All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, spender@grsecurity.net,
	mingo@kernel.org
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] futex: do not leak robust list to unprivileged process
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:31:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120320133141.GC2918@peqn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120319231253.GA20893@www.outflux.net>

Quoting Kees Cook (keescook@chromium.org):
> It was possible to extract the robust list head address from a setuid
> process if it had used set_robust_list(), allowing an ASLR info leak. This
> changes the permission checks to be the same as those used for similar
> info that comes out of /proc.
> 
> Running a setuid program that uses robust futexes would have had:
>   cred->euid != pcred->euid
>   cred->euid == pcred->uid
> so the old permissions check would allow it. I'm not aware of any setuid
> programs that use robust futexes, so this is just a preventative measure.
> 
> (This patch is based on changes from grsecurity.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

I like the change.  Much cleaner.  I'm not 100% sure though that
there are no legitimate cases of robust futexes use which would now
be forbidden.  (Explicitly cc:ing Ingo)

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>

> ---
>  kernel/futex.c        |   36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
>  kernel/futex_compat.c |   36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 1614be2..439440d 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
>  #include <linux/magic.h>
>  #include <linux/pid.h>
>  #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/futex.h>
>  
> @@ -2443,40 +2444,29 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(get_robust_list, int, pid,
>  {
>  	struct robust_list_head __user *head;
>  	unsigned long ret;
> -	const struct cred *cred = current_cred(), *pcred;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
>  
>  	if (!futex_cmpxchg_enabled)
>  		return -ENOSYS;
>  
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	ret = -ESRCH;
>  	if (!pid)
> -		head = current->robust_list;
> +		p = current;
>  	else {
> -		struct task_struct *p;
> -
> -		ret = -ESRCH;
> -		rcu_read_lock();
>  		p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
>  		if (!p)
>  			goto err_unlock;
> -		ret = -EPERM;
> -		pcred = __task_cred(p);
> -		/* If victim is in different user_ns, then uids are not
> -		   comparable, so we must have CAP_SYS_PTRACE */
> -		if (cred->user->user_ns != pcred->user->user_ns) {
> -			if (!ns_capable(pcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> -				goto err_unlock;
> -			goto ok;
> -		}
> -		/* If victim is in same user_ns, then uids are comparable */
> -		if (cred->euid != pcred->euid &&
> -		    cred->euid != pcred->uid &&
> -		    !ns_capable(pcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> -			goto err_unlock;
> -ok:
> -		head = p->robust_list;
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = -EPERM;
> +	if (!ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
> +		goto err_unlock;
> +
> +	head = p->robust_list;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>  	if (put_user(sizeof(*head), len_ptr))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	return put_user(head, head_ptr);
> diff --git a/kernel/futex_compat.c b/kernel/futex_compat.c
> index 5f9e689..a9642d5 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex_compat.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex_compat.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/compat.h>
>  #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
>  #include <linux/futex.h>
> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  
> @@ -136,40 +137,29 @@ compat_sys_get_robust_list(int pid, compat_uptr_t __user *head_ptr,
>  {
>  	struct compat_robust_list_head __user *head;
>  	unsigned long ret;
> -	const struct cred *cred = current_cred(), *pcred;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
>  
>  	if (!futex_cmpxchg_enabled)
>  		return -ENOSYS;
>  
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	ret = -ESRCH;
>  	if (!pid)
> -		head = current->compat_robust_list;
> +		p = current;
>  	else {
> -		struct task_struct *p;
> -
> -		ret = -ESRCH;
> -		rcu_read_lock();
>  		p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
>  		if (!p)
>  			goto err_unlock;
> -		ret = -EPERM;
> -		pcred = __task_cred(p);
> -		/* If victim is in different user_ns, then uids are not
> -		   comparable, so we must have CAP_SYS_PTRACE */
> -		if (cred->user->user_ns != pcred->user->user_ns) {
> -			if (!ns_capable(pcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> -				goto err_unlock;
> -			goto ok;
> -		}
> -		/* If victim is in same user_ns, then uids are comparable */
> -		if (cred->euid != pcred->euid &&
> -		    cred->euid != pcred->uid &&
> -		    !ns_capable(pcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> -			goto err_unlock;
> -ok:
> -		head = p->compat_robust_list;
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = -EPERM;
> +	if (!ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
> +		goto err_unlock;
> +
> +	head = p->compat_robust_list;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>  	if (put_user(sizeof(*head), len_ptr))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	return put_user(ptr_to_compat(head), head_ptr);
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, spender@grsecurity.net,
	mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: do not leak robust list to unprivileged process
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:31:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120320133141.GC2918@peqn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120319231253.GA20893@www.outflux.net>

