All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
To: Jessie Evangelista <jessie.evangelista@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Grandi <pg@lxra2.for.sabi.co.uk>,
	Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux fs XFS <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:15:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120316171509.GD49365@nsrc.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA8mOyC-xCcNxQFz-M1_TfnxcGBmpUdQ57_vYNVF11jhWK3SSA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:36:07AM +0800, Jessie Evangelista wrote:
> I'm still scouring the internet for a best practice recipe for
> implementing xfs/mdraid.
> I am open to writing one and including the inputs everyone is contributing here.
> In my search, I also saw some references of alignment issues for partitions.
> this is what I used to setup the partitions for the md device
> 
> sfdisk /dev/sdb <<EOF
> unit: sectors
> 
> 63,104872257,fd
> 0,0,0
> 0,0,0
> 0,0,0
> EOF
> 
> I've read a recommendation to start the partition on the 1MB mark.
> Does this make sense?

I would just make the raw disks members of the RAID array, e.g.
/dev/sdb, /dev/sdc etc and not partition them.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
To: Jessie Evangelista <jessie.evangelista@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Grandi <pg@lxra2.for.sabi.co.uk>,
	Linux fs XFS <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:15:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120316171509.GD49365@nsrc.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA8mOyC-xCcNxQFz-M1_TfnxcGBmpUdQ57_vYNVF11jhWK3SSA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:36:07AM +0800, Jessie Evangelista wrote:
> I'm still scouring the internet for a best practice recipe for
> implementing xfs/mdraid.
> I am open to writing one and including the inputs everyone is contributing here.
> In my search, I also saw some references of alignment issues for partitions.
> this is what I used to setup the partitions for the md device
> 
> sfdisk /dev/sdb <<EOF
> unit: sectors
> 
> 63,104872257,fd
> 0,0,0
> 0,0,0
> 0,0,0
> EOF
> 
> I've read a recommendation to start the partition on the 1MB mark.
> Does this make sense?

I would just make the raw disks members of the RAID array, e.g.
/dev/sdb, /dev/sdc etc and not partition them.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-16 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-15  0:30 raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-15  5:38 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-15 12:06   ` Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-15 14:07     ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-15 14:07       ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-15 15:25       ` keld
2012-03-15 15:25         ` keld
2012-03-15 16:52         ` Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-15 16:52           ` Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-15 17:15           ` keld
2012-03-15 17:15             ` keld
2012-03-15 17:40             ` keld
2012-03-15 17:40               ` keld
2012-03-15 16:18       ` Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-15 16:18         ` Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-15 23:00         ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-15 23:00           ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-16  3:36           ` Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-16  3:36             ` Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-16 11:06             ` Michael Monnerie
2012-03-16 11:06               ` Michael Monnerie
2012-03-16 12:21               ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-16 12:21                 ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-16 17:15             ` Brian Candler [this message]
2012-03-16 17:15               ` Brian Candler
2012-03-17 15:35             ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-17 15:35               ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-17 21:39               ` raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier (GiB alignment) Zdenek Kaspar
2012-03-17 21:39                 ` Zdenek Kaspar
2012-03-18  0:08                 ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-18  0:08                   ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-26 19:50               ` raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier Martin Steigerwald
2012-03-17  4:21       ` NOW:Peter goading Dave over delaylog - WAS: " Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-17 22:34         ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-18  2:09           ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-18  2:09             ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-18 11:25             ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-18 11:25               ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-18 14:00               ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-18 14:00                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-18 19:17                 ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-18 19:17                   ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-19  9:07                   ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-19  9:07                     ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-20 12:34                     ` Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-20 12:34                       ` Jessie Evangelista
2012-03-18 18:08               ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-18 18:08                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-22 21:26                 ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-22 21:26                   ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-23  5:10                   ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-23  5:10                     ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-23 22:48                   ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-03-24  1:27                     ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-24 16:27                       ` GNU 'tar', Schilling's 'tar', write-cache/barrier Peter Grandi
2012-03-24 17:11                         ` Brian Candler
2012-03-24 18:35                           ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-16 12:25     ` raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-16 18:01       ` Jon Nelson
2012-03-16 18:03         ` Jon Nelson
2012-03-16 19:28           ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-16 19:28             ` Peter Grandi
2012-03-17  0:02             ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-17  0:02               ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-17 22:10 ` Zdenek Kaspar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120316171509.GD49365@nsrc.org \
    --to=b.candler@pobox.com \
    --cc=jessie.evangelista@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pg@lxra2.for.sabi.co.uk \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.