IPTABLES, which depends on IPV6.
Moreover we've got other xt_ target and matches that contain both IPv4
and IPv6 support that don't require this.
Let me know.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-11 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-11 12:37 Re[2]: linux-next: Tree for Mar 9 (netfilter) Hans Schillstrom
2012-03-11 15:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
[not found] <giupeu1.0f6dad72b5ddb117e753f5f660263a5d@obelix.schillstrom.com>
[not found] ` <20120311165630.GA27265@1984>
2012-03-11 16:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-09 8:11 linux-next: Tree for Mar 9 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-09 20:30 ` linux-next: Tree for Mar 9 (netfilter) Randy Dunlap
2012-03-10 11:21 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-03-10 16:45 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120311155241.GA27058@1984 \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=hans@schillstrom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.