[PATCH] ti-eula-unpack: throw error message in case 32bit-glibc is missing

[PATCH] ti-eula-unpack: throw error message in case 32bit-glibc is missing

[Andreas Müller]

TI installation tool requires 32bit glibc [1]

[1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-January/000357.html

Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
---
 recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc |    8 ++++++++
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc b/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc
index 7c6e7b7..310d19f 100644
--- a/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc
+++ b/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc
@@ -19,6 +19,14 @@ python ti_bin_do_unpack() {
 
     import os
 
+    # InstallJammer requires 32bit version of glibc
+    lib32path = '/lib'
+    if os.path.exists('/lib64') and ( os.path.islink('/lib64') or os.path.islink('/lib') ):
+       lib32path = '/lib32'
+    if not os.path.exists('%s/libc.so.6' % lib32path):
+	raise bb.build.FuncFailed, \
+        "\nTI installer requires 32bit glibc libraries for proper operation e.g on Fedora run 'yum install glibc.i686'"
+
     localdata = bb.data.createCopy(d)
     bb.data.update_data(localdata)
 
-- 
1.7.6.5

Re: [PATCH] ti-eula-unpack: throw error message in case 32bit-glibc is missing

[Koen Kooi]

Acked-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>

Op 12 mrt. 2012 om 10:28 heeft Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> het volgende geschreven:

> TI installation tool requires 32bit glibc [1]
> 
> [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-January/000357.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
> ---
> recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc |    8 ++++++++
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc b/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc
> index 7c6e7b7..310d19f 100644
> --- a/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc
> +++ b/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc
> @@ -19,6 +19,14 @@ python ti_bin_do_unpack() {
> 
>     import os
> 
> +    # InstallJammer requires 32bit version of glibc
> +    lib32path = '/lib'
> +    if os.path.exists('/lib64') and ( os.path.islink('/lib64') or os.path.islink('/lib') ):
> +       lib32path = '/lib32'
> +    if not os.path.exists('%s/libc.so.6' % lib32path):
> +    raise bb.build.FuncFailed, \
> +        "\nTI installer requires 32bit glibc libraries for proper operation e.g on Fedora run 'yum install glibc.i686'"
> +
>     localdata = bb.data.createCopy(d)
>     bb.data.update_data(localdata)
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.6.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> meta-ti mailing list
> meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti

Re: [PATCH] ti-eula-unpack: throw error message in case 32bit-glibc is missing

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:28:05AM +0100, Andreas M??ller wrote:
> TI installation tool requires 32bit glibc [1]
> 
> [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-January/000357.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas M??ller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>

Thanks, pushed with a slight update in the exception description.

-- 
Denys

> ---
>  recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc |    8 ++++++++
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc b/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc
> index 7c6e7b7..310d19f 100644
> --- a/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc
> +++ b/recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc
> @@ -19,6 +19,14 @@ python ti_bin_do_unpack() {
>  
>      import os
>  
> +    # InstallJammer requires 32bit version of glibc
> +    lib32path = '/lib'
> +    if os.path.exists('/lib64') and ( os.path.islink('/lib64') or os.path.islink('/lib') ):
> +       lib32path = '/lib32'
> +    if not os.path.exists('%s/libc.so.6' % lib32path):
> +	raise bb.build.FuncFailed, \
> +        "\nTI installer requires 32bit glibc libraries for proper operation e.g on Fedora run 'yum install glibc.i686'"
> +
>      localdata = bb.data.createCopy(d)
>      bb.data.update_data(localdata)
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.6.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> meta-ti mailing list
> meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti

Re: [PATCH] ti-eula-unpack: throw error message in case 32bit-glibc is missing

[Enrico]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Andreas Müller
<schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> TI installation tool requires 32bit glibc [1]
>
> [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-January/000357.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
> ---
>  recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc |    8 ++++++++
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

I think it causes this error on a 32bit kubuntu 11.10:

NOTE: package ti-xdctools-3_23_00_32-r0: task do_unpack: Started
ERROR: Function failed:
TI installer requires 32bit glibc libraries for proper operation
        run 'yum install glibc.i686' on Fedora or 'apt-get install
ia32-libs' on Ubuntu/Debian
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /stuff/setup-scripts-new/.....
Log data follows:
| NOTE: Unpacking /stuff/setup-scripts-new/....
| NOTE: Unpacking /stuff/setup-scripts-new/...
| ERROR: Function failed:
| TI installer requires 32bit glibc libraries for proper operation
|       run 'yum install glibc.i686' on Fedora or 'apt-get install
ia32-libs' on Ubuntu/Debian
NOTE: package ti-xdctools-3_23_00_32-r0: task do_unpack: Failed
ERROR: Task 3587
(/stuff/setup-scripts-new/sources/meta-ti/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-xdctools_3.23.00.32.bb,
do_unpack) failed with exit code '1'

Maybe the problem is that in my system libc is:

/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.13.so

I know 32bit host is not officially supported (if i remember
correctly) but since the problem is only there it would be nice to
keep it working.

Enrico

Re: [PATCH] ti-eula-unpack: throw error message in case 32bit-glibc is missing

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 06:35:59PM +0100, Enrico wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Andreas M?ller
> <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > TI installation tool requires 32bit glibc [1]
> >
> > [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-January/000357.html
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas M?ller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
> > ---
> >  recipes-ti/includes/ti-eula-unpack.inc |    8 ++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> I think it causes this error on a 32bit kubuntu 11.10:
> 
> NOTE: package ti-xdctools-3_23_00_32-r0: task do_unpack: Started
> ERROR: Function failed:
> TI installer requires 32bit glibc libraries for proper operation
>         run 'yum install glibc.i686' on Fedora or 'apt-get install
> ia32-libs' on Ubuntu/Debian
> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /stuff/setup-scripts-new/.....
> Log data follows:
> | NOTE: Unpacking /stuff/setup-scripts-new/....
> | NOTE: Unpacking /stuff/setup-scripts-new/...
> | ERROR: Function failed:
> | TI installer requires 32bit glibc libraries for proper operation
> |       run 'yum install glibc.i686' on Fedora or 'apt-get install
> ia32-libs' on Ubuntu/Debian
> NOTE: package ti-xdctools-3_23_00_32-r0: task do_unpack: Failed
> ERROR: Task 3587
> (/stuff/setup-scripts-new/sources/meta-ti/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-xdctools_3.23.00.32.bb,
> do_unpack) failed with exit code '1'
> 
> Maybe the problem is that in my system libc is:
> 
> /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.13.so

That's multiarch... I was afraid of that when commiting the change - it's no 
longer as easy to check for 32/64 bit libc as to just look at /lib32 or 
/lib64... And looks like more and more distros are moving towards multiarch, 
unfortunately it's not yet well standardized and there are some differences in 
the implementation. Wookey had a nice presentation at the last ELC about 
multiarch in Debian...

http://elinux.org/images/d/d8/Multiarch_and_Why_You_Should_Care-_Running%2C_Installing_and_Crossbuilding_With_Multiple_Architectures.pdf

> I know 32bit host is not officially supported (if i remember
> correctly) but since the problem is only there it would be nice to
> keep it working.

-- 
Denys