From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:36:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203112136.47694.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120311183856.GA13869@game.jcrosoft.org>
On Sunday 11 March 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET
> > config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET
> > bool
> >
> > +config AT91_HAS_PATA
> > + bool
> what is the need for this?
>
> As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore
> if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT
>
When I originally wrote the patch, I was hitting build errors when trying
to enable the at91 pata driver on socs that don't have the right declarations
in their headers. If that has been resolved in a better way already, this
patch can be dropped.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us>, Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:36:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203112136.47694.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120311183856.GA13869@game.jcrosoft.org>
On Sunday 11 March 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET
> > config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET
> > bool
> >
> > +config AT91_HAS_PATA
> > + bool
> what is the need for this?
>
> As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore
> if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT
>
When I originally wrote the patch, I was hitting build errors when trying
to enable the at91 pata driver on socs that don't have the right declarations
in their headers. If that has been resolved in a better way already, this
patch can be dropped.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-11 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-10 18:53 [PATCH 0/1] ARM: AT91: drivers: cleanup patches from Arnd Bergmann Alan Ott
2012-03-10 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/1] ata: AT91 ata driver requires specific platforms Alan Ott
2012-03-10 19:56 ` Ben Dooks
2012-03-10 21:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Alan Ott
2012-03-10 21:36 ` Alan Ott
2012-03-10 21:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA Alan Ott
2012-03-10 21:38 ` Alan Ott
2012-03-11 18:38 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-03-11 18:38 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-03-11 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-03-11 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-10 21:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: AT91 ata driver requires AT91_HAS_PATA Alan Ott
2012-03-11 10:10 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-03-13 20:46 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201203112136.47694.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.