From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com" <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: change behavior of moving charges at task move
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:29:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120322142941.01e601c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F69A4C4.4080602@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:52:04 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> As discussed before, I post this to fix the spec and implementation of task moving.
> Then, do you think what target kernel version should be ? 3.4/3.5 ?
> but yes, it may be late for 3.4....
Well, the key information here is "what effect does the bug have upon
users".
> In documentation, it's said that 'shared anon are not moved'.
> But in implementation, the check was wrong.
>
> if (!move_anon() || page_mapcount(page) > 2)
>
> Ah, memcg has been moving shared anon pages for a long time.
>
> Then, here is a discussion about handling of shared anon pages.
>
> - It's complex
> - Now, shared file caches are moved in force.
> - It adds unclear check as page_mapcount(). To do correct check,
> we should check swap users, etc.
> - No one notice this implementation behavior. So, no one get benefit
> from the design.
> - In general, once task is moved to a cgroup for running, it will not
> be moved....
> - Finally, we have control knob as memory.move_charge_at_immigrate.
>
> Here is a patch to allow moving shared pages, completely. This makes
> memcg simpler and fix current broken code.
>
> Note:
> IIUC, libcgroup's cgroup daemon moves tasks after exec().
> So, it's not affected.
> libcgroup's command "cgexec" does move itsef to a memcg and call exec()
> without fork(). it's not affected.
>
> Changelog:
> - fixed PageAnon() check.
> - remove call of lookup_swap_cache()
> - fixed Documentation.
But you forgot to tell us :(
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com" <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: change behavior of moving charges at task move
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:29:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120322142941.01e601c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F69A4C4.4080602@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:52:04 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> As discussed before, I post this to fix the spec and implementation of task moving.
> Then, do you think what target kernel version should be ? 3.4/3.5 ?
> but yes, it may be late for 3.4....
Well, the key information here is "what effect does the bug have upon
users".
> In documentation, it's said that 'shared anon are not moved'.
> But in implementation, the check was wrong.
>
> if (!move_anon() || page_mapcount(page) > 2)
>
> Ah, memcg has been moving shared anon pages for a long time.
>
> Then, here is a discussion about handling of shared anon pages.
>
> - It's complex
> - Now, shared file caches are moved in force.
> - It adds unclear check as page_mapcount(). To do correct check,
> we should check swap users, etc.
> - No one notice this implementation behavior. So, no one get benefit
> from the design.
> - In general, once task is moved to a cgroup for running, it will not
> be moved....
> - Finally, we have control knob as memory.move_charge_at_immigrate.
>
> Here is a patch to allow moving shared pages, completely. This makes
> memcg simpler and fix current broken code.
>
> Note:
> IIUC, libcgroup's cgroup daemon moves tasks after exec().
> So, it's not affected.
> libcgroup's command "cgexec" does move itsef to a memcg and call exec()
> without fork(). it's not affected.
>
> Changelog:
> - fixed PageAnon() check.
> - remove call of lookup_swap_cache()
> - fixed Documentation.
But you forgot to tell us :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-22 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-21 9:52 [PATCH] memcg: change behavior of moving charges at task move KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-21 9:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-22 15:17 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-03-22 15:17 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-03-22 21:29 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-03-22 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-23 0:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-23 0:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <4F69A4C4.4080602-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-22 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-22 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-22 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-23 0:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-23 0:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-23 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-23 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20120322173000.f078a43f.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-23 0:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-23 0:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-23 0:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-23 8:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-03-23 8:53 ` Johannes Weiner
[not found] ` <20120323085301.GA1739-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-23 9:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-23 9:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-23 9:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <4F6C3BB2.6090108-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-23 9:45 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-23 9:45 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-23 9:45 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120322142941.01e601c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.