Quoting Kees Cook (keescook@chromium.org):
> It was possible to extract the robust list head address from a setuid
> process if it had used set_robust_list(), allowing an ASLR info leak. This
> changes the permission checks to be the same as those used for similar
> info that comes out of /proc.
> 
> Running a setuid program that uses robust futexes would have had:
>   cred->euid != pcred->euid
>   cred->euid == pcred->uid
> so the old permissions check would allow it. I'm not aware of any setuid
> programs that use robust futexes, so this is just a preventative measure.
> 
> (This patch is based on changes from grsecurity.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

I like the change.  Much cleaner.  I'm not 100% sure though that
there are no legitimate cases of robust futexes use which would now
be forbidden.  (Explicitly cc:ing Ingo)

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>

> ---
>  kernel/futex.c        |   36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
>  kernel/futex_compat.c |   36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 1614be2..439440d 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
>  #include <linux/magic.h>
>  #include <linux/pid.h>
>  #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/futex.h>
>  
> @@ -2443,40 +2444,29 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(get_robust_list, int, pid,
>  {
>  	struct robust_list_head __user *head;
>  	unsigned long ret;
> -	const struct cred *cred = current_cred(), *pcred;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
>  
>  	if (!futex_cmpxchg_enabled)
>  		return -ENOSYS;
>  
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	ret = -ESRCH;
>  	if (!pid)
> -		head = current->robust_list;
> +		p = current;
>  	else {
> -		struct task_struct *p;
> -
> -		ret = -ESRCH;
> -		rcu_read_lock();
>  		p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
>  		if (!p)
>  			goto err_unlock;
> -		ret = -EPERM;
> -		pcred = __task_cred(p);
> -		/* If victim is in different user_ns, then uids are not
> -		   comparable, so we must have CAP_SYS_PTRACE */
> -		if (cred->user->user_ns != pcred->user->user_ns) {
> -			if (!ns_capable(pcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> -				goto err_unlock;
> -			goto ok;
> -		}
> -		/* If victim is in same user_ns, then uids are comparable */
> -		if (cred->euid != pcred->euid &&
> -		    cred->euid != pcred->uid &&
> -		    !ns_capable(pcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> -			goto err_unlock;
> -ok:
> -		head = p->robust_list;
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = -EPERM;
> +	if (!ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
> +		goto err_unlock;
> +
> +	head = p->robust_list;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>  	if (put_user(sizeof(*head), len_ptr))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	return put_user(head, head_ptr);
> diff --git a/kernel/futex_compat.c b/kernel/futex_compat.c
> index 5f9e689..a9642d5 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex_compat.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex_compat.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/compat.h>
>  #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
>  #include <linux/futex.h>
> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  
> @@ -136,40 +137,29 @@ compat_sys_get_robust_list(int pid, compat_uptr_t __user *head_ptr,
>  {
>  	struct compat_robust_list_head __user *head;
>  	unsigned long ret;
> -	const struct cred *cred = current_cred(), *pcred;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
>  
>  	if (!futex_cmpxchg_enabled)
>  		return -ENOSYS;
>  
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	ret = -ESRCH;
>  	if (!pid)
> -		head = current->compat_robust_list;
> +		p = current;
>  	else {
> -		struct task_struct *p;
> -
> -		ret = -ESRCH;
> -		rcu_read_lock();
>  		p = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
>  		if (!p)
>  			goto err_unlock;
> -		ret = -EPERM;
> -		pcred = __task_cred(p);
> -		/* If victim is in different user_ns, then uids are not
> -		   comparable, so we must have CAP_SYS_PTRACE */
> -		if (cred->user->user_ns != pcred->user->user_ns) {
> -			if (!ns_capable(pcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> -				goto err_unlock;
> -			goto ok;
> -		}
> -		/* If victim is in same user_ns, then uids are comparable */
> -		if (cred->euid != pcred->euid &&
> -		    cred->euid != pcred->uid &&
> -		    !ns_capable(pcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> -			goto err_unlock;
> -ok:
> -		head = p->compat_robust_list;
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = -EPERM;
> +	if (!ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
> +		goto err_unlock;
> +
> +	head = p->compat_robust_list;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>  	if (put_user(sizeof(*head), len_ptr))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	return put_user(ptr_to_compat(head), head_ptr);
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-20 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-19 23:12 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] futex: do not leak robust list to unprivileged process Kees Cook
2012-03-19 23:12 ` Kees Cook
2012-03-20 13:31 ` Serge Hallyn [this message]
2012-03-20 13:31   ` Serge Hallyn
2012-03-20 17:02   ` [kernel-hardening] " Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-20 17:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-20 17:11     ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2012-03-20 17:11       ` Kees Cook
2012-03-20 17:23       ` [kernel-hardening] " Ingo Molnar
2012-03-20 17:23         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-22 23:46         ` [kernel-hardening] " Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-22 23:46           ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-23 17:58           ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] futex: mark get_robust_list as deprecated Kees Cook
2012-03-23 17:58             ` Kees Cook
2012-03-23 18:27             ` [kernel-hardening] " Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-23 18:27               ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-23 19:08               ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2012-03-23 19:08                 ` Kees Cook
2012-03-23 19:08               ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2] " Kees Cook
2012-03-23 19:08                 ` Kees Cook
     [not found]                 ` <20120323190855.GA27213-0X9Bc/hWBUTk6RaD4rd5nQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-23 22:06                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-23 22:06                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-03-23 22:06                     ` [kernel-hardening] " Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]                     ` <m1fwczvuph.fsf-+imSwln9KH6u2/kzUuoCbdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-23 22:10                       ` Kees Cook
2012-03-23 22:10                         ` Kees Cook
2012-03-23 22:10                         ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2012-03-30  5:05                       ` Matt Helsley
2012-03-30  5:05                         ` Matt Helsley
2012-03-30  5:05                         ` [kernel-hardening] " Matt Helsley
2012-03-30 22:51                         ` Gene Cooperman
2012-03-30 22:51                           ` Gene Cooperman
     [not found]                         ` <20120330050544.GA32299-52DBMbEzqgQ/wnmkkaCWp/UQ3DHhIser@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-30  6:14                           ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-03-30  6:14                             ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-03-30  6:14                             ` [kernel-hardening] " Pavel Emelyanov
2012-03-30 22:51                           ` Gene Cooperman
2012-03-27 18:05                 ` [kernel-hardening] " Josh Boyer
2012-03-27 18:05                   ` Josh Boyer
2012-03-27 19:13                   ` [kernel-hardening] " Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-27 19:13                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-29  9:56                 ` [tip:core/locking] futex: Mark " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2012-08-02 10:35                 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v2] futex: mark " richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-02 10:35                   ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-02 11:11                   ` [kernel-hardening] " Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-02 11:11                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-03 10:17                     ` [kernel-hardening] " richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 10:17                       ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 11:02                       ` [kernel-hardening] " Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-08-03 11:02                         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-08-03 11:19                         ` [kernel-hardening] " richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 11:19                           ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 11:27                           ` [kernel-hardening] " Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-08-03 11:27                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-08-03 11:30                             ` [kernel-hardening] " richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 11:30                               ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 11:35                               ` [kernel-hardening] " Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-08-03 11:35                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-08-03 11:38                                 ` [kernel-hardening] " richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 11:38                                   ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 12:38                         ` [kernel-hardening] " Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-03 12:38                           ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-08-03 12:58                           ` [kernel-hardening] " Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-03 12:58                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-03 13:00                             ` [kernel-hardening] " richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 13:00                               ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-03 17:16                             ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2012-08-03 17:16                               ` Kees Cook
2012-08-03 18:06                               ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] Revert "futex: Mark get_robust_list as deprecated" Richard Weinberger
2012-03-28 18:33           ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] futex: do not leak robust list to unprivileged process Kees Cook
2012-03-28 18:33             ` Kees Cook
2012-03-28 21:24             ` [kernel-hardening] " Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-28 21:24               ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-29  9:55 ` [tip:core/locking] futex: Do " tip-bot for Kees Cook
2012-06-19  1:41   ` Wanlong Gao
2012-06-19  2:24     ` Serge Hallyn
2012-06-19  2:32       ` Wanlong Gao
2012-06-19  3:13         ` Serge Hallyn
2012-06-19  3:21           ` Wanlong Gao
2012-06-19 12:23             ` Serge Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120320133141.GC2918@peqn \
    --to=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=spender@grsecurity.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